Class Notes (838,272)
Canada (510,817)
Sociology (2,430)
SOCB47H3 (73)
P.Landolt (1)

SOCB47H3Y - Lecture 1

4 Pages
Unlock Document


SOCB47H3Y - Lecture 1 - 05-08-2012 Read Chapter 1 unpacking the centre Read Chapter 2 thinking about power **Assignment 1 (in class)** Chapter 1 Unpacking the centre it lays out the framework for how to read the book, what is their projects? We've seem absent minded and goofy but we must pay attention to the intro chapters, road map on what happens next. This is the way the book is organized, compass, key points, bold certain things. We should engage with a textbook because it provides a road map for the rest of the semester. Everyday practice as an important entry point for the organization of pattern. If you think about what you've done so far up to 1:30, you thought about coffee, cereal, you texted your friend, makeup, this textbook will tell us that all those things we do, how we present ourselves in public are embodied by power of presence in our everyday lives. It's effective because for the bulk of the time we're fairly happy doing our business and we rarely think that our lives are organized by power. Our personal life is organized by structure and power relationships and trying to figure out how that organizes us. We're talking about practices of common place that we take for granted. Everyday practices and the social organization of power 1)Everyday practices are a part of peoples commonplace and taken for granted activities 2)Everyday practices reflect, reproduce and at time challenge power relations Connection with everyday and social connection of power. Marx and Foucault have different instances of power. It's important to really understand these two competing approaches and theories of power. Depending on how you understand the power, your answer to what is the connection of me drinking my coffee to the social organization of power will differ depending on what perspective you take. How class, gender, age are everyday practices taken for granted. We inhabit these locations, how does social location, gender, class, age as a social location, how is that reflected in and taken for granted? Why are certain patterns facilitated? Why are all commercials on tv geared toward you buying more and eating more like fast food? Why are certain practices discouraged? And discouraged takes the meaning of how something is discouraged differs from a Marxist versus the Foucauldian perspective. Why is making meals at home for family discouraged? Marx would say we work 14 hours, we're tired, no! We don't want the meal, the kids don't want it; this is quite materialized. Foucault would say discursively discouraged, fast food stuff is a symbolic discouragement versus materialistic discouragement. It all depends on your theoretical point of view. Marx focuses on the materialistic side and Foucault focuses on what is normalized as a good. Who benefits from this way of organized everyday practices? If we assume power is embedded in everyday practices like social inequality, who benefits from this? Unpacking the centre: how to approach the study of power? 1)Study the center not the deviant or marginal so most textbooks of social inequality analyze the deviant not the centre which means that when people talk about social inequality in exclusion; the non white people; if we want to understand power, we should study the "controlling" power not the deviant. Most deviant don't start with the center so for instance they study the poor not the wealthy, gays and lesbians as opposed to heterosexuality. When you focus on the deviants, you're studying social inequality from the social order. You're not questioning the structure of power, you're studying the excluded, why those don't have power. If we take the case of race you have the option of studying racism. When you focused on racialized groups, you don't question whiteness, it's a norm, no one asks when we look at parliament or the campus, majority are white. Studying the center. What is it that grants privilege to whiteness? When you focus on homosexuality and ignore what it means heterosexuality, you make the homosexuality the problem to be explored. The textbook starts like this. 2)focus on patterns of social inequality not just stratification Look at the overall structure of power, they look at the way in which the society is organized and stratified structurally. The social relationships, the way we relate to each other, produce and reproduce this thing that is a structure. We focus on social inequality which means we're focusing on social relationships. Stratified theorists looks at the broad structure. Something that is divided by an hierarchy, just the structure, we want something to explain that. For instance, city council or Canadian parliament stratified by ethno- linguistic groups or race. When you look at social inequality you are looking at social relationships as reproducing this power structure. 3)explore the taken for granted features of dominant forms of social organization What is the centre? The centre is a position of social advantage like being wealthy like being straight. We have to go back to our concerns around race, class, gender, age. It's a standpoint which isn't just about straight, white, and wealthy, it's a perspective where you see the world through that social location. It's maintained through unmarked and unnamed practices. When in the book they talk about unpacking the centre they mean a) ID positions of social advantage white, 25-55 years of age, etc. Where do we see these social advantages? How did they come to get these things? b) understand the standpoint of those that occupy the centre c) unmarked and unnamed 4)locate yourself vis-a-vis "the centre" The centre is complex because you can simultaneously occupy positions in the centre and the margins like being heterosexual and middle class. So the centre is not a person occupying the center all the time but parts of you that fit in the centre and parts of you that aren't in the centre. Your social location changes overtime. 10 years from now you might find yourself in a wealthy form. You might be heterosexual but after a horrible marriage
More Less

Related notes for SOCB47H3

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.