Class Notes (836,367)
Canada (509,757)
Philosophy (1,521)
PHL240H1 (52)
Jim John (13)
Lecture

PHL240 Jan 30 and Feb 6 notes.docx

5 Pages
117 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Philosophy
Course
PHL240H1
Professor
Jim John
Semester
Winter

Description
January 30, 2013 Nagel and Williams  Nagel – non science fictional version of a thought experiment  Data about the human brain – brain divided into 2 cerebral hemispheres (left and right), connected by a band of tissue  Left controls reading and writing  See section 2 and the footnotes for these details  Split brain experiments  Information flow between the 2 brain hemispheres stops when the band of tissue connecting them is severed  Page 232 – Nagel describes some of the things observed  Split brain patient cannot distinguish a continuous from a discontinuous line  Nagel points out many the researchers took the data to show that these patients had 2 independent streams of consciousness  Each hemisphere seems to have its own impulses to act, perceptions, experiences, separate chain of memories  Splitting of 2 distinct streams of consciousness  Sperry‟s thought is that we enjoy a single stream of consciousness, but if we were to have our brain split we would have 2 separate streams of consciousness without knowing that we do  Is this interpretation plausible or correct?  How should we characterize what‟s happening to these patients with split brains?  Nagel says there are 5 possibilities:  1. The patients have a mind associated with the left hemisphere, and no mental activity at all associated with the right hemisphere (non-verbal hemisphere) – verbal powers indicative of mentality  2. The patients have a mind associated with the left hemisphere and associated with the non-verbal right hemisphere are events of degraded mental activity that have nothing to do with the mind  Neither a coherent mind  3. The patients have two minds, one with the left hemisphere, and another with the right (which can neither speak nor write)  4. Patients have a single mind that derives from both hemispheres in a disassociated way  5. Patients have a single normal mind in everyday life (without experimentation), which then splits into 2 as per option 3 when experimented on  Page 230-231  The philosophical problem is that none of the 5 options looks at all plausible (Nagel)  What‟s wrong with them? Nagel says 1 and 2 are no good because suppose the left hemisphere failed  If that happened we‟d have no difficulty ascribing a non-verbal mind and non- verbal activity to the right hemisphere  If the left went bad the right would still be there (rational behavior could still exist, just not with verbal behavior)  Number 3 is no good either because how can there be 2 minds when the 2 hemispheres are so well integrated in everyday life?  Doesn‟t see how given the fact that the patients behave normally outside the experiment, that we could say they have 2 distinct minds – maybe a single mind disassociated with itself?  Nagel says for number 4 it‟s extremely difficult to conceive what it‟s like to be a being with such a disassociated mind  Can‟t imaginatively put myself in the place of the patients with mind content at war with each other  In number 5, for such a drastic change to occur the experiment would have to bring up some kind of internal change in the patient, and it doesn‟t  The experiments tinkered with the relations between the brain and central nervous systems stand in relation to the environment  Nagel‟s cases against these options differ, for number 4 it is based on the inability to imagine such things, number 5 is based on the assumption that facts about conscious viewpoints are fixed by intrinsic features of the brain  Page 242 towards the end  “The fundamental problem of understanding these cases in mentalistic terms, we take ourselves as paradigms of psychology unity but we are unable to project ourselves into their lives”  We find ourselves baffled – this reveals that a concept of a unified self becomes problematic  Maybe we are unknowingly internally disassociated  Notion of consciousness is moving viewpoint in the world  Ground for non-science fictional case for Locke‟s body swapping case  Switching brain hemispheres  Williams  Clash of worldviews backing Williams  Family of theories all inspired by Locke‟s discussion (psychological continuity theory of consciousness)  You are an ongoing stream of psychological continuity (stream of consciousness – you last as long as it lasts) – Lockean spirit  Williams says persons are their living bodies, not ongoing streams of consciousness  Personal identity over time consists in bodily identity over time  Tries to undermine a key element of the psychological continuity theory  Compare a wallet to the nation of Canada  What it means for the wallet to persist through time is that its body remains the same  What it means for Canada to persist through time? Via certain things or substances  There is no Canada substance – it persists in virtue of an ongoing stream of relations  As long as there are some people related in certain ways (stand in legal, political, socio-economic etc. relations)  Locke‟s views says that people are like Canada (you‟re around as long as something can post awareness)  Williams says this is wrong, we are a thing – we persist through time like the wallet  This is the clash of views February 6, 2013  Story 1 underlines sequence of events, suggests that 2 diametrically opposed views of personhood could work  Williams is betting on the body theory of story 2, more reflective of the underlying truth of what we are  Body theory of personhood and animal theory are different, but for Williams‟ purpose this doesn‟t matter  Williams wants to show that these thought experiments are not as persuasive as they seem  There are only 3 options on the table  2 different ways of telling the same story that implicates 2 different theories  Op
More Less

Related notes for PHL240H1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit