NMC278H1 Lecture 8: LEC 8

3 Pages
83 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Near & Middle Eastern Civilizations
Course
NMC278H1
Professor
James Reilly
Semester
Fall

Description
Interwar Mandates in Iraq, Trans-Jordan, Syria and Lebanon  Other than Palestine not characterized by colonization and immigration  Mandates had characteristics in common o Relied on external support o Priority of establishments of local military, police forces, establish repressive apparatus o Find allies by exploiting ethnic, regional and religious differences o Identify cleavages in society and manipulate and exploit them o Both british and french mandates economic policies to keep european control over key economic interests o GB was stronger, could show more tactical movability  They give certain identified iraqis and handed over day to day stuff to them  In 1932 they felt confident enough to end the mandate system in Iraq  Allowed them to join the league o France weaker  Kept very tight administrative and military control  Kept it until collapse in WWII  Degree of french influence lingered in lebanon  But syria ended in WWII o British officials in Iraq typically those who had experience from India o French officials ussually people with experience in Algeria and Morroco o State building in Syria and Iraq preceded more or less from sratch o Less so in Lebanon o They tried to bring in syria and iraqis who served the ottoman government o Pool of trained people small, so had to recruit the former ottoman workers  Problem as these were some of the people who most strongly associate themselves as arab nationalists  As government officials believed in the modern state, wanted indigenous state  Euros needed these personel but they were often at odds  In the face of the opposition GB and france had to win them over  Main tactic was to play on differences in the people Faysal ibn Husayn o Son of sharif Husayn o Made him the king of Iraq in 1921 o Government was quite weak, gradually won support of political class o Most of iraq were sheas, but government mainly run by sunnis o Most people where sheas but people in power were sunnis o Country side turned over to tribal shaikes and land owners o Pushed for them to take sole ownership of land o Upto 25% where Kurdish and other speakers  Didn’t have much tie to the bagdad administration o 1924/25 british pressing faisal to sign treaty to allow foreign ownership of all oil/future oil in Iraq o In the end he had to give in, Iraq petroleum company, british, french, us ownership o Iraqi governments stuctural dependance meant that british confident in ending mandate, ended mandate in 1930 signaled end in 1932  Continuation of bases (mainly airbases) would stay  Iraqi foreign policy would align with british  Iraqi recognized the econom
More Less

Related notes for NMC278H1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit