ANT203Y1 Lecture Notes - Lecture 16: Homo Erectus, Homo Habilis, Homo Heidelbergensis

36 views6 pages
6 Feb 2013
School
Department
Course
February 5, 2013.
Lecture 16 - Homo erectus and contemporaries
This Class
Finish Australopiths
Early Homo
Behavioural adaptations
o Stone Tool Technologies
Homo erectus
o Morphology
o Africa, Indonesia, China
o Comparison of Asian and African Homo erectus
o Europe
o Technology
Homo habilis
East Africa
2.4-1.6 mya
Earliest hominin tool users
Olduvai Gorge
Cranial Characteristics
o Relative to earlier hominins:
Slightly increased cranial capacity (500-800cc)
Chimpanzee and Australopithecine 350-400cc
40% bigger
Small brow ridge
Smaller face (rel. to Australopithecus)
Reduced molar size
Same bipedal characteristics as Australopithecines/Paranthropines
Tool Kits
Stone tools date to 2.5 mya
Variety of tool industries
Oldowan Tool Industry
o 2.5 mya
o Simple end of the tool spectrum/scale
o Rounded stones that have been flaked a few times to produce some kind of edge
o Made using direct percussion methods
o Made changes to diet possible; eat more animal proteins, previously could only eat the
kinds of foods one could skin using teeth and nails
Could be a reason for reduction in teeth, less need for them
o Variation in shape and size
Unrelated to how they were used, made, or toolmakers thought they should
look
More due to differences in the raw materials/rocks themselves; fracture and
break in different ways
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-2 of the document.
Unlock all 6 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
o Associated (we think) with Homo habilis; morphologically not adept at meat eating and
would therefore need such tools (small tooth size)
Achulean Tool Industry
o 1.6 mya
o Standardized form
Little “fancier”, less crude than Oldowan
E.g. hand axes, most famous example
Distinctive tear-drop shape
Indicates more effort towards planning in tool-making
Ratio of height, to width, to thickness, etc.
Made with specific uses in mind
o Passed from generation to generation
Indicated by those standardized forms
Very little change in Achulean tools across space (Africa, Asia, Europe) AND time
Potential parents teaching offspring
o Associated with remains of Homo erectus, primary users of Achulean tools
o Flaked on both sides
Levallois tool technique
o 300 kya
o Associated with later hominins, in particular Homo heidelbergensis
o Achulean tools were still also being made
o More complex
o 3 steps
Make a flat top by flaking around circumference
Point the flat top by flaking at an angle around circumference
Flake off the pointed top, this is the tool
o Made from large, symmetrical shapes
o Improved spears and knives
Two-step/composite tool
Attaching handles and such
o Raw material from further away
Mousterian Tradition
o Named after particular French Neandertal site, associated with Neandertals
o Lighter, smaller tools
Using Levalloisian techniques
o More variety in types of tools being made for the first time
Fixed to handles/wooden shafts
Variety in types and sub-types
o Meat eating
Upper Paleolithic Tool Industry
o 33 kya
o More varieties of tools, e.g. blades
Flakes
Characteristic for being twice as long as they are wide
A lot more preparation/time required to create
o Stereotypical pattern
o Bone, antler, teeth to make tools
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-2 of the document.
Unlock all 6 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Get OneClass Notes+

Unlimited access to class notes and textbook notes.

YearlyBest Value
75% OFF
$8 USD/m
Monthly
$30 USD/m
You will be charged $96 USD upfront and auto renewed at the end of each cycle. You may cancel anytime under Payment Settings. For more information, see our Terms and Privacy.
Payments are encrypted using 256-bit SSL. Powered by Stripe.