Class Notes (923,248)
CA (543,180)
UTSG (45,887)
POL201Y1 (221)
Lecture

Imperialism and Dependency

4 Pages
80 Views

Department
Political Science
Course Code
POL201Y1
Professor
Sophia Moreau

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 4 pages of the document.
POL201 October 18, 2010
Imperialism and Dependency
Critique of modernization theory – Lenins Imperialism. The division of world among the
superpower were complete in 1916. Monopoly capitalism is opposite of free competition. Lenin
argues that Colonialism is not only for extraction of resources, but rather to get the control of the
resources. Capitalism was already on the decline. Cheap sources of raw materials were done by
having monopolies.
Colonial expansion – the resource extraction was the primary reason or the colonialism.
Fundamental critique of modernization theory – economic relationship, 19century, sets up the
lasting relationship of whats happening today.
Highlight of specific parts of modernization theory for critique – built on division of world of
traditional modern society. The tradition derives modernity. Modernization theory uses tradition
as both an expression and a cause of underdevelopment. Everything that is modern is opposition
built in Tradition society: Social mobility/hierarchical rigidity, Urban/Rural, Rational
people/Irrational people. In 1959 spring, political scientists researched about traditional society
in Turkey, Turkish peasants were hopelessly traditional and very poor. Later time, the very same
society, people voted for opposite party for the modernization goods. Lerners theory – he turns
out to be wrong.
Lerner thought there would be transition of traditional society to modern society, for comfort and
for own modern goods. He believed on personality traits and thought this was the reason for the
change.
How modernization theory uses the traditional theory dichotomy. It is used as a how world
develops. Early developer does it himself or herself and late developers learn from the modern
institution of the early developers. Modern human beings are rational and traditional are not
rational. By being rational, they do not engage in cultural, spiritual stuff, but believe in the
modern specifications.
Level of Analysis: Individual countries (Unit of analysis).
Dependency Theory (Valenzuela & Valenzuela) – Development and underdevelopment emerges
simultaneously. Development of the core produces the underdevelopment of periphery. Why –
unequal terms of trade. Modernity looks different in different countries is because the core and
periphery is different. Whether they are exporters or importers of primary goods and resources. It
depends where they stand in economy. Under and both developments are both are in modernity.
www.notesolution.com

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Description
POL201 October 18, 2010 Imperialism and Dependency Critique of modernization theory Lenins Imperialism. The division of world among the superpower were complete in 1916. Monopoly capitalism is opposite of free competition. Lenin argues that Colonialism is not only for extraction of resources, but rather to get the control of the resources. Capitalism was already on the decline. Cheap sources of raw materials were done by having monopolies. Colonial expansion the resource extraction was the primary reason or the colonialism. Fundamental critique of modernization theory economic relationship, 19century, sets up the lasting relationship of whats happening today. Highlight of specific parts of modernization theory for critique built on division of world of traditional modern society. The tradition derives modernity. Modernization theory uses tradition as both an expression and a cause of underdevelopment. Everything that is modern is opposition built in Tradition society: Social mobilityhierarchical rigidity, UrbanRural, Rational peopleIrrational people. In 1959 spring, political scientists researched about traditional society in Turkey, Turkish peasants were hopelessly traditional and very poor. Later time, the very same society, people voted for opposite party for the modernization goods. Lerners theory he turns out to be wrong. Lerner thought there would be transition of traditional society to modern society, for comfort and for own modern goods. He believed on personality traits and thought this was the reason for the change. How modernization theory uses the traditional theory dichotomy. It is used as a how world develops. Early developer does it himself or herself and late developers learn from the modern institution of the early developers. Modern human beings are rational and traditional are not rational. By being rational, they do not engage in cultural, spiritual stuff, but believe in the modern specifications. Level of Analysis: Individual countries (Unit of analysis). Dependency Theory (Valenzuela & Valenzuela) Development and underdevelopment emerges simultaneously. Development of the core produces the underdevelopment of periphery. Why unequal terms of trade. Modernity looks different in different countries is because the core and periphery is different. Whether they are exporters or importers of primary goods and resources. It depends where they stand in economy. Under and both developments are both are in modernity. www.notesolution.com
More Less
Unlock Document


Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit