Class Notes (922,826)
CA (542,992)
UTSG (45,883)
FOR (108)
FOR303H1 (6)
K A N T (6)
Lecture

Lecture 5: Non-Timber Forest Products & Non-Market Valuation

5 Pages
138 Views

Department
Forestry
Course Code
FOR303H1
Professor
K A N T

This preview shows pages 1-2. Sign up to view the full 5 pages of the document.
Lecture 5: Non-Timber Forest Products & Non-Market Valuation
Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs):
·NTFPs: not timber, but product, benefit, service that comes from a forest/tree & is of use to
humans
oFAO definition: non-timber forest products consist of goods of bio. origin other than
wood, derived from forests, other wooded land & tree outside forests
§ex. berries, Christmas trees, antlers, carbon credits, etc ...
·large # of products generated by forests, but history of forestry direct @ timber usu. cause:
osome NTFPs have been either replaced by synthetics, ex. rubber, gum, or domesticated
into plantations, ex. oil palm, cocoa
oindigenous ppl more dependent on NTFPs then timber for subsistence, had been
marginalized
·sudden interest in NTFPs cause they mean
oincome generation for rural development
oincreased equity in distri. of forest benefits
odecentralization of forest management
oprotection from climate chance
·NTFP categories:
ofood, ex. nuts, honey, mushrooms
ohealth, ex. drugs, herbal remedies
omanufacturing, ex. specialty woods, resins, fragrances
olandscaping, ex. trees, shrubs, wildflowers
odecorative, ex. craft products, carvings, natural dyes
oenvironmental goods & services, ex. bio-fuels, bio. pesticides, carbon credits
·NTFPs for development
osome suggest potential income from NTFPs could be higher & more sustainable than
timber for indigenous ppl
o"conservation by commercialization" hypothesis
§ecological (NTFPs maintain forest-like structure)
§increased organization of markets eliminates middle-men, & improves
livelihoods
·problems with NTFPs
oextraction can damage trees
§ex. bark removal, fruit harvesting
osome species better able to sustain continuous off-take than others
§ex. abundant regenerators
oincreased competition in forest betw. humans vs. humans, & humans vs. animals
olarger markets lead to higher income lead to greater imports of competing products, so
leads to a shift to the highest value of NTFPs which brings risk of unsustainability
osustainability compromised by lack of regulation
www.notesolution.com
§ex. mushrooms in BC, yew in ON/QC
ohealth concerns rise 'bout new health, body care products which are untested
osocial inequity, harvesters often paid low prices dependent on middlemen to transport
crop to cities with the high risk of spoilage
oconflict, often frontier resources (near the border)
obiopiracy:
§bio theft, illegal collection of indigenous plants by corps. who patent them for
their own use
· by major firms of potentially valuable genetic material/species
·can trad. knowledge be patented
oex. of neem tree in India
§prompted widespread development of trad.
knowledge protection (mostly NTFPs) throughout the
tropics
oeffect on forest composition, can shift preference of species in forest to one with high-
value NTFPs, ex. Sugar Maples in QC displacing Beech & Hemlock trees
·conclusion
oNTFPs an essential area of study, can be more valuable then timber
§but not a solution to international development problems, infact can create
unique new problems
·incl. bio-piracy, eco. disruption, & "frontier" style conflict
orequire new legislative & policy solutions
§"bundle-of-sticks"
Valuing Non-Market Forest Outputs: Decisions with No Market Values
·non-market forest outputs: goods & services that can't be sold in the market, aka unpriced units
oex. scenic beauty, watershed values, biodiversity, habitat
·4 types of non-market value:
o1) use value: pleasure you get from utilizing it, ex. days @ campsite
o2) option value: consumers WTP for option to use resource in the future, even if they
don't use it now, ex. Algonquin prov. park
o3) existence value: consumers WTP for assurance that somethings exists, even though
they'll probably never use/consume it, ex. protecting the rain forest
o4) bequest value: consumers WTP for opp. to transfer resources to future generations
·reasons to put prices on somethings that can't be priced:
omarket fails to provide these benefits
§few private incentives to produce output
www.notesolution.com

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Description
Lecture 5: Non-Timber Forest Products & Non-Market Valuation Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs): NTFPs: not timber, but product, benefit, service that comes from a foresttree & is of use to humans o FAO definition: non-timber forest products consist of goods of bio. origin other than wood, derived from forests, other wooded land & tree outside forests ex. berries, Christmas trees, antlers, carbon credits, etc ... large # of products generated by forests, but history of forestry direct @ timber usu. cause: o some NTFPs have been either replaced by synthetics, ex. rubber, gum, or domesticated into plantations, ex. oil palm, cocoa o indigenous ppl more dependent on NTFPs then timber for subsistence, had been marginalized sudden interest in NTFPs cause they mean o income generation for rural development o increased equity in distri. of forest benefits o decentralization of forest management o protection from climate chance NTFP categories: o food, ex. nuts, honey, mushrooms o health, ex. drugs, herbal remedies o manufacturing, ex. specialty woods, resins, fragrances o landscaping, ex. trees, shrubs, wildflowers o decorative, ex. craft products, carvings, natural dyes o environmental goods & services, ex. bio-fuels, bio. pesticides, carbon credits NTFPs for development o some suggest potential income from NTFPs could be higher & more sustainable than timber for indigenous ppl o conservation by commercialization hypothesis ecological (NTFPs maintain forest-like structure) increased organization of markets eliminates middle-men, & improves livelihoods problems with NTFPs o extraction can damage trees ex. bark removal, fruit harvesting o some species better able to sustain continuous off-take than others ex. abundant regenerators o increased competition in forest betw. humans vs. humans, & humans vs. animals o larger markets lead to higher income lead to greater imports of competing products, so leads to a shift to the highest value of NTFPs which brings risk of unsustainability o sustainability compromised by lack of regulation www.notesolution.com
More Less
Unlock Document


Only pages 1-2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit