11 views3 pages
Political Science September 20th, 2010.
PART I: DEMOCRACY AND DICTATORSHIP
Constant and the Rise of Liberalism
Reading: Benjamin constant,The Liberty of Ancients compared with that of Moderns
Benjamin Constant (1767-1830):
Swiss born, French intellectual and politician
Fervent liberal
Context: French Revolution and its aftermath
People wanted democracy (never existed before) = classical antiquity by reason
Constant rejects it (the model of Greek democracy/politics)—is not applicable to
the circumstances under which we are living
Believed that they had a conception of freedom in ancient Greece, but their
conception was particular to it
Question: how should free people govern themselves?
Model Rejected
No form of government to turn to after French Revolution
They have a conception of freedom in ancient Greece
Liberty of Ancients:
Greek democracy is highly participatory, meaning on all important decisions, the
entire citizenry took part—direct
Today we elect representatives, however Greeks point of democracy is not through
elections; you directly partook, you directly discussed the existing legislation
Politics viewed as something which you wanted to do; wanted to govern yourself
The Greek conception of liberty was public (freedom of the collective, freedom of
the community, freedom to govern themselves)
Did not include private freedoms
Greek conception of liberty: They themselves as a community would make
decisions for themselves, no dictator, no leader, etc
Freedom of the community – self government
Freedom is collective
Dependent upon a class of people who didnt engage in commerce or even work
Big decisions were decisions on war
Liberty of Moderns:
Liberty – public rights, not private rights (not rights of a person, e.g. to dress in
certain ways)
Not so much “freedom to” asfreedom from (Isiah Berlin)
Legal protections (protected from not your arbitory attacks, physical and also
legal, and intrusions by the state)—Limited government
Freedom is collective not individual
www.notesolution.com
Unlock document

This preview shows page 1 of the document.
Unlock all 3 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Reading: benjamin constant, the liberty of ancients compared with that of moderns . Benjamin constant (1767-1830): swiss born, french intellectual and politician, fervent liberal, context: french revolution and its aftermath. people wanted democracy (never existed before) = classical antiquity by reason. constant rejects it (the model of greek democracy/politics) is not applicable to the circumstances under which we are living. no form of government to turn to after french revolution. they have a conception of freedom in ancient greece. If we don"t become actively politically engaged, the entire government may come crashing down. Traditional society: scarcity vast majority were farmers, they only grew what they ate, they weren"t geared towards the market, people lived subsistent lives. Definition: public administration, creation of modern state: example louis xiv, taxation and system of personal retainers of king who competed with local lords for power. This becomes modern bureaucracy: out of this comes the idea of sovereignty .

Get access

Grade+20% OFF
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers