Class Notes (835,108)
Canada (508,934)
Sociology (2,430)
SOCB51H3 (51)
Lecture

Deviance & Normality Lec 2 .docx

5 Pages
198 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Sociology
Course
SOCB51H3
Professor
Dwayne Pare
Semester
Winter

Description
D&N: Lec 2 – Definitions and Methods Recent Problems at York  Student refuses to participate with women on religious grounds  Professor response: Defer to school  School’s response: Support religious position  Media response: Supports women’s rights and warns of future discrimination  The point? Allows for debate and redefinition of societal values and institutional responsibilities. Diversity in the discipline  Sociology as a very diverse discipline  Few accepted truths or methods compared to physical sciences or even similar disciplines like anthropology or psychology  It seems likes you can study anything and call it sociology. Example: “Pictures of Pigeons” Jerolmack  Looks at the introduction of pigeons to North America and their place in modern cities  Human interference makes them better adapted to the city.  Sociology? They reflect our own patterns in the city.  Pigeons as a reflection of human social organization What is Deviance?  Deviance as a residual category: What’s left over.  Broad definition: Actions met with disapproval and some sort of social control  No single definition used for this course: Defining deviance will depend on the theories and methods used How do we know deviance when we see it?  Origins in common sense: Even important scientific theories can start with a gut reaction.  Compare to our own frame of reference, Sociologists must take a step back. Perspectives on Defining Deviance  Absolutist: Widespread consensus on right and wrong informed by a “collective consciousness”  Relativist: Different groups have different definitions. Context becomes important in definition  Social power: Tied to Marxist ideas. Laws are created and applied to protect the interests of powerful groups. Studying Deviance  Some issues not present in other types of behaviour.  Tendency to hide their actions  Some flaunt their status due to a specific agenda  Both reflect the “elusive quality of deviance” Deviance is hard to understand because of it’s hidden or obscured nature. Deviant Subjects  Often protective of information  Deviants rarely analyze their own behaviour  May be defensive or reactionary about their behaviour  Often engaged in dangerous activities. Risk for the researcher Statistical Vs. Theorretical Generalizability (Horsburgh)  Statistical: relies on probabilistic sampling  Claims that observed patterns can be applied to those people not studied.  Theoretical: Relies on in depth investigation  Claims that concepts and theories can be applied to scenarios and contexts not studied  Both are scientifically rigorous and useful Interviewing  One on one, panel, paired  Focus on personal interpretations of deviance (their own or others’)  Range from set questionnaires to semi-structured to open ended Advantages  Can allow the deviant to express themselves in their own words.  Allows questions to be formulated as you go.  Can allow the researcher to develop a rapport with the deviant. Disadvantages  Deviants can often be misleading or secretive ex: gamblers  Possibility of leading the respondents. Rules of normal conversation don’t apply  Typically low sample sizes may bring into question the statistical generalizability of the study. Researchers have to focus on the theoretical generalizability of their findings. Example: Patricia Adler  Drug dealers next door  Spent more and more time with the man and his clients / colleagues  Started lending money and writing letters of reference to help with legal problems, even started looking after his kids. Case Studies  Looks in depth into the deviant careers of very small number of participants (usually one).  Often involves tracing the biography or career of the deviant  Looking for insight on how the individual makes sense of their position in society Advantages  Amazing amount of detail  Greater information on the mirco processes involved in larger observed trends  Some forms of deviance are very hard to study  Flexible Disadvantages  Lacks statistical generalizability  Dependence on research subjects makes for a complicated relationship  Difficult to “triangulate” the information: Verification from different viewpoints  Demand on time and resources Participant Observation/Ethnography  Spending time with deviants as they do their deviance  Comes from anthropology: immersion in tribal life  Adopt a role within the group: Tearoom trade: Watchqueen  Exposure to the everyday life of the people that you are studying Advantages  Exposure to unknown dimensions of deviance  View
More Less

Related notes for SOCB51H3

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit