Class Notes (835,244)
Canada (509,045)
Sociology (2,430)
SOCC11H3 (26)
Lecture

SOCC11 W7.docx

5 Pages
82 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Sociology
Course
SOCC11H3
Professor
Joyce Parga
Semester
Summer

Description
SOCC11 L5 Essay - Can be written in first person - Have an empirical evidence – internet sources can be used but there need to be references, at least 5-10 peer reviewed academic books - You don’t have to argue but it has to be position and explain how privatizing is spreading. - Any citation format accepted but must be used consistently Different thoughts and metaphors of policing Community policing - Emerged in the early to mid 1980’s and it was stamped 2 related concerns: o Pressure the police was under from in many cities in US (high crime rates) in the sense that police were community issues or involvement. The police we talk about lose their monopoly over policing. o Idea of community policing – has become what the police are now.  What was community policing about? One of the contradictions about community policing was, for example, Neighborhood policing program – increase in satellite programs or patrol units in certain neighborhoods.  What is the problem/paradox of community policing? There was no sense of community. Another words, neighborhoods that had strong sense of cohesion are likely to be homogenous and lower crime rates and did not have community-policing programs. Community policing was heavy handed way for police to increase targeted racial policing o Community policing is a historical artifact now. Zero tolerance policing - Particularly NYC – police commissioners there are associated with being tough on crime. And it migrated into Canada and UK - ZTP was hard to define “being tough on policing” and Zero Tolerance Policing was about if police were doing their job. Also, the targets of ZTP were relatively minor effects. - Is there such thing as ZTP? Because it means police should never use discretion. o Should police use discretion in carrying out their work? Of course they should. The hallmark of policing is that they use discretion. It is not the only authoritarian state where they use discretion. In fact it is not just their ability to use discretion but also they are expected to. It has to be lawful and reasonable, of course, and has to be consistent with particular principles. We expect police to use discretion. The use of police discretion and how others understand  one of the issue of nature of policing is the nature of police discretion. It characterizes how police understands it. It is the matter of great debate. Sometimes we can argue that the nature of policing is the use of police discretion. Sometimes zero-tolerance is a huge flaw for this reason. So ZTP didn’t last long. Zero tolerance filtered down the justice system. It has been used in cases of drunk driving, domestic violence, etc. But even that has faded away and today it is rare for police to talk about ZTP. However, we hear about zero-tolerance in schools (bullying), workplace, airport security  failed idea of law enforcement migrated into non-enforcement settings. ZRP in schools, drug testing, in specific circumstances. i.e. bullying. Broken windows policing - Influential theory, first popularized by George Kelling and James Wilson - This theory was anchored in 3 assumptions/background themes about the world: o 20-30 years ago, life and society was apparently safer. But this idea of nostalgia that world was a lot safer and simpler years ago. Your radar goes up right away. 30-40 years ago, who was the society safer for? Gay people? Black people? Visible minorities? So who is it safe for? In crime stats, we see the decline in crime rate. Right now Toronto may be the safest place and time. It is intuitively powerful and installed as acceptable idea. o Idea which is widely shared by a lot of people, some extent to liberal individual rights in the 60’s and 70’s. The individual rights have gone too far due to permissive liberals. o Sense that the society was in the moral spiral of decline – severity of respect that people had to be taken seriously. It has parabolic thing to it – it is almost parallel and we are in situation that society and moral is out of control and we had to do something about it. There is urgency sort of quality around discussion of policing. Broken windows policing - Uses physical building metaphor – signals attitude and neglect that encourages more windows to be broken. Elements from psychologists that it is true. - Something counter-intuitive about this: this is where it gets controversial. This physical metaphor applies to people. If we don’t do anything about these people (loiters, etc.) then this will cause serious problems. Then they said that the beggars are the first broken windows. If we don’t do something about a beggar we will have hoards of beggars and broken windows = huge crime rates. These individuals will cause serious crime. There is disorderly type of individual’s metaphor as human broken windows and their presence will multiply. Serious crimes will increase. - What do you do to repair a human broken window? You might think that you follow broken window’s logic. Policing and law enforcement is used in targeted way to bring 16 century vagrancy statues. This is ritorious for 2 reasons: o VAG-SUS  SUS - People that look suspicious  VAG – Vagrancy law: they target Status – who you are, not necessarily what you do. - So what happened when they were removed from Criminal
More Less

Related notes for SOCC11H3

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit