Class Notes (835,894)
Canada (509,478)
Classics (1,714)
CLA204H1 (433)

CLA204H1 - Lecture 06 - The Nature of the Gods.docx

5 Pages
Unlock Document

Vichi Ciocani

1 CLA204H1 – Lecture 06 – The Nature of the Gods Friday, January 18, 2013 Anthropomorphism: Gods are imagined as immortal human beings - Immortality = essentially different from humanity - They eat ambrosia (“immortal food” in Greek) and drink nectar (“immortal drink”) o In order to become immortal (+ maintain immortality): eat + drink immortal food  Ambrosia – “immortality”  Nectar – “without killing/death” - They inhale smoke from sacrifices (for their immortality) - Their immateriality = best described by their blood o Instead of blood they have ichor (“juice, serum”) - They can be wounded and suffer physical pain, but do not grow old or die - They are born as babies and grow to adulthood, but are not vulnerable in their infancy o Gods/goddesses = born as babies and they grow to adulthood after which they never grow old  They are simultaneously vulnerable + invulnerable  As babies, they = protected + display extraordinary feats From invisible and immaterial to abstract concepts - Human embodiments of rather abstract concepts o Gods stand for ideas, abstract concepts - Divine genealogy and relations (of sympathy or enmity) between gods tell us something about how the abstract concepts they represent interact o Gods represent aspects, parts of human life  Ex: Hebe – representation of youth, represented as young lady o Creation of symbols stem from comparisons of different/opposite things  Essentialism – pick up specific element of yourself to describe oneself  Difference between:  Symbolism – more abstract  Essentialism – rigid, concrete o Must see how the gods = interconnected and how their relationships affected them (how they interact with one another) - Greek myth allows for continuous negotiation between those who participate in storytelling and religious activities to better define divinities and their sphere of influence - In this sense, through studying myth we can deduce the underpinnings of Greek society - The gods of Greek myth do not act as models for humanity but rather immortalized aspects of human life o Greek gods don’t represent models to follow  They = depictions of human life aspects  Ex: priests + priestesses had to mirror qualities of gods(-esses) they worship, but don’t need to mirror such qualities their whole life The divine hierarchy - The Pantheon is led by Zeus; the divine hierarchy is formed by gods, demigods, heroes, humans o Presence of formal succession of layers:  Zeus  other gods  demigods  heroes (exceptional mortals)  humans  All interconnected  Provide connection between gods + humanity - Like genealogy and chronology, hierarchy can be misleading - Not about power, but about successive layers which exist between visible reality and invisible concepts The gender of the gods J. Breton Connelly, Portrait of a priestess, 2007:30. “Mirroring the human experience, the Greek pantheon acknowledged the complexities of what it means to be male and female, allowing for sexual ambiguity and plurality, that is, the “maleness” in the female and the “femaleness” in the male.” - Important that gods = gendered - Goddesses with male aspects + gods with female aspects aren’t defective o This is to see how the gods + goddesses interact + see the differences between them 2 - There’s a fluent overlapping of female + male gods - Presence of the interaction of the genders - Genders come from different sources, but myths connect them o Ex: Athena + Hephaestus = both creators, but with different craftsmanship “To be female was to be a wild, untamed virgin huntress (Artemis), marriageable virgin and daughter (Persephone), passionate seductress (Aphrodite), wife (Hera), mother (Demeter), as well as wise, “malelike” warrior and craftsman (Athena).” “To be male was to be craftsman (Hephaestus), warrior (Ares), seafarer (Poseidon), and father and husband (Zeus), as well as to be the “feminine” poet and artist (Apollo) and the sexually active and ambiguous reveler (Dionysus).” Greek myth and emergence of Greek philosophy - Abstract concepts: o Development of the idea of youth – can be seen by observing young people and comparing them to older people o Idea of time o Ex: rain  represents Zeus  male sexual expression  male seed  How does one get from the abstract concept (symbol) to something concrete?  All symbols have repercussions in Western society - Gods look human in their representations - Myth causes philosophy: o Xenophanes of Colophon (6 c. BC)  “Homer and Hesiod have ascribed to the gods all that is shameful and reproachful among mortals: stealing, adultery, and deception.” (frag. 11)  Xenophanes: o Upset with Homer + Hesiod o Acknowledged the existence of one god during Greek polytheism  “In my opinion mortals have created their gods with the dress and voice and appearance of mortals. If cattle and horses and lions had hands and could create with their hands and achieve works like those of human beings, horses would render their conceptions of the gods like horses, and cattle like cattle, and each would depict bodies for them just like their own.” (frag. 15)  “There is one god, greatest among gods and mortals, not at all like them, either in body or in mind.” (frag. 23) - Euhemerus (early 3 rdc. BC) claimed to have found a sacred written text on an island in the Indian Sea. From this he found that the gods of popular worship had originally been great kings and conquerors o Euhemerus:  Described theory o
More Less

Related notes for CLA204H1

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.