Class Notes (806,694)
Canada (492,412)
Sociology (2,411)
SOCC25H3 (16)

SOCC25 – W 2.docx

16 Pages
Unlock Document

University of Toronto Scarborough
Francisco Villegas

SOCC25 W 2 The purpose of this weeks readings - The value of theory in understanding current phenomena - The pitfalls of uncritical theorizing - The politics of research - The idea of objectivity is a myth. There is no such thing as subjectivity. Objectivity is impossible to divorce myself from myself. No matter how hard I try he will have a bit of myself when proposing. The analysis that I employ is going to include a bit of myself. - This idea of objectivity is just producing knowledge that is neutral according to theorists we are looking at today is simply not true. Understanding Global Migration Theories regarding migration are outdated The amount of research on the movements of people is higher than ever before Current theories cannot explain the variance of experiences, the availability of migration, etc. A key problem is the tendency to see migration as a quite distinct from broader social relationships and change processes (p. 1566). - He talks about how migration is being studied a lot but most is using outdated theories. The way theories are constructed has to do with ability of migration, different people, and complexity of migration. - He says the key problem in theorizing migration is quite distinct from broader social relationships and change processes. - This has to do with understanding and its fear. When people look at Housing, they only look at housing. Without taking a closer look, they dont really study the effective networks and abilities. Migration as a term He starts talking about terminology Some theorists have called for the abolition of the word migration given how typical the movement of peoples appears - Most people have neither the economic resources nor the political rights needed for free movement. The postmodern utopia of a borderless world of mobility has not yet dawned, so that it still seems appropriate to focus on migration as a process based on inequality and discrimination, and controlled and limited by states (p. 1567). - Migration is expensive, the poorest of the poor are not able to migrate - Migration policies favor northern nations and consistently restrict south- north migration - Theories of evolution of migration have to do with typical movement of people. People can go from Point A to B without barriers. This analysis has to do with Northern American. o American people can go to just about anywhere in the world. o But from Middle East you dont experience the benefit of the doubt. You have to prove that you are not going to overstay and wealthy enough. In every year there are additional movement of rules. There needs to be political movement that eliminates states. - Not the poorest of poor migrate. Migration is expensive. o He said the difference between mobility and migration how it can be operationalized. Both take skills n accumulation. What determines skills and what is not? o Migration lower skilled people move. Mobility vs. Migration Mobility and migration are socially constructed terms Both labels take a classist approach to skill accumulation Mobility is understood as the movement across borders of the highly skilled Migration seen as the movement of lower skilled people The construction of both terms heavily influenced by power relations a dominant political discourse sees migration as a problem that needs to be fixed by appropriate policies. The repressive variant is tight border control, the more liberal one is addressing the root causes of migrationso that people do not have to migrate. Either way, migration is seen as harmful and dysfunctional (p. 1567) - Who are highly skilled people? High level of education and those that is very wealthy (even though they are not educated, if they have money that is their skills). - Who is low skilled? Domestic workers, farmers, plumbers, etc. but we have to be critical about these jobs and what they mean. - What does it mean to say how Accountants are more skilled than Waiters? - For someone to receive accreditation, schools must have been a paradigm of Canadian schooling. o Understanding the legitimacy and merit who is a legit doctor or not. The global south, people who are in the South dont have much merit, thats why we have so many doctors driving cab in Toronto. o When we begin to think deeper into this, we begin to see how race plays factor in this. Who is required to take additional courses? Who is required to prove their knowledge and who isnt? - The concept is influenced by power relations o This is a problem that needs to be fixed by appropriate policies. Migration is seen as harmful and dysfunctional. By the distinction above. What does it mean to be understood as the problem? Sedentary bias Idea that the poor are a threat to wealthy nations and must be kept at home Current iterations include ideas of circular migration as an ideal mode of migratory movement. Often referred to as a win-win for migrant sending and receiving nations Temporary worker programs In the Canadian context the discourse revolves around a humanitarian practice of giving employment to the global poor while enabling them to invest in their home countries Exploitation and dehumanization are inherent parts of this program - Bias that happens in migration theory Of course we know these threats, idea of abuse, who is abusing the system, who are understood as violent subjects, who will be dependent on states, etc. - When we look at a set of program it has to meet the Art program. o It is the program that brought extra arms to do labour, and when they are done they are disposed. o There are endless supplies of arms available. o As soon as someone gets injured, they are giving employment to people that have no job in their home country o . They are sending them back so they can use that money in order to make that country better. That is the discourse. - How disposed the cheap labour cost how wealthy these workers work in this context. o In order to do work you have to be certain age, certain kids, etc. because you want people that want to go back. o But there is no health standards, no housing standards, health benefits, etc. To get out of farm you have to ask for permission for employer. If you have problem you get deported and dont get to ask for a different employer. You dont get future contract and if you get injured you also get sent back. That is how arm program actually works. - El Contrato he talks about what is inherent in a lot of immigration research. His understanding of migration as a whole problem. If you are political you will crack down who is coming in. if you are more on the left, u will make sure that they dont have to migrate but still understand them as a problem. Theoretical Bias The understanding of migration as a problem affects the ways research is conducted, the questions that are asked, and the ways findings are analyzed. According to Castles migration theory should not be based on an understanding that migration is bad and thus an endeavor to find ways for people to stay home. If there is a normative goal, it should not be to reduce migration but to find ways in which it could take place under conditions of equality and respect for human rights (1568-1569) - So he has a theoretical bias. He tries to provide solution migration is bad and will make people stay home. o If there is a goal you shouldnt introduce migration but find ways to meet equality and human rights. Theorizing migration should be contextualizing in which diff bodies migrate. o Different forces effect migration on diff scales Macro level (free trade agreement, IMF, etc.) or Micro level. o How does one decide to migrate - what are diversity, complexity, what makes them decide to migrate? o Then he takes this idea whether there should be a single theory of how migration happens. When you look at the literatures you find diff ways to find people of diff borders. Often, theories dont match. Researchers know social fears into disciplinary approaches = a lot of researchers build upon already bad theory rather than trying to engage in different theories and integrate them into more broader theory. A single theory of migration? Migration research is divided across disciplinary boundaries While researchers know that migration cuts across all social spheres, interdisciplinary approaches have been more additive than integrative Disconnect between sub-fields Area studies, forced migration, internal vs. international migration all considered separate fields of study with little crosspollination. Methodological nationalism The link between government funding and migration research can affect the research questions asked, the scope of projects, and the potential recommendations Furthermore, policy-driven research often provides simplistic, short-term remedies to complex, long-te
More Less

Related notes for SOCC25H3

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.