Class Notes (922,233)
CA (542,774)
UTSG (45,887)
PHL (1,579)
PHL378H1 (23)
Tom Hurka (23)
Lecture 11

LEC11 – Humanitarian Intervention Oct 15 2009

2 Pages
138 Views

Department
Philosophy
Course Code
PHL378H1
Professor
Tom Hurka

This preview shows half of the first page. Sign up to view the full 2 pages of the document.
PHL378: War & Morality
LEC11 Humanitarian Intervention
Oct, 15th, 2009
! Waltzer: pg.101-102
! clear examples of pure humanitarian intervention is rare, usually its a mixed motives
! humanitarian intervention lacks territorial control as opposed to civil war, and there is not 2
political entities
! hence Waltzer says we should remain neutral in the second case (civil war) and not the first
one
! Waltzer: pg. 90
2 conditions for humanitarian intervention are allowed: enslavement / massacre
restrictive view
later added: ethnic cleansing (forced evacuations of ppl from their homes)
disagree with Luben on Nicuragura case
Millian Conception of Self Determination
! Waltzer reply to Luben
! it was better for US to not intervene b/c that way the insurgents could build up their
government them selves
! Luben says
even though self determination is one good thing, if we weight it against the harms it is
not always desirable
ie. by not intervening, we have lost many lives, and the government that formed later is
less effective, and the old government had more time to strip resources of country
Humanitarian Intervention & Civil War
! mainly different but some similarities
! similarity: there is political change in both cases
Luben & Just Cause for War
! a JW is a war fought in defence of basic rights
! basic rights: minimal rights for a person to enjoy other rights
! basic rights are of individuals
! basic rights include both negative rights (not to be killed), and positive rights (to have food,
water, shelter)
! JC of war would be food
! Waltzer recognizes only violation negative rights as a justification of war (restrictive)
! Luben recognize both negative and positive rights for justification for war (least restrictive)
! these are 2 extreme views
! aggressors are violating political self determination
! war is just if
! 1. fought in defence of socially basic rights (subject to proportionality)
! 2. fought in defence of an unjust war
! Iceland case
! iceland fired on British boats who were fishing on iceland fishing borders
! Waltzer's response to Luben's contract
! all that matters is that
! Algerian ex. and Swiss Chemical
www.notesolution.com

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Description
PHL378: War & Morality LEC11 Humanitarian Intervention Oct, 15th, 2009 Waltzer: pg.101-102 clear examples of pure humanitarian intervention is rare, usually its a mixed motives humanitarian intervention lacks territorial control as opposed to civil war, and there is not 2 political entities hence Waltzer says we should remain neutral in the second case (civil war) and not the first one Waltzer: pg. 90 2 conditions for humanitarian intervention are allowed: enslavement massacre restrictive view later added: ethnic cleansing (forced evacuations of ppl from their homes) disagree with Luben on Nicuragura case Millian Conception of Self Determination Waltzer reply to Luben it was better for US to not intervene bc that way the insurgents could build up their government them selves Luben says even though self determination is one good thing, if we weight it against the harms it is not always desirable ie. by not intervening, we have lost many lives, and the government that formed later is less effective, and the old government had more tim
More Less
Unlock Document


Only half of the first page are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit