🏷️ LIMITED TIME OFFER: GET 20% OFF GRADE+ YEARLY SUBSCRIPTION →
Log in
HomeClass Notes1,200,000CA670,000

BIO270H1 Lecture 11: Lecture 11 - Thermal Physiology.pdf

62 views19 pages
whitemuskrat842
15 Dec 2013
School
UTSG
Department
Biology
Course
BIO270H1
Professor
Chris Garside

For unlimited access to Class Notes, a Class+ subscription is required.

Document Summary

Second half will be broken into same number of question per lecture. I don"t know why you don"t like seeing me, but if you don"t post on blackboard. If you live in a temperate region such as we do, daily variation in temperature. Organism sshould have a thermal regulation to deal with effects of thermal energy. Most organism, have chemical, biochemical, physiological responses to ensire that the body temperature is in acceptable linits. Doesn"t mean that it has to be endothermic and has to be controlled. But it does has to be maintianed in a level so life can continue. They do this by transfer of energy between animal and environement. If you are in cold environement: problem is gaingin heat. Ta is not the only influence but the primary one for sure. Animals must be able to survive the extemenes within their ecolgical niche. Have to be able to repsond to change.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related textbook solutions

Molecular Cell Biology
8 Edition,
Lodish
ISBN: 9781464183393
Biology: Science for Life with Physiology
6 Edition,
Belk
ISBN: 9780134555430
Biology
2nd Edition, 2013
Openstax
ISBN: 9781947172517
Concepts of Biology
OER Edition,
Openstax
ISBN: 9781938168116
Essentials of Biology
5 Edition,
Mader
ISBN: 9781259660269

Related Documents

BIO270H1 Lecture 9: Lecture 9 - Osmoregulation completed.pdf
whitemuskrat842
BIO270H1 Lecture 6: Lecture 6 - Reproduction.pdf
whitemuskrat842
BIO270H1 Lecture Notes - Juxtacrine Signalling, Hydrophile, Secretion
periwinklelocust518

Related Questions

LABROTORY FORMAT/SCIENCE EXPERIMENT GUIDELINES:

This is an example from my professor. The actual experiment can be anything related to science, of course. I'm having trouble coming up with an experiment. It doesn't have to be a "textbook" type of experiment, as you will see the example given from my professor. My professor is silly and laid back regarding assignments, but he wants us to understand the process/guidelines for writing up a science experiment. These are the notes that were given in class; I'm hoping someone can help, according to my outline, please and thank you! This is for A&P BIO I.

Title: "Measuring Enzymic Activity at Different Temperatures" (Should catch the attention of the reader, will be the deciding factor in who will read it) Professors Example: “Its fun to Hang out with a Monkey” -Dr. Sweenys Story (Title should be Fancy, and appealing)

Hypothesis: What do you believe? "I Believe Dr. Sweenys Uncle is a Monkey."

Introduction: Prove Hypothesis Right. Why, explain with proof.

Materials: What did you use? Tree, banana, timer, Dr. Sweeny, monkey.

Methods: Describe what you did with the materials.

Result: Proof - Dr. Sweent climbed tree at "x" pace, and so did the monkey.

Discussion/Conclusion: “Dr. Sweeny showed that he had memory of being able to climb trees at nearly the same pace as the monkey, so his uncle was a monkey, similar characteristics. If Dr. Sweeny could not do this, then there is no proof his uncle is a monkey.

Acknowledgement: Thank "so & so" for helping; doctor, peers in class, etc.

Resources: Internet reference, Refer to notebook, Textbook page # and title, or lecture notes.

*MAKE IT LOOK ATTRACTIVE, APPEALING, AND SOUND INTELLIGENT!

**1 Page (Front & Back) Typed! 12 pt. Font (Times New Roman). Double Spaced.

Chapter 7: Microbial Nutrition, Ecology, andGrowth.


Please be sure to include 2 days of posting forthis chapter.

Select one of the following and discuss:

  • Types of nutrients (essential, micro, macro and traceelements)
  • Carbon-based nutrition types: heterotroph, autotroph,phototroph, chemotrophs
  • Chemical analysis of cell contents
  • Methanogens
  • Saprobic microbes
  • Parasitic microbes
  • Diffusion vs. Osmosis
  • Facilitated diffusion
  • Temperatures: psychrophile, mesophile, thermophile
  • Gas requirements: obligate aerobes (give examples)
  • Gas requirements: obligate anaerobes (give examples)
  • Gas requirements: facultative anaerobes (give examples)
  • Microaerophiles vs. aerotolerant anaerobes
  • Capnophiles
  • pH: neutrophiles, acidophiles and alkalinophiles
  • Osmotic pressure: halophiles and osmotolerant
  • Barophiles
  • Relationships: symbiosis
  • Relationships: mutualism
  • Relationships: commensalism
  • Synergism and antagonism
  • Interactions between microbes and humans
  • Biofilms--quorum sensing
  • Basis of population growth: binary fission
  • Generation time-exponential
  • Steps of Growth curve (visual on page 210)
  • Other methods to analyze population growth (direct count,automated counters, turbidity)

Please change the subject line to the topic you picked,we can avoid similar topics this way.

If two chapters are being discussed: the first post is due byMonday at 11:59pm and the second chapter is due by Wednesday at11:59pm. Each original post for the individual chapters MUST beposted on different days. Any replies can be made on the same dayas an original post but you are required to complete four separatedays of posting (not four posts in one day). When two chapters arebeing discussed you should post 2 times for each chapter for atotal of 4 posts. Posts done on topics already discussed will notbe given credit. Please read through the entire discussion boardbefore choosing a topic to post on.

First of all I am not endorsing Intelligent Design (Wikipedialink); I'm asking this because I (someone who does not have abackground in biology, organic chemistry, or philosophy) got into aconversation with someone who does endorse it, and I'm trying tosee his point of view as far as rationality can allow. Second ofall, I apologize for any vagueness; Intelligent Design isn't wellenough defined as a theory for me to help that. I also apologize ifthis is rehashing content already plentiful on the Internet, butfor my purposes I can't simply depend on the likes of Wikipedia orTalk Origins, so what I'm looking for here instead is to take theopposite approach and see, based on your informed minds, if therecould possibly be any reasonable likelihood of an ideal ID theorybeing adopted.

I'm looking for the most favorable consideration for what IDmight be if it were best developed as a viable hypothesis or theoryto get an idea of how far such a discussion is worth taking. Anunbiased, informed Devil's advocate, if you will.

My cursory investigation of what Stephen Meyers (video link) andMichael Behe (video link) say (correct me if I'm wrong) seems to bethat either the first cell was likely designed intelligentlyjudging by the complex code of DNA and that evolution took coursefrom there, or that the first cells were made and many instances ofevolution were from some kind of intelligently guided mutations aswas needed to make "irreducibly complex" cells or body functions(whether the guidance stops after the Cambrian or continued even tothe point of making different types of new bacteria and differenttypes of apes/humans or whether every single mutation and adaptiveability is being guided, I'm not sure if they're at any consensus,and that's why I don't know if I should stop my question atabiogenesis or include evolution). The person I spoke with alsobrought up some specific claims (everything looks designed, DNA hasordered, complex information, blood clotting is irreduciblycomplex, ID can and has make predictions like decades ago that"Junk DNA" wasn't junk) that I don't need you to debunk (I haveGoogle).

But if there could be any possible support or truth to any ofthe above, I would appreciate knowing about that. (Again, Devil'sadvocate so I can be informed and understand where the points comefrom.) Reading an ID book alone, it would be in places hard to knowwhere they differ from actual scientific conclusions. After all,when someone who seems to know what they're talking about and canexplain something in technical detail says that something isimpossible or extremely unlikely, it's hard for me to know why theywould be wrong (are they ignoring other possibilities?misrepresenting facts? are they really right and just getting thecold shoulder from an atheistic scientific community because itimplies a deity?). So I focus on mainstream sources, even if theydon't bother entertaining ID and leave me ignorant of its possiblevirtues. And thus I'm hoping someone from this informed communitymight enlighten me to what those possible virtues might be.