Class Notes (806,513)
Canada (492,267)
Anthropology (1,635)
ANT100Y1 (945)
Tania Li (16)
Lecture 3

Lecture 3 - War - January 20.docx

5 Pages
Unlock Document

University of Toronto St. George
Tania Li

January 20, 2014. Lecture 3 – WAR Montgomery McFate.Anthropology and Counterinsurgency: The Strange Story of their Curious Relationship • What is McFate’s purpose and justification for writing this essay? o Produce cultural knowledge of the “enemy”; counterinsurgents • What is “insurgency”? o Armed rebellion; uprising; of a political and ideological nature o Against current social order o “Cool” as opposed to “hot” o E.g., Vietnam/Viet Cong o Every super power has something to do with some kind of counterinsurgency • Two examples of US military ethnocentrism? o US monitoring Japanese signals during WW2; couldn’t believe Japan would be so irrational as to attack Pearl Harbour o India detonating nuclear bombs underground during testing; “Only we do that, how could they!” • What is “mirror imaging”? o Assuming your opponent will act the way you act and trying to predict their next move based on this o Key factor of the ethnocentrism in the US military • What does “nuts and huts” refer to? o Derogatory term used amongst US military personnel for anthropology or anthropological study o Also “tits and spears” o Used at Westpoint, one of the most prestigious military academies in the USA • What is the National Security Council? o She mentions anthropologists having no sway with the NSC, but they should o Consists of a few dozen people; one of the most “important” systems in US government o The elite of the elite in military and politics o The council that takes over if war or crisis breaks out so that there is no order; no acting president or cohesive government o CFR: council of/on? foreign relations; first step to NSC o Both councils set major policy • What is the Powell-Weinberger doctrine? o To stick to asymmetrical warfare; overwhelming military power to combat opponents; only engage in warfare where the US will be the clear winner o No more “unconventional” wars; after massive failure in Vietnam o Anthropology could have a softening effect on this idea • What is the problem with the US military code? o Revised during the Cold War era and constructed for that kind of expected war  i.e., Powers of “European heritage” going against each other/fighting in similar ways; culturally similar • The US army was not defeated on the battlefield in Vietnam, claimed the US colonel. Why did the North Vietnamese colonel reply to the US colonel, “That may be so, but it is also irrelevant”?And why is this the same for Iraq? • How does the British approach to counterinsurgency differ from the US? o British approach is based on deep cultural knowledge and intelligence; they dealt with it in excess both through colonialism as well as in conflicts with Northern Ireland o As little policing and monitoring as possible; get the population to police themselves through education • Why is anthropology not involved in US military considerations? o Military personnel dismiss anthropology because it doesn’t use quantitative methods; military science is all numbers and quantitative o Found anthropology muddled and confused and couldn’t understand it  Post-modernist, ULTRAself-reflexive, “retreat into the Ivory Tower” quality that anthropology took • What was the role of anthropology in the colonial era? o Malinowski’s paper Practical Knowledge o Aiding super powers in understanding the people they were taking control of  In the long run aiding and abetting; but in the short-run possibly helping mitigate the situation and save lives? • Who was Sylvanus Morley? What did Franz Boas think of him? o INDIANAJONES o Recruited by US naval office to spy for them; was working in Mexico and knew the country in great deal o During WW1 Germany had worldwide operations and extremely sophisticated/well-developed anthropology o Went looking for German submarines in SouthAmerica and didn’t find them but returned with extreme details about every aspect of the places he explored o Boas was completely against any use of anthropology for military purposes  Morley was very anglo, US born and raised? Whereas Boas was a Jewish immigrant to Germany; in touch with the marginalized? Probably had something to do with their opposing viewpoints. • What were the military connections of the following anthropologists? o Carleton Coon  American anthropologist immersed in all four “units” of anthro  Wrote lots of books  Worked mainly in NorthAfrica (Morocco, Nigeria, etc.)  By the time of WW2 he was leading teams of “insurgents”; bombing German military operations? o Tom Harrison  American  Worked in Bornea with guerilla fighters  Insurgent during WW2 fighting Nazis and Fascists o Cora Du Bois  Recruited by Office of War Information to organize resistance in Southeast Asia o Gregory Bateson  Son of William Bateson; prestigious scientific family  Operating in Burma  Rescue missions in enemy territory; producing anti-Jap
More Less

Related notes for ANT100Y1

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.