Class Notes (865,663)
CA (523,044)
UTSG (45,169)
HIS (3,362)
HIS351Y1 (19)
Lecture

HIS351 September 17 - History, Politics and Imperial Precedents

6 Pages
113 Views

Department
History
Course Code
HIS351Y1
Professor
Professor Bernstein

This preview shows pages 1 and half of page 2. Sign up to view the full 6 pages of the document.
Description
HIS351 – September 17, 2012 1 Historiographical Overview  Carr, history is subjective because people are subjective and they are the ones to write it/record the facts  OPVL  Traditional, revisionist, post-revisionist  Soviet history is more definable by the era that they were writing in o The era had more effect than their individual biases because of the amount of information that they were allowed to have and what they were publicly allowed to publish  Post-revolutionary = relatively open because it was post-1905, there wasn't a lot of censoring o Result was good scholarly works o New information came out about pre-20th century Russia  Stalin period = propagandistic o Tool of the regime :) o Stalin is awesome and runs everything  Khrushchev = more open, new data and contacts o Stalin is awful and ruined everything o Opening of archives (sort of)  Brezhnev = some trends of openness continue, more censorship o Can use the archive but cant criticize things o Stalin is in a dark and lonely corner o Interpret and shove away or archive  Gorbachev = opening of archives, press debates o Criticize everyone!  Contemporary = normalized (more or less) Western Historiography of Soviet Russia  Cold War o "Know your enemy!" o Government funded research into the Soviet Union o McCarthyism  1st phase revisionism (60s and 70s)  2nd phase revisionism (80s)  Post-Soviet Russia before 1917 (mostly 1905 Revolution)  85% peasants  Undergoing made-up modernization HIS351 – September 17, 2012 2 o Economic and social o Undertaken by the government  Repressive government, small ruling class, small alienated intellectual elite that was anti- regime that was held out of the big ugly bureaucracy (since the 1830s)  The country was very dependent on the big ineffective bureaucratic machine  Russia was ruled by an autocracy with few rules that were arbitrary and repressive because the leader was not held accountable by anyone but himself  First Rule of the Constitutional Laws o As close to a constitution as Russia got o Tsar is absolute in all the Russias, he is as close to God on earth and you can get and therefore people should be grateful that he ruled over them  Nicholas II (1894 - 1917) o Believed in sacred duty o Devoted to family o Personally weak (i.e. Rasputin and his wife) o Showed that autocracy is weak and ridiculous because it is based on one guy and this guy sucked  Small social base that was mostly/only nobles though there were some merchants  The autocracy was convinced that Russia needed to go through economic reforms  Highly agrarian economy  Russia needed to untie the serfs from the land in order to do anything with their economy  Growing industrial sector  Peasant migration to cities o When the serfs were freed and became peasants they went from paying their owners to paying the state through their peasant communes  State funding of industry o Led by Sergei Witte, minister of finance o Came about when they realized that just freeing the serfs wouldn't be enough because the peasants were still tied (though more loosely) to the land  Heavy taxation of rural economy o Peasants were the biggest taxpayers o "Russian industrialization was floated on a sea of vodka"  Terrible poverty  Improving the lives of people wasn't the biggest goal, the goal for industrialization was to improve and increase the power of the state  The state was the backbone for economic growth because there wasn't really a commerce and industry sector like their were in other nations (i.e. England and the rest of Europe) HIS351 – September 17, 2012 3  Undermined it's own social base because the conditions created made the peasants and workers hostile to the regime  Population o Russia was divided into estates  Peasants, nobles, clergy, townspeople, merchants, "people of various ranks"  Do not reflect realities o Large numbers of peasants tied to the land o Small number of workers (3 million approximately)  There was a chain/circle (BRACELET) system of migration o They migrated depending on the season and what needed to be done in the fields  There's also squabble about the differences between workers and peasants because it's not a solid distinction o Nobility (30, 000)  Alexander III created these "land captains" who were to keep stability and control in the countryside o Small middle class o Intelligentsia
More Less
Unlock Document
Subscribers Only

Only pages 1 and half of page 2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
Subscribers Only
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document
Subscribers Only

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit