Class Notes (807,235)
Canada (492,664)
Anthropology (1,635)
ANT370H1 (17)

MARCH 5TH.docx

5 Pages
Unlock Document

University of Toronto St. George
Annette Bickford

MARCH 5 TH SYMBOLS, MEANING, AND INTERPRETIVE ANTHRO STRAUSS, GEERTZ, TURNER, OBEYESEKERE British social anthro - British social anthro focused on social organizations, roles and institution and how human social groups are organized, mother in laws, emergence of new kinds of social insitutions such as labour unions, it is about SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS and the organizations of these domains it could be politics-chiefs and leaders or religion-priests and how it achieves diff things - for example, taking a hypothetical society, religious rituals are concerned with roles people play and what groups of people had control over resources and who didn’t. In contrast, in NA it was not role organizations BUT CULTURE. Frans Boas, in order to fight against racial ideas that some races are superior and others inferior. - culture, learned ways talked about difference as SOMETHING LEARNED. Seeing and acting in the world, NOT innatly biological. Culture became imp in NA bc of BOAS to combat racism. Challenge of how to define culture. Easier to document social organization. - British critique: so abstract, that anything can be culture- religious belief, how they move bodies, table manners, what is taboo to eat. Culture is IDEAS AND VALUES that give meaning to these practices and organize society - they said culture doesn’t exist. AMAERICAN ANTHRO - we can document how people organize themselves but that doesn’t tell you why people organize in that why and why they perform certain rituals -organiza doesn’t say what it means to them - ideas and ideologies that reproduce social organization - this debate, now there is more understanding between British/America LEVIS STRAUSS - how society creates conceptual categories (in binary opposition) and how we make up these catgegories to make the World make sense GEERZ - culture is a repetoire of ideas and values and they repotire are shared and help people understand each other but does not help us dictate behaviour. These people could have acted otherwise. They excersied agency but all acted within frame that any decision made sense to actors. Gives meaning to behav and actions TURNER - interested in ritual (rites of passage). These rites are movement when someone is transformed in ritual from one person to someone else ie boy to man, sick to healed. Transformation of personhood through ritual - how rituals work and why people are invested in ritual OBEYESEKERE - problemizes indv psyh and shared system. No one else see this as a problem. He says, we underanylse it, we believe that rituals are meaningful to everyone. We should see relation btwn psyche and shared ritual ALL -culture does exist as a system of symbols and meanings and its all shared, all expressed in wide range of social practices so we can see culturally informed -culture defines humans as unique. Share that it is definitive to human beings BRITISH VS AMERICAN - NA had another school of thought called CULTURAL ECOLOGY (white, steward) emobilizing culture different from turner and geerz. - Interpretative anthro DO NOT see cultural anthro as interpretative but MEANING ***10.05. Culure of white vs GEERZ ON TESTTTT (listen) -symbolic conceptualize humans as a species whose feature is to create, communicate significance, Meaning and whether these are adaptive or not - most anthro infl by interpretative- some culture is adaptive which allows society to exist and reproduce itself, dress, belief, ect many have little adaptive significance. Human compulsion to create meaning and value CLAUDE LEVIS STRAUSS - he spent 5 years in new york, French - many books: tristes tropques, the elementary structures of kinship, structural anthro, the raw and cooked - close with frans boas exposed to Boas that culture is a lens of how to see and act in the world. And these lens are different for each culture reproducing difference members of the same culture can communicate with each other and understand each other Jakobson-structural linguist, that words consist of phenons which are units of sounds with agreed upon rules with meaning of a higher meaning of order. Bat and cat are all sounds that have no inherent meaning. Have meaning because sound diff from each other, English speakers agree that diff btwn b/c have diff in meaning and when combined with at, diff. * All languages do this, arbitrary sound diff are significant, give them meaningful worlds. These languages help us create words and sentences of higher order 2) basic units or structures can be identified 3) contrast between sounds allow the diff in meaning Why this matters? - it is in the nature of human language to take meaning of sound to organize it in a system of contrasting sounds and use contrasting sounds to impose meaning - *out of chaos and disorder we impose categories –we impose meaning and order - higher level of order and impose categories on the world LEVIS STRAUSS -founder of structural anthro -creating meaning/order - if lang can be broken down to meaning, other modes of communication can be broken down into structures and components and analyzed - analysis of rules of marriage where he drew on MAUSS to argue that gift giving is a form of communication. Social practice that is communic like language - all societies, women are considered the greatest gift of all. Bc of ability to reproduce their social groups through giving birth - marriage is a form of gift giving which sustains relationships between families however its diff than reciprocity ** bc it’s the orginal and most basic act of reciporocity - what we call marriage is an act saying, I will give you a women from my group, and when the exchange is formed, we will be linked. Makes the enemy, a relative. - structures are being created (enemy/non, male/female) - this is similar to structure of myth - in marriage people create oppositions (my grp not mine) and mediating this through marriage - myth is the coyote and the raven. The production of children are the mediators in kinship - what we call marriage, originated as first manifestation of culture by whuch he means the first cultural rule/law/ imposition of order in society, when humans differentiated from animals by imposing rule. Rule: must not keep women, give them away so groups can reproduce - point: this is culture, the ability of humans to impose form and order in the world and impose meaning and through creatin of categories and rules (like marrying one outside of social group). Animals do not impose rules (this is a human quality). We create categories and impose rules. Animals have instincts while humans impose rules which create order - only humans create opposed categories and use categories on rules how to live (you can marry one person not another, you can eat pork not cat ect). We have rules which are diff, so they don’t arise from instict because they are arbitrary (some societies you can drive on left some you cant) - creates distinctions on public and private parts of the body, there are some universals some are not. Appror and inappro can
More Less

Related notes for ANT370H1

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.