Class Notes (838,704)
Canada (511,053)
Philosophy (1,521)
PHL370H1 (4)
Lecture

Jan 9.doc
Premium

2 Pages
77 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Philosophy
Course
PHL370H1
Professor
Mark Schranz
Semester
Winter

Description
PHL370 Lecture #2 th Jan 9 Different Kinds of Rights - there are a number of different kinds of things we seem to mean when we say that we ‘have a right to do something’ - each of these kinds of utterances has a different shape (or internal structure) o different parties involved, do different things What is the right to free speech? - the multiple meanings of right can be observed even with respect to a supposedly singular right, such as the right to free speech (with respect to a particular issue) o 1. A is legally entitled to say whatever they want with respect to issue X, but so long as B does A no criminal wrong, B can do whatever B wants to prevent A from effectively expressing their opinion o 2. A is legally entitled to say whatever they want about X and B is legally barred from preventing A from speaking about X o 3. same as 2, but in addition there is no one that has the ability to relax the legal barriers preventing B from interfering with A’s speech o 4. same as 2, but in addition C has the ability to relax the legal restrictions on B o 5. A has the right to say what they want about X, but D has the right to create a legal block against A speaking about X whenever D wants Contractual Rights - contractual rights can be even more difficult to figure out o 1. Bob hires SuperLawn to cut his grass for Summer 2013  what if they do a shitty job? o 2. Jane hires Bert to take care of her cat while she is out of town  if he does not feed the cat for 4 days, who has he done wrong (break duty) to? – law will say not done wrong to the cat, but only to Jane because the contract is with Jane  what if Bert had to take care of Jane’s son, not cat – the son is harmed insofar Bert did not do what he was supposed to • but the son is not harmed (no legal wrong – according to law) • debate between interest and will theory • interest theory: but the son’s rights were violated as well because he was harmed (neglect, etc.) • will theory: it’s obvious that Jane’s rights were violated, only hers because it is a contract between HER Some Lessons - right has a number of different me
More Less

Related notes for PHL370H1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit