PHL273H1 Lecture Notes - Harm Principle, Fundamental Justice, General Idea

30 views2 pages
Published on 17 Nov 2011
School
Department
Course
Professor
TODAY’S LECTURE (June 20 th
, 2011)
1.) The Harm Principle in Canadian Law: (a) Background to R. vs. Malmo-Levine,
(b) Majority: Should the harm principle be a “principle of fundamental justice?”
NO (c) Dissent: Should the principle “The criminal law cannot imprison someone
who has done nothing wrong” be a p.f.j.? YES (p.f.j = principle of fundamental
justice)
2.) Introduction to equality
- Why care that governments treat citizens equally?
3.) Charles Taylor – 2 conceptions of equal treatment
I) The politics of equal dignity
II) The politics of difference
4.) Canadian approach: “the” dignity based approach
Pg. 331 (Hart thinks that the very idea that there can be a general idea of one
principle governing behaviour may just be too simple).
Why would it matter to treat people equally?
- To promote equal opportunities e.g. job opportunities
- Giving everyone certain basic liberties e.g. freedom of thought, expression and
religion
- To promote the idea that everyone is of equal worth or dignity
- Apply the same laws the same way to everyone
- Recognizing cultural differences and compensating for historical disadvantage
- Eliminating discrimination (might involve elimination of prejudice and
stereotyping)
CHARLES TAYLOR
The politics of equal dignity talks about a universal human potential. Everyone is
given the same sets of rights.
The politics of difference mentions that our very different actual identities and
cultures are worthy of respect. The politics of difference says we need to recognize that
certain groups need special treatment. Proponents of the politics of equal dignity argue
that politics of difference ignore minorities within minorities. Also, they say that politics
of difference excessively favour certain groups out of the pretence of respect. Proponents
of politics of difference say that it is very difficult to determine who should be deciding
the rules which are to be followed in relation to the politics of equal dignity.
Dignity based approach
1.) There has to be something the government has done to exclude the claimant.
Unlock document

This preview shows half of the first page of the document.
Unlock all 2 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

The harm principle in canadian law: (a) background to r. vs. malmo-levine, (b) majority: should the harm principle be a principle of fundamental justice? . Charles taylor 2 conceptions of equal treatment. 331 (hart thinks that the very idea that there can be a general idea of one principle governing behaviour may just be too simple). To promote equal opportunities e. g. job opportunities. Giving everyone certain basic liberties e. g. freedom of thought, expression and. To promote the idea that everyone is of equal worth or dignity. Apply the same laws the same way to everyone. Recognizing cultural differences and compensating for historical disadvantage. Eliminating discrimination (might involve elimination of prejudice and religion stereotyping) The politics of equal dignity talks about a universal human potential. Everyone is given the same sets of rights. The politics of difference mentions that our very different actual identities and cultures are worthy of respect.

Get OneClass Grade+

Unlimited access to all notes and study guides.

YearlyMost Popular
75% OFF
$9.98/m
Monthly
$39.98/m
Single doc
$39.98

or

You will be charged $119.76 upfront and auto renewed at the end of each cycle. You may cancel anytime under Payment Settings. For more information, see our Terms and Privacy.
Payments are encrypted using 256-bit SSL. Powered by Stripe.