Class Notes (835,384)
Canada (509,147)
Philosophy (1,521)
PHL275H1 (146)
Lecture

Kantian Ethics.doc

4 Pages
125 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Philosophy
Course
PHL275H1
Professor
Joseph Boyle
Semester
Summer

Description
Kantian Ethics The Categorical Imperative Revisited Nelson 415-419 • one basic categorical moral law: the Universalization Principle • acting on a good will does not require acting without inclination • Kant has not shown that categorical imperatives are the basis of morality • it still might be so even if he doesn’t show it • we need to employ a procedure that is impartial among the different persons or interests involved • illness example cannot be willed as a universal law • not at every opportunity, under these circumstances, one could will his maxim of saving her life as a universal law • the principle also requires that we demand the same of ourselves that we demand of others • what if we are willing that others act a way towards us and others do not will that we act this same way towards them? • morally praiseworthy vs. morally correct Moral Luck – Thomas Nagel 441-452 • Kant: luck should not influence our moral judgment of a person • Nagel: we consider someone who has produced painful ends to be a worse person, even if he had the right intention, than someone who hasn’t produced those ends, Nagel says that they are equal • Kant: a bad will is morally irrelevant • K: people cannot be morally assessed for what is not their fault or beyond their control • Nagel: moral judgement is partly determined by external factors • what someone does depends on factors beyond their control • we continue to judge people morally • nothing or almost nothing that a person does is under his control • 1) constituitive luck: the kind of person one is (inclinations, capacities, temperament) • 2) luck in one’s circumstances • moral judgement dependent on outcome of luck • running a red light, hitting a person vs. not, one situation is considered more morally wrong than the other • leaving a baby in a bath with running water, the baby drowning vs. not • moral verdict depends on results • problem: these examples have no moral worth in the first place and Kant’s philosophy deals primarily with cases of moral worth, I do not think that Kant’s philosophy is about morally wrong intentions as much as it is about morally right • Kant: moral irrelevance of qualities of temperament that are not under the control of the will • Nagel’s criticism: a person can be greedy, envious, cowardly, cold, and ungenerous but behave perfectly by a monumental effort of the will • I think that Kant presupposes that in order to have a good will, it is obvious that you possess certain virtues to recognize the importance of the will • How can you be a fully greedy person if you are committed to moral duty? • Nagel: moral judgements arise from what one does but what he does results from a great deal that he does not do (responsible for what he is and is not responsible for) • moral judgement of a person is a judgment of HIM and not what happens to him Kant on the Good Will: The rejection of goods-based ethics • The only thing that is unconditionally good is a good will • 1) unconditional: it is good in itself regardless of circumstance • 2) good will: morally correct choices • other “talents of the mind”, e.g. intelligence, wit, courage, or “gifts of fortune”, e.g. power, riches, health, well-being, and also happiness, can be both good and bad if there is no good will involved • a life of morality is a rational
More Less

Related notes for PHL275H1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit