TY - JOUR
T1 - Corrigendum to “Implicit moral evaluations
T2 - A multinomial modeling approach” [Cognition 158 (2017) 224–241] (S0010027716302530) (10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.013))
AU - Cameron, C. Daryl
AU - Payne, B. Keith
AU - Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter
AU - Scheffer, Julian A.
AU - Inzlicht, Michael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017
PY - 2018/4
Y1 - 2018/4
N2 - The authors noticed an error in the computation of the w effect size in the modeling analyses. Corrected values of w are reported with initial values in parentheses: In Section 2.2.2, w's are 0.01 (0.03), 0.24 (0.48), 0.01 (0.02), and 0.02 (0.04). In Section 3.2.2, w's are 0.15 (0.45), 0.01 (0.02), and 0.02 (0.06). In Section 4.2.2, w's are 0.02 (0.08), 0.02 (0.06), 0.00 (0.01), 0.01 (0.04), 0.02 (0.05), and 0.03 (0.10). In Section 5.2.2, w's are 0.00 (0.00) and 0.03 (0.06). In Section 6.2.2, w's are 0.03 (0.05), 0.00 (0.01), 0.01 (0.01), 0.00 (0.00), 0.05 (0.08), 0.05 (0.08), 0.00 (0.00), 0.03 (0.06). In Table 2, w's are 0.24 (0.48), 0.01 (0.02), and 0.02 (0.04). In Tables 4 and 6, w's are 0.02 (0.06). In Table 8, w is 0.03 (0.06). In Table 10, w's for voter group comparisons are 0.04 (0.06) and 0.03 (0.06) and for prime comparisons are 0.00 (0.00) and 0.00 (0.00). This error does not change any results or interpretations about model fit based upon the G-squared statistic, or about significant differences across conditions in process parameters. Therefore, it does not change any of the hypothesis tests or conclusions. Additionally, the authors noticed minor input typos in Table 5. Corrected values for prime-target descriptive statistics are reported, with initial values in parentheses: Wrong-Idiographic M is 0.14 (0.15), Wrong-Neutral SD is 0.24 (0.23), Idiographic-Wrong SD is 0.16 (0.17), Idiographic-Neutral SD is 0.23 (0.22), Negative-Idiographic M is 0.16 (0.17), Negative-Negative SD is 0.25 (0.26), Negative-Neutral M is 0.46 (0.45), Neutral-Wrong M is 0.22 (0.23), and Neutral-Negative M is 0.60 (0.59). These were table input errors that do not impact the ANOVAs or Hedges’ g effect size computations, and thus do not change any conclusions about the behavioral results. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
AB - The authors noticed an error in the computation of the w effect size in the modeling analyses. Corrected values of w are reported with initial values in parentheses: In Section 2.2.2, w's are 0.01 (0.03), 0.24 (0.48), 0.01 (0.02), and 0.02 (0.04). In Section 3.2.2, w's are 0.15 (0.45), 0.01 (0.02), and 0.02 (0.06). In Section 4.2.2, w's are 0.02 (0.08), 0.02 (0.06), 0.00 (0.01), 0.01 (0.04), 0.02 (0.05), and 0.03 (0.10). In Section 5.2.2, w's are 0.00 (0.00) and 0.03 (0.06). In Section 6.2.2, w's are 0.03 (0.05), 0.00 (0.01), 0.01 (0.01), 0.00 (0.00), 0.05 (0.08), 0.05 (0.08), 0.00 (0.00), 0.03 (0.06). In Table 2, w's are 0.24 (0.48), 0.01 (0.02), and 0.02 (0.04). In Tables 4 and 6, w's are 0.02 (0.06). In Table 8, w is 0.03 (0.06). In Table 10, w's for voter group comparisons are 0.04 (0.06) and 0.03 (0.06) and for prime comparisons are 0.00 (0.00) and 0.00 (0.00). This error does not change any results or interpretations about model fit based upon the G-squared statistic, or about significant differences across conditions in process parameters. Therefore, it does not change any of the hypothesis tests or conclusions. Additionally, the authors noticed minor input typos in Table 5. Corrected values for prime-target descriptive statistics are reported, with initial values in parentheses: Wrong-Idiographic M is 0.14 (0.15), Wrong-Neutral SD is 0.24 (0.23), Idiographic-Wrong SD is 0.16 (0.17), Idiographic-Neutral SD is 0.23 (0.22), Negative-Idiographic M is 0.16 (0.17), Negative-Negative SD is 0.25 (0.26), Negative-Neutral M is 0.46 (0.45), Neutral-Wrong M is 0.22 (0.23), and Neutral-Negative M is 0.60 (0.59). These were table input errors that do not impact the ANOVAs or Hedges’ g effect size computations, and thus do not change any conclusions about the behavioral results. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039899207&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85039899207&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.012
DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.012
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 29307438
AN - SCOPUS:85039899207
VL - 173
SP - 138
JO - Cognition
JF - Cognition
SN - 0010-0277
ER -