Class Notes (886,332)
CA (530,455)
UTSC (32,322)
Sociology (2,441)
SOCC45H3 (6)
Lecture 2

SOCC45H3 Lecture 2: SOCC45 LECTURE 02

5 Pages

Course Code
Lauren Spring

This preview shows pages 1 and half of page 2. Sign up to view the full 5 pages of the document.

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Lecture 2 • The Elephant and the Blind Philosophers (they each see something other than an elephant) • “Youth as a social category has always been double-sided, encompassing both negative and positive characteristics and stereotypes. If there is one stereotype in which youth, simply by their very existence, are said to threaten the core fabric of society, there is a flipside, in which youth are promised to revolutionize society and cure it of its past ills and failures...Promoting youth, proclaiming their power, strength or virtue, or celebrating their innate creativity or revolutionary potential is not inherently any more progressive, critical, or radical –or just or accurate—than is condemning youth, complaining about youth, disregarding youth or focusing on their shortcomings, problems and deficits. The challenge for critical analysis is not simply to replace negative stereotypes of youth with positive ones (or vice versa). It is, rather, to understand how and why particular kinds of positive and negative stereotypes of youth …are mobilized by different groups in changing social and economic contexts over time.” (Sukarieh & Tannok, 2011, p. 688). • The Ontological Debate: Is ‘Youth’ Real? • Cote (2014) argues that the “youth” question is an ontological one • Ontology: comes from the Greek word for “being” Related to the study of being (i.e. fundamental assumptions about what is real/ not real). • What does Cote mean by this? Ontologically speaking do you believe “youth” is real? • Nominalism & Realism • Nominalism: The ontological position that social reality is the product of human consciousness, particularily the symbols (names) humans ascribe to mental experiences and social events. (From Latin, ‘name’). • Nominalists see “youth” as a social construction (much like “society” or “gender”) • Realism: The ontological position that social reality has its own properties, regardless of human consciousness and social construction. (From Latin, ‘thing’). • Realists see “youth” as a real thing. • What are the benefits/ consequences of each ontological position as it relates to the question of “youth?” • Biological Approach • Youth are often expected to have chronic emotional problems • why is this the case? • Helping professionals who work with youth have a skewed perception that may lead them to believe that the majority of youth are emotionally distraught. • Idea that adolescence is a “necessary” period during which specific developmental changes must occur if the young person is to become a “healthy” adult. • If such changes do not occur, or if the young person appears to be in emotional distress, the individual must be “treated” and/ or “fixed” (rather than looking to the social conditions that might have created these problems) • “nature” vs “nurture” debate. (psychologists, psychiatrists and others who approach the “youth” period biologically come down on the “nature” side of the debate). • G. Stanley Hall, “storm and stress” theory • Hall is also known as “the father of a scientific ‘psychology of adolescence’ • Published Adolescence in 1904 and his ideas continue to hold influence today. • Argued that each person’s life course repeats the evolutionary history of the human species, and that, genetically, every human must go through a period of adolescent turmoil. • Though his theories have been disproved, we continue to hear references to his ideas (i.e. “raging hormones”) throughout Western society today. • Some researchers continue to argue that the “adolescent brain” is different in significant ways from the “adult brain.” This myth is often perpetuated by the media who may view biological studies as being more ‘scientific’. • The psychiatric system today has embraced this biological-evolutionary view, and tends to view adolescence itself as a “disorder”. • Discussion: What are the potential consequences of understanding the “youth” period in this way? • Anthropological View • Margaret Mead published Coming of Age in Samoa (1928) • Proved that “adolescent turmoil” was not universal and that difficulties associated with adolescence in North America were culturally-induced/ caused by the social environment. • Many other researchers have since conducted cross-cultural studies and come out with similar findings: that social factors (and not biology) are responsible for the widespread emotional turmoil found in Western societies. • Sociology • “Sociologically, adolescence is the period in the life of a person when the society in which s/he functions ceases to regard him/her as a child and does not accord to him/her full adult status, roles and functions.” (Hollingshead, 1949). • Sociologists generally agree that adolescence is a product of social expectations associated with the normative structure of a given culture. These expectations are imposed upon individuals by forces outside their control. • But sociologists disagree when it comes to explaining how social structures are came to be • Conservative: Functionalism, Social Evolution Vs. Critical: Political Economy (Macro), Symbolic Meanings (Micro) • Functionalist vs.
More Less
Unlock Document
Subscribers Only

Only pages 1 and half of page 2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
Subscribers Only
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document
Subscribers Only

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.