Class Notes (1,100,000)
CA (650,000)
UTSG (50,000)
Political Science (3,000)
POL214Y1 (200)
Victoria Wohl (40)
Lecture
Department
Political ScienceCourse Code
POL214Y1Professor
Victoria WohlThis preview shows page 1. to view the full 5 pages of the document.
Canadian Politics: Week 8 t November 2nd, 2010
Possible test questions:
Different faces of federalism over the years.
How courts have influenced the evolution of federalism.
Charter of Rights and Freedoms (CRF)
1. Judicial Review of The Constitution
- The Constitution requires interpretation, role of courts
- Words, especially in the Charter, are elastic
- &๎๎Z๎๎๎๎}(๎๎}v(๎๎๎๎๎๎]}v๎๎]๎v[๎๎๎๎๎o]ร๎๎Z}ร๎๎}๎]๎๎ร๎ร}ยตo๎๎๎ร}oร๎U๎Z}ร๎]v๎๎ยต๎]ร๎๎P}ร๎๎vu๎v๎๎
ร}ยตo๎๎๎๎๎}u๎๎]v๎๎๎}๎o๎[๎๎o]ร๎๎U๎Z}ร๎๎}u๎o๎ร๎๎Z]vP๎๎ร}ยตo๎๎๎๎๎}u๎
Section 7:
Singh (1985)
- Non-citizen landed in Canada, claimed to be a refugee, asked to leave
- Claimed that he was being denied principles of fundamental justice
- Supreme Court ruled that everyone in the world who sets foot in Canada has a right to
Section 7
Morgentaler (1988)
- Security of the person, can a woman have an abortion without being subject to the rules the
government had set up?
- ^๎๎ยต๎]๎ร๎}(๎๎Z๎๎๎๎๎๎}v๎]v๎oยต๎๎๎๎ร}u๎v[๎๎๎]PZ๎๎๎}๎Z๎ร๎๎๎v๎๎๎}๎๎]}v
Borowski (1989)
- Everyone including the foetus should have a right to life, liberty, and security of the person
- Courts ruled that foetuses do not
- Constitution making is never complete, constantly evolving, requires interpretation
- Courts add flesh and bone to the Constitution through the rulings they make
- When a court makes a decision it becomes part of the constitutional law in Canada
- Approach to Constitution interpretation:
o Take it literally
o Look at context and spirit
o Defer to the legislature, defer to government
๎ If government passes a law, go along with it
- Canadian courts now appear much more like American courts than British ones
www.notesolution.com
You're Reading a Preview
Unlock to view full version
Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.
- Gone from a system of parliamentary supremacy before 1867, now we have full blown
constitutional supremacy
- 1982 Constitution dramatically broadened courts legitimacy
o Explicitly provides for judicial review, takes us to a stage of constitutional supremacy
o Can take government to court if think rights have been violated
- Why did we get a Charter?
o 1960, Bill of Rights
๎ Courts took a limited interpretation of Bill of Rights
๎ Bill of Rights ๎}๎๎v[๎๎P]ร๎๎๎๎v๎๎]๎v๎๎๎vร๎v๎ร๎๎]PZ๎๎U๎iยต๎๎๎๎((]๎u๎๎๎Z๎๎๎]PZ๎๎๎
they already had by common law
๎ Only applied to federal legislature
o Movement towards having a rights document in the aftermath of the Holocaust, UN
passed Universal Declaration on Human Rights
o 1รตรดรฎ๎๎Z๎๎๎๎๎๎๎]๎v[๎๎iยต๎๎๎๎๎๎oร๎๎}๎(๎๎๎๎๎o๎o๎P]๎o๎๎ยต๎๎
o Gave more rights to individuals and groups of individuals
o Charter challenges and accommodates supremacy of Charter
๎ Challenges by spelling out rights people have, can take governments to
court if feel rights have been violated
๎ ๎๎๎}uu}๎๎๎๎๎U๎^๎๎๎]}v๎รญ๎^ร]๎Z]v๎๎๎๎๎}v๎๎o๎๎o]u]๎_
x Also, Section 33, the notwithstanding clause, allows legislatures to
immunize themselves from certain parts of the Charter
o Can be used by federal and provincial parliaments
- JCPC
2. Public Opinion and the CRF
- Polls show that Canadians love the Charter
- Public opinion in support of the Charter is just as high in Quebec as in the rest of Canada
- Canadians favour the Charter because they trust judges and courts more than politicians,
journalists, media, Parliament
o In Canada, the courts are perceived as transparent, devoid of corruption, give
u๎๎]๎ยตo}ยต๎๎๎๎ร]๎ร๎}(๎๎๎๎๎๎U๎iยต๎P๎๎๎๎๎๎๎Z}v๎๎๎U๎๎}v[๎๎๎๎ยต๎๎๎๎}ร๎๎U๎v}๎๎]v๎]๎๎(}๎๎
personal gain
- Public appreciates equality provisions, Section 15
o 90% of Charter cases deal with the rights of alleged criminals
- Public say they like the Charter, but when ask them specific questions, more than half want
to extend police powers even when civil rights of the accused are being violated
o Public has contradictory opinions, is hypocritical, is ignorant of details of the Charter
- Other reasons for Canadians being favourably disposed to the Charter:
o Charter is inherently progressive, broad interpretations of elastic terms are going to
lead to more progressive society
๎ Rights in Charter very malleable
www.notesolution.com
You're Reading a Preview
Unlock to view full version