Class Notes (836,966)
Canada (509,984)
Anthropology (1,673)
ANT204H1 (161)
Saul Cohen (33)
Lecture 10

Lecture 10 - Queer, Trans, Inter - November 13.docx

3 Pages
164 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Anthropology
Course
ANT204H1
Professor
Saul Cohen
Semester
Fall

Description
November 13, 2013. Lecture 10 – Queer, Trans, Inter Bubbles and Sherrod  Love in the gray zone o “moral wasteland” where there is no right and wrong possible because everything is terrible o Like the “chronic and ordinary cruddiness of life”  “Polemics of interpersonal blame” o Poor and homeless people as pawns in political games, crackdowns on crime, etc. o Petey and Scotty, Scotty’s suicide/death being blamed on Petey  The state, and structural inequality, disappear Love Between Men  Endurance AND exclusion o Removing themselves from family because they couldn’t do family the way they should or wanted o Men loving each other in order to endure a difficult life o Also a way to exclude women  Not always “homo” o Behaviour and identity, tops and bottoms  Certain intimate behaviour between men being collapsed into just being gay  Hank penetrating Petey is “not homosexual” because it is a form of disciplining Petey; it is an act of power and masculinity because he is “on top”  Petey in this scenario is the homosexual o A modern, and “unnatural”, category  Homosexuality has always been present, but only recently has it been made into a category (as well as heterosexuality)  o Friendship (Foucault, Ruth Vanita)  Regardless of potential sexual aspects, love between men can merely be intimacy and affection on a level of merely friendship th  Foucault argues that homosexuality was invented in the 19 century when heterosexual marriage became more important; essentially mere friendship between men had to die in order for marriage to succeed  Men and women had to be everything to each other for companionate marriage to be valid; male companionship had to be killed and was therefore was labeled as homosexuality  Vanita argues there is an absurd irony to not allowing men to marry each other since male companionship is pretty much what the institution of companionate marriage is based up
More Less

Related notes for ANT204H1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit