Class Notes (835,723)
Canada (509,349)
Sociology (2,430)
SOCA02H3 (398)
Lecture 5

Sociology Part 2 Lecture 5.docx

6 Pages
92 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Sociology
Course
SOCA02H3
Professor
Sheldon Ungar
Semester
Winter

Description
Sociology Part 2 Lecture 5  Term exam: Friday Feb 15 , 3-5pm – Up to end of week 6. 103 multiple choice  Room number: AA112  Deviance + Crime  Poker prodigy, degenerate gambler, drug abuser – Ungar’s life was jam-packed with high risk action from start to finish.  For most poker players and fans Ungar is the best no-limit Hold’em player of all time, having won the World Championship a record three times. Son of a successful bookmaker, gambling was a part of Stu’s life from a young age. At 10 he started playing Gin Rummy, winning $10,000 in a competition at just 15. A flawed genius, Ungar had an unparalleled ability to put people on hands and calculate with absolute precision his chances of winning. Died from coccain overdose. – lost all his partner since he beat them all  Deviance is a core concept in sociology . Crime and deviance is not the same thing  1. Rule making- have to have rules that are deviant  2. Rule Breaking- causes of deviance/crime. Why people conform?   3. Rule application: “social reaction” –cheated on exam. Didn’t get caught.. are you deviant? No one caught you thus you can live with it  People take drugs but not in front of the police but rather In your basement.  Rules (need be made). If there is a social reaction – that means you’re deviant.  rule breaking  Unnoticed/not responded to  “normal”. Rule breaking  social reaction  deviant label  A lot of rule breaking is not responded. – social reaction  There’s a fair amount of rule breaking. Deviance as contingent. Much of it doesn’t get noticed. Rules  rule breaking  noticed. –even if its noticed it may not be responded to  responded to.  labeled deviant – only few people are labeled deviant. Murder’s are the worst ones.  Deviance is a lot of the definition are essentialist. You may bang your head against the wall but people don’t know about it.  Rule breaking + social reaction. What other model can you make combing these variables?  We have no rule breaking but a social reaction. I.e. falsely accused – Innocent (example). The ally police – overturned 700 conviction they thought police have done wrong things that lead to conviction without doing a proper investigation. “he may be part of the gang” – not having real evidence but making false evidence .  Deviance as harmful: Destructive outcomes. May not be destructive. Picking your nose is not harmful anyway. D. O : problems : some deviance is not harmful.  victimless crimes? E.g. marijuana, prostitution- that’s been argued against, the prostitutes are the victim in terms of human trafficking ., soft drugs, gambling. Is But gambling became legal! Cheating on exams specially cheating on med school, people wouldn’t be happy.  Definition of harm varies across time and place – E.g. gambling. It changes over time.  Biggest part of deviance is rule making – you can’t just take the rules that are given. Acts that are inheritly deviant? Is murder always deviant? – it is in the society. Pakistan and Afganistan – getting killed so many people , without any reason. Rape is an example of inheritely deviant. It was mainly a part of war crime but now became common. It’s hard to prosecute. Conflict theory works better than functionalist theory.  Who makes the rule? – the powerful, elites and dominant class (Marxian). Economic problems – they are no being sued. Bonds that are based on junk, it was worthless. They are not being prosecuted. . These are criminal acts but does not get punished. The powerful people do influence the laws in a way. Rich powerful lawyers. Poor people don’t get the same resources as the rich.  Types of Deviance and Crime: look at the chart in the book.   Dying your hair purple. . In Berlin, they create a huge hole in the ear. Consensus crime – everyone agrees. E..g Child pornography. . Conflict crimes: drug use [soft drugs], we disagree. Crimes can move from one to the other. Drunk driving used to be social deviation – happened all the time. The real alcoholics can walk the line. Then it became a conflict crime and now it became consensus crime since there isn’t much to do about. Abortion? – at one point it was consensus crime. Then it became a conflict crime. In Canada now, its gone, its not a crime a lot. But in U.S its still a crime. Another example of consensus crime : homosexual- was a crime, then moved toward a conflict crime and now it more or less disappeared as homosexual fought for the rights.  Note: shifting boundaries between the two shifts depend on the relative power of contenders,. Crimes can also be de-criminalized. Walking in a straight line – then the breathelyzers came in. This goes on over time  Durkheim : not loved in sociology in general since he’s conservative. According to him deviance is inevitable- even in a society of angels. His arguments works fairly well. How do you know you’re good? Finding out the goodness and badness? – there can’t be a good if there can’t be a bad. The whole idea of the gossip is to identify the things that people aren’t suppose to do. His notion is, you have the angels, they make the rules more and more tough that eventually some angels end up breaking the rule. Thus, society need deviance at time.  Drukheim: functions of Crime: it increasing social solidarity.  (1) increases social solidarity through collective expressions of outrage. [reminding people of their common values]  (2) clarifies the group’s boundaries- people would have done certain things and people wouldn’t have- two distinct groups.  (3) may challenge the rules – rules change, allowing them to be changed. E.g. homosexuality. Conflict theory  rule breaking Is inevitable  BUT: is the deviant really different?  Deviant vs. “us” They are not really separated. Or ‘he got caught I didn’t” Or : when bad guys Wear badges.  White collar crimes  Claim: We all violate norms…But get noticed?  Serious enough for  Criminal record?  Jail time?  If you’re thrown out of the law school cheating, you won’t get in to any other law school. Stealing at walmart the first time you don’t get a jail time.  Social reaction: Is a variable process, discretionary, related to power. There are rules that we don’t tend to break. Reaction doesn’t always
More Less

Related notes for SOCA02H3

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit