Class Notes (903,542)
CA (538,021)
UTSG (45,699)
ECO (1,630)
ECO100Y1 (439)
Jack Carr (32)
Lecture

How to Increase Productivity

5 Pages
121 Views

Department
Economics
Course Code
ECO100Y1
Professor
Jack Carr

This preview shows pages 1-2. Sign up to view the full 5 pages of the document.
March 17th, 2009
-Reduced person hours to build cars by 1/3, 1990-2008 increase of productivity in the big 3 car
manufacturers, Toyota and Chrysler-31.5 hrs to build a car, Honda 31.3, Nissan 33, ford 33.8, average
compensation for the big 3 American car maker is higher, Japanese had profits, American had losses
-new development emerging in Asia that will crush the big 3, Indian Car maker-Tata
Peddling Prosperity-
Krugman-10.2
Krugman disliked Thurow,
-Canadian productivity story
Krugman-1973, magic went away, economic growth is magic-labor productivity is magic as well
1991-avg American family income went up by 5%, got that from working longer hours
Two types of economists-Policy Entrepreneurs-offer politicians simple solutions to complex problems,
analysis are flawed-(thurow, prestowitz), wrong solutions
Professors-work on answers, usually at universities
Policy entrepreneurs said countries must be competitive, is Canada going to be competitive, Krugman
says countries are not competitive, industries within the country is competitive
Policy entrepreneurs-countries with lower productivity will not be competitive, will fall backwards,
Krugman-look at comparative advantage, if countries engage in trade with comparative, both achieve
strong trade
Economic war between US, Japan and Germany-Thurow, US decided to lose the battle
Krugman-problem between communitarian and individualistic capitalism
-suppose US demands Japan to increase imports from US, Japan retaliates, US counters
Solution: raise labor productivity in US, increase R&D funds, improve education, encourage US
households to save
-Depression, runaway inflation, and civil war can make a country poor, but only productivity growth can
make it rich
-only way in the long run to increase standard of living is to increase labor productivity
-in 1967, Fortune magazine surveyed American Industry, how much will real wage increase in the next
îñÇUoÁPZ}µo]víñì9Uu^Zµu[u]l}(Æ}o]}v(}u
Krugman-late 19th century to WWII, labor productivity rose by 1.8% in the US
WWII to 1973-2.8%
1973-1990- less than 1%
Why did productivity growth slow down?
3 different stories that account for slowdown in US
1) Technological factors-no new basic technologies, except computers in the IT sector is coming
forward, but it takes a long time for a major new technology to have a major impact-industrial
revolution-textile innovation, takes years for real wage to increase
2) Sociological explanation-decline in education standards in the US, education standards was
falling, motivation is not the same, between 1960 and 1990, public school students increase by
www.notesolution.com
10% in school, increase in teachers in the same period 70%, the end product, high school system
is still poorly educated,
3) Political explanation-Z]PZÆU]PPP}À[]vÀ}uvUo}]vv]À(}vvµ
due to higher taxes become more risk averse, workers choose leisure time, spend minimum
time at job, more regulation-anti-labor productivity, more hours for the same task
How does Krugman bring the magic back?
US had 2 key problems-low productivity and rising poverty(income distribution problem)
-P}À[Z}µov}Ç}}Z}ou]o(UµZP}À[}µoWu]]PPµo]}vUµ]U
improve education, improved funding for R&D, encourage savings
After EXAM
Canadian Productivity
-2 deficits w/respect to US
-1st deficit-standard of living deficit between Canada to US, GDP per capita (Martin-prosperity gap)
2nd gap-labor productivity gap, Manufaturing, Business sector(private) and total economy (all sectors)
-the two deficits are related
-using 2006 dollars, US GDP per capita is 52,900 CAD, Canada 44,100 CAD,GAP is 8800, gap is widening
through the new century
-the 2020 program of the institute, is closing the GAP to 1981 levels, to $3000 , in order for that to
happen, the average Canadian household would have $7800 more disposable income each year, CDN
P}À[Á}µoZÀòô]oo]}vÆÀvµ]vUv]µv(}u]vP}u}h^µ}
lower productivity growth in Canada, lower standard of living in the future
Institute of Competitiveness and Prosperity-Martin-we are concerned that the stealthily slow drift of
underachievement could erode our economic strength, most Canadians remain unaware of the problem,
doing nothing is not a worthy option
Canadian manufacturing labor productivity vs. US manufacturing labor productivity
1977- 89.8 Canada-100 is US
1982-79.5 Canada-100 is US
1989-78.1
1998-72.2 twidening gap
Manufacturing to new century 2000-2006, index in US went from 100 to 135, in Canada went from 100
to 104, US growth rate of manufacturing productivity was 5.5% per year, Canada was 0.6%
1981-1998-Canadian productivity was 2.2%, US 3.1%, Japan 3.6%, Germany 2.9%
µ]v}~oo]ÀUv}P}À[]À]]
US Can
96-2000 2.6 2.8
2001 2.2 1.0
2002 4.8 1.2
2003 4.5 1
2004 4.0 0
www.notesolution.com

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Description
th, March 17 2009 -Reduced person hours to build cars by 13, 1990-2008 increase of productivity in the big 3 car manufacturers, Toyota and Chrysler-31.5 hrs to build a car, Honda 31.3, Nissan 33, ford 33.8, average compensation for the big 3 American car maker is higher, Japanese had profits, American had losses -new development emerging in Asia that will crush the big 3, Indian Car maker-Tata Peddling Prosperity- Krugman-10.2 Krugman disliked Thurow, -Canadian productivity story Krugman-1973, magic went away, economic growth is magic-labor productivity is magic as well 1991-avg American family income went up by 5%, got that from working longer hours Two types of economists-Policy Entrepreneurs-offer politicians simple solutions to complex problems, analysis are flawed-(thurow, prestowitz), wrong solutions Professors-work on answers, usually at universities Policy entrepreneurs said countries must be competitive, is Canada going to be competitive, Krugman says countries are not competitive, industries within the country is competitive Policy entrepreneurs-countries with lower productivity will not be competitive, will fall backwards, Krugman-look at comparative advantage, if countries engage in trade with comparative, both achieve strong trade Economic war between US, Japan and Germany-Thurow, US decided to lose the battle Krugman-problem between communitarian and individualistic capitalism -suppose US demands Japan to increase imports from US, Japan retaliates, US counters Solution: raise labor productivity in US, increase R&D funds, improve education, encourage US households to save -Depression, runaway inflation, and civil war can make a country poor, but only productivity growth can make it rich -only way in the long run to increase standard of living is to increase labor productivity -in 1967, Fortune magazine surveyed American Industry, how much will real wage increase in the next Z7o2ZZ}o]L Z7ZKZ^ZK[ZK]Zl}}o]}L}KZ Krugman-late 19 century to WWII, labor productivity rose by 1.8% in the US WWII to 1973-2.8% 1973-1990- less than 1% Why did productivity growth slow down? 3 different stories that account for slowdown in US 1) Technological factors-no new basic technologies, except computers in the IT sector is coming forward, but it takes a long time for a major new technology to have a major impact-industrial revolution-textile innovation, takes years for real wage to increase 2) Sociological explanation-decline in education standards in the US, education standards was falling, motivation is not the same, between 1960 and 1990, public school students increase by www.notesolution.com
More Less
Unlock Document


Only pages 1-2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit