Class Notes (903,542)
CA (538,021)
UTSG (45,699)
JEE (553)
ENV222H1 (84)
Lecture

last lecture - catch up part 2

2 Pages
57 Views

Department
School of Environment
Course Code
ENV222H1
Professor
Mairi Mac Donald

This preview shows half of the first page. Sign up to view the full 2 pages of the document.
use of land and use of energy much more difficult to address, here is where efforts have
reached their limits
suggestion: intl law carries certain weaknesses
sovereign state: no country has to participate
participants know others can drop out at any time - thus it gives them veto power to ratify
MEA or else they too drop out
we dont have the ability to impose laws b/c there is no global government
they are implemented by countries using their own domestic policy there are no means to
enforce that at the global level
If international law is a weak instrument then why are we using it?
it is what we know
it is possible to mobilize public opinion to use MEAs for specific issues - smaller vs larger
issues
environmental authorities which have a mandate to deal w/the physical issues of pollution etc.
but do not have a broader mandate to deal w/ larger issues like consumption would lose the issues
altogether
same kind of conflict when looking at resource conservation
laws established in order to promote consumption of the resource
they have conflicting objectives of making country richer vs saving the environment
difficulty between bodies responsible for narrowly defined issues and those responsible for
other departments
other basic problems
the US has not played a leadership role in environmental protection
why not? the movement was born in the US in the 1950s
the US has been overtaken by the EU as the global leader
part of it comes from Republican governments (Bush admin)
also the US feels it is separate from the rest of the world
most fundamental: since 2001 the US has been preoccupied w/ military rule
it is a hegemony: it is more concerned about losing control of their lead
the world leader has an inherent interest against strengthening the global governance as it
diminishes their own ruling power
only by strengthening the global governance can issues be addressed
conclusion: the system is a long way from being perfected but does not offer action
professors suggested action:
we need to strengthen the international governance systems (UN, NGOs) b/c they are the
bodies who have a mandate for environmental protection
If we want to see more effective action we need coordinating systems
We need to increase their budgets - find ways to increase the financial budget
www.notesolution.com

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Description
use of land and use of energy much more difficult to address, here is where efforts have reached their limits suggestion: intl law carries certain weaknesses sovereign state: no country has to participate participants know others can drop out at any time - thus it gives them veto power to ratify MEA or else they too drop out we dont have the ability to impose laws bc there is no global government they are implemented by countries using their own domestic policy there are no means to enforce that at the global level If international law is a weak instrument then why are we using it? it is what we know it is possible to mobilize public opinion to use MEAs for specific issues - smaller vs larger issues environmental authorities which have a mandate to deal wthe physical issues of pollution etc. but do not have a broader mandate to deal w larger issues like consumption would lose the issues altogether same kind of conflict when looking at resource conservation laws established in order to promote consumption of the resource they have conflicting objectives of making country richer vs saving the environment difficulty between bodies responsible for narrowly defined issues an
More Less
Unlock Document


Only half of the first page are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit