Class Notes (920,947)
CA (542,408)
UTSG (45,870)
POL214Y1 (223)
Lecture

Charter of Rights and Freedoms

5 Pages
171 Views

Department
Political Science
Course Code
POL214Y1
Professor
Victoria Wohl

This preview shows pages 1-2. Sign up to view the full 5 pages of the document.
Canadian Politics: Week 8 t November 2nd, 2010
Possible test questions:
Different faces of federalism over the years.
How courts have influenced the evolution of federalism.
Charter of Rights and Freedoms (CRF)
1. Judicial Review of The Constitution
- The Constitution requires interpretation, role of courts
- Words, especially in the Charter, are elastic
- &Z}(}v(]}v]v[o]ÌZ}Á}]ÇÁ}µoÀ}oÀUZ}Á]vµ]ÀP}Àvuv
Á}µo}u]v}o[o]ÀUZ}Á}uoÆZ]vPÁ}µo}u
Section 7:
Singh (1985)
- Non-citizen landed in Canada, claimed to be a refugee, asked to leave
- Claimed that he was being denied principles of fundamental justice
- Supreme Court ruled that everyone in the world who sets foot in Canada has a right to
Section 7
Morgentaler (1988)
- Security of the person, can a woman have an abortion without being subject to the rules the
government had set up?
- ^µ]Ç}(Z}v]voµÁ}uv[]PZ}ZÀv}]}v
Borowski (1989)
- Everyone including the foetus should have a right to life, liberty, and security of the person
- Courts ruled that foetuses do not
- Constitution making is never complete, constantly evolving, requires interpretation
- Courts add flesh and bone to the Constitution through the rulings they make
- When a court makes a decision it becomes part of the constitutional law in Canada
- Approach to Constitution interpretation:
o Take it literally
o Look at context and spirit
o Defer to the legislature, defer to government
If government passes a law, go along with it
- Canadian courts now appear much more like American courts than British ones
www.notesolution.com
- Gone from a system of parliamentary supremacy before 1867, now we have full blown
constitutional supremacy
- 1982 Constitution dramatically broadened courts legitimacy
o Explicitly provides for judicial review, takes us to a stage of constitutional supremacy
o Can take government to court if think rights have been violated
- Why did we get a Charter?
o 1960, Bill of Rights
Courts took a limited interpretation of Bill of Rights
Bill of Rights }v[P]Àv]vvÇvÁ]PZU((]uZ]PZ
they already had by common law
Only applied to federal legislature
o Movement towards having a rights document in the aftermath of the Holocaust, UN
passed Universal Declaration on Human Rights
o 1õôîZ]v[iµ}(ooP]oµ
o Gave more rights to individuals and groups of individuals
o Charter challenges and accommodates supremacy of Charter
Challenges by spelling out rights people have, can take governments to
court if feel rights have been violated
}uu}U^]}ví^Á]Z]v}voo]u]_
x Also, Section 33, the notwithstanding clause, allows legislatures to
immunize themselves from certain parts of the Charter
o Can be used by federal and provincial parliaments
- JCPC
2. Public Opinion and the CRF
- Polls show that Canadians love the Charter
- Public opinion in support of the Charter is just as high in Quebec as in the rest of Canada
- Canadians favour the Charter because they trust judges and courts more than politicians,
journalists, media, Parliament
o In Canada, the courts are perceived as transparent, devoid of corruption, give
u]µo}µÀ]Á}(UiµPZ}vU}v[µ}ÁUv}]v](}
personal gain
- Public appreciates equality provisions, Section 15
o 90% of Charter cases deal with the rights of alleged criminals
- Public say they like the Charter, but when ask them specific questions, more than half want
to extend police powers even when civil rights of the accused are being violated
o Public has contradictory opinions, is hypocritical, is ignorant of details of the Charter
- Other reasons for Canadians being favourably disposed to the Charter:
o Charter is inherently progressive, broad interpretations of elastic terms are going to
lead to more progressive society
Rights in Charter very malleable
www.notesolution.com

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Description
Canadian Politics: Week 8 J November 2 , 2010 nd Possible test questions: Different faces of federalism over the years. How courts have influenced the evolution of federalism. Charter of Rights and Freedoms (CRF) 1. Judicial Review of The Constitution - The Constitution requires interpretation, role of courts - Words, especially in the Charter, are elastic - ZZ} }L]}L]L[o]Z}Z} ]}o}o7Z}]LZ]2}LKL }o }K]L}o[Zo]Z7Z} }KoZ]L2Z}o }K Section 7: Singh (1985) - Non-citizen landed in Canada, claimed to be a refugee, asked to leave - Claimed that he was being denied principles of fundamental justice - Supreme Court ruled that everyone in the world who sets foot in Canada has a right to Section 7 Morgentaler (1988) - Security of the person, can a woman have an abortion without being subject to the rules the government had set up? - ^ ]}ZZ}L]L oZ}KL[Z]2Z}ZL}]}L Borowski (1989) - Everyone including the foetus should have a right to life, liberty, and security of the person - Courts ruled that foetuses do not - Constitution making is never complete, constantly evolving, requires interpretation - Courts add flesh and bone to the Constitution through the rulings they make - When a court makes a decision it becomes part of the constitutional law in Canada - Approach to Constitution interpretation: o Take it literally o Look at context and spirit o Defer to the legislature, defer to government If government passes a law, go along with it - Canadian courts now appear much more like American courts than British ones www.notesolution.com
More Less
Unlock Document


Only pages 1-2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit