Class Notes (839,561)
Canada (511,396)
Geography (975)
GGR252H1 (76)
Lecture 7

GGR252 Lecture 7

2 Pages
164 Views

Department
Geography
Course Code
GGR252H1
Professor
Stephen Swales

This preview shows 80% of the first page. Sign up to view the full 2 pages of the document.
Description
February 25, 2014 GGR252 Lecture 7 - Thiessen polygon method o What ought to be now? o What if something changed? Where to potentially locate a new store? ƒ Consider locating a new store at a vertex where there are large polygons first because the market is relatively distant from the store within the polygon ƒ Small polygon trade area means that most people are walking or biking to the store ƒ Is there sufficient demand (relative to all other stores) to justify putting a new store? o Will the new store be viable? o Will the existing stores remain viable? o You still need to consider the impact on the other stores even if the other stores are the competition o Must get municipal approval o Unable to determine what the market is, only what it could potentially be o Not all vertices are viable sites, which is where site selection comes into play o Works well for retail chains that are all essentially the same o Meets the basic assumption that distance is the only variable - Converse breakpoint method o Introduction ƒ This simple gravity model is a modification of Reilly’s law of retail gravitation. o If the places do not vary in size, then it is useless to apply a converse breakpoint method ƒ Reilly’s law of retail gravitation o Two cities attract trade from an intermediate town in the vicinity of the breaking point approximately in direct proportion to the populations of the two cities and I inverse proportion to the squares of the distances from those two cities to the intermediate town. ƒ The converse breakpoint method makes it possible to predict the point between two centres (e.g., shopping centres) where the trading influence of each is equal. We can think of this point as the point or line of indifference (i.e., where the utility of the two centres is equal). It is also the market boundary between the centres. ƒ The method uses distance and size to calculate the line of indifference (i.e., the market boundaries). o Formula ܦ ௫௬ ܦ௬ ൌ ͳ൅ ටܣ ௑▯ ܣ ௒ ƒ D_Y = distance of breakpoint from Y ƒ D_XY = distance between centres X and Y ƒ A_X = attraction (size) of X ƒ A_Y = attraction (size) of Y o Technique ƒ The converse formula requires data on distance between centres and. Size of centres. Together these two variables are thought to adequately measure the relative utility of the centres. The formula suggests that the utility of the centre decreases with distance and increase
More Less
Unlock Document

Only 80% of the first page are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit