Class Notes (904,357)
CA (538,249)
UTSG (45,718)
POL208Y1 (501)
Lecture

Today's march 8th lecture in case anyone missed it

7 Pages
131 Views

Department
Political Science
Course Code
POL208Y1
Professor
John Haines

This preview shows pages 1-2. Sign up to view the full 7 pages of the document.
March 8th 2011
HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION
End of cold war opened up room for human rights intervention around world
Failure to stop genocide in Rwanda lead to new interest in inter. Legal framework etc--R2P
policy
Duty for states is to protect human rights themselves
ICISS-initiative of Canada and other states-reports about r2p
Finished report day before 9/11 so agenda changed drastically
Said states have the primary responsibility to protect their citizens
When states are unable or unwilling to protect their citizens, leads to international R2p
Two failures were at the origin of the ICISS report:
1. Kosovo- Un security council at time couldn’t reach decision
2. Rwanda-not even a case of intervention b.c some UN troops were already there; not a
question of early warning or lack of info
The then boss of the peace keeping operation--Kofi Annam expressed the regret that the UN
was unable to shut down the radio in kigali that was calling for mass murder
Matter of reinforcing the troops that were already there and to change the mandate
Small contagion of belgian troops- 10 killed - Belgian foreign minister and Belgian leader at
time ordered military leader to leave even though 3 dozen rwandans will die
Left a huge mark on world
In US at time word genocide never used b/c carried with it obligation to do something
Rwanda was failure of inter. Community to intervene
800, 000 ppl. Killed in too months
At the end of the day its about decision makers making the right choice
Just on realism plus liberalism
Realists will doubt that there is something called universal right
Consider that these rights are the historic expression of one particular state or groups of states
No equivalent to an intern. Public prosecutor, claims about these rights are often distinguished
as other sets of intentions
Country claim it is acting in name of human rights when in fact its security etc acc. To realists
Realists-sovereignty is protection
Liberals
More concerned about human rights
Any foreign policy which wants to improve question of human rights is one fraught with
difficulties and dilemma
Risks falling into meaningless and abstract generalities
One thing to claim morality in foreign policy, another to base a foreign policy initiative on
moral grounds
Without transla. Of agenda into pragmatic and effective policies, runs risk of being one of
empty declaration and good intention
2. Risk of hypocrisy, double standards and inconsistency--why intervene there and not there
www.notesolution.com
The inconsistencies not only obvious in the cases you may chose, also evident in domestic
policies
3rd difficulty-the absence of domestic base for action
Ex. Not many demonstrations in favour of an intervention in Darfur
Most of the time a case has to be built, public opinion has to be convinced
On the other hand a public outcry could lead to inappropriate action, ignore local realities etc
Leaders intervening need:
Sound principle and effectiveness
The art of the possible
Tension between what you want to do and what you have the means to do
Morality of the objective is always relative
There is no universally accepted standards
Decision maker might be incompatible with anthers claim
No single inter. Moral code
^ leads to principle of self restraint
Unintended consequences of that action
Ex. You might consider that child labour in bangladesh might be stopped. It is a moral
imperative. Yet, without a proper educational system, such a prohibition could lead to
disastrous consequences
For every moral position you take there are always moral consequences
The current case of Libya--moral point of view, it makes sense to help the opposition to take
power and to keep kedafi out of power. How do you do that?
A direct intervention may not be welcomed from the local pop.
Indeed message we have gotten from opposition- is you will do more harm than good
What can we do to limit the power of destruction kedafi can unleash?
Idea: no fly zone---kedafi can’t bomb civilians
Military points out that first you would have to bomb their air military force and you may in
doing so trigger collateral damages and strengthen position of kedafi inside Libya
You may turn some part of the pop. Against you
Yet at the end of the day the moral choice is about avoiding massacre in libya
Do you wait for actual massacre to do something?
Can you act preventatively
Can you do it without the help of other countries?
All these questions create dilemmas
Not surprising issues of human rights are so diff. To tackle
Moral choice MUST be a pragmatic one
And yet over the years in Bosnia, rwanda, Congo, there is a matter of regularity in human
rights violation that leads us to disappear
Short attn. Span of media is that respect is always incredible
Specific case of humanitarian intervention-always a tough call-some have been successful,
most have been unsuccessful
Inter. Community is basically learning by doing
UN has changed way it does peacekeeping and intervention business
www.notesolution.com

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Description
March 8th 2011 HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION End of cold war opened up room for human rights intervention around world Failure to stop genocide in Rwanda lead to new interest in inter. Legal framework etc--R2P policy Duty for states is to protect human rights themselves ICISS-initiative of Canada and other states-reports about r2p Finished report day before 911 so agenda changed drastically Said states have the primary responsibility to protect their citizens When states are unable or unwilling to protect their citizens, leads to international R2p Two failures were at the origin of the ICISS report: 1. Kosovo- Un security council at time couldnt reach decision 2. Rwanda-not even a case of intervention b.c some UN troops were already there; not a question of early warning or lack of info The then boss of the peace keeping operation--KofiAnnam expressed the regret that the UN was unable to shut down the radio in kigali that was calling for mass murder Matter of reinforcing the troops that were already there and to change the mandate Small contagion of belgian troops- 10 killed - Belgian foreign minister and Belgian leader at time ordered military leader to leave even though 3 dozen rwandans will die Left a huge mark on world In US at time word genocide never used bc carried with it obligation to do something Rwanda was failure of inter. Community to intervene 800, 000 ppl. Killed in too months At the end of the day its about decision makers making the right choice Just on realism plus liberalism Realists will doubt that there is something called universal right Consider that these rights are the historic expression of one particular state or groups of states No equivalent to an intern. Public prosecutor, claims about these rights are often distinguished as other sets of intentions Country claim it is acting in name of human rights when in fact its security etc acc. To realists Realists-sovereignty is protection Liberals More concerned about human rights Any foreign policy which wants to improve question of human rights is one fraught with difficulties and dilemma Risks falling into meaningless and abstract generalities One thing to claim morality in foreign policy, another to base a foreign policy initiative on moral grounds Without transla. Of agenda into pragmatic and effective policies, runs risk of being one of empty declaration and good intention 2. Risk of hypocrisy, double standards and inconsistency--why intervene there and not there www.notesolution.com
More Less
Unlock Document


Only pages 1-2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit