Class Notes (838,051)
Canada (510,627)
Philosophy (1,521)
PHL273H1 (27)
Lecture

Mackinnon and Lavallee

2 Pages
95 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Philosophy
Course
PHL273H1
Professor
Sophia Moreau
Semester
Summer

Description
TODAY’S LECTURE (PHL271H1F) June 6 , 2011 th 1.) Mackinnon + Feminism Dilemma - Dilemma of Feminist Theory - The law works to legitimate male power - 4 examples of this 2.) Lavallee case - Facts + issues in the case - The two requirements for self defense - Popular myths about these and Justice Wilson’s approach Liberals tend to emphasize how the law works towards fundamentally neutral rights. “The reasonable person” is mentioned. Mackinnon feels like notions such as “the reasonable person” have been used in ways that are not neutral and prevent women from being seen as equal. The leftist critique of the state recognizes the problem of this neutrality but thinks of law as a legitimating ideology. If all law is a tool of dominance and repression, there is no way it can be reclaimed for women. Is it possible to recognize the ways in which law has been used to legitimate male power, yet reclaim the law as a positive force for women’s betterment? The law works to legitimate male power Gender is a social system that divides power. Refer to pg. 263 and 261. The law makes it difficult to see and change many social inequalities. Mackinnon gives four examples of how the state undermines inequality in a bid to push for neutrality. The first example refers to the constitution (America). Only if the state has done something then can the law offer a remedy. In Canada under the charter, you can only bring your charter issue only if there are any judicial bodies involved. The second example involves the prioritization in the law of negative freedom over positive freedom. Philosophers have tried to distinguish btw types of freedom. Negative freedom deals with freedom from interference e.g. others cannot affect your intentions. Positive freedom tends to involve the freedom in doing things that one thinks are valuable e.g. freedom to achieve your goals. In order to have positive freedom, one may need assistance from others or the state. Mackinnon’s point here is that if a govt does this, it will be leaving certain citizens like women from complete freedom. Women who lack opportunities will not benefit from negative freedom. This will prevent them from being on equal with the dominant groups in society. Maternalistic labour laws are mentioned on 265 of the textbook. The cases involved:
More Less

Related notes for PHL273H1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit