Class Notes (865,678)
CA (523,035)
UTSG (45,169)
POL224Y1 (89)
Lecture

POL 224 week 7 Lec Oct 31, 2012.doc

4 Pages
45 Views

Department
Political Science
Course Code
POL224Y1
Professor
Rodney Haddow

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 4 pages of the document.
Description
POL 224 week 8 Lec Oct 30, 2012 Constitution Continued Judiciary and the Rule of Law -courts authoritatively interpret law -‘stare decisis’ precedent basis -make ‘common law’ in process -courts can make law, define law for it and for any inferior court -ex. whether or not a 13 year old can be charged for breaking a window with a ball -they either recognize that he was old enough to know better or not -after that, a precedent is set -courts interpret the law and embellish it when there is an ambiguity -rule of law works differently in the US and UK UK (unwritten Constitution) -courts interpret common law and thereby remake it -embellish the law -also interpret/ embellish statutes (from parliament) -but parliamentary system means statute law is ‘trump’ -parliament remains supreme/ sovereign -statute law trumps common law -courts must yield to new parliamentary law -relatively easy to change/ reverse laws made by the courts -most courts work this way except the EU -executive prerogative also is trumped by statutes but persist -in the British (Canadian) tradition, executive (crown, cabinet, etc.) have the right to avoid the authorization of a statute/ do not need consent to prorogue parliament -legislature is not dissolved (also a prerogative) but suspended -all business of the house is abandoned -house stops sitting -convention is that the cabinet goes to the gov. gen to request prerogative POL 224 week 8 Lec Oct 30, 2012 -most prerogative powers belong to cabinet except for reserve powers US (written Constitution) -as in UK, US courts interpret/ embellish common law and statute law but also much more -written constitution trumps statutes/ legislature -the US supreme court is the grand interpreter of the constitution -the courts defend/ protect the constitution -end up embellishing the constitution like common law and statutes -ex. no limit on campaign advertisment funding so corporations/ individuals can pretty much buy elections -citizen’s united case (2010), you are just limited on spending the money on the candidates themselves -can rule statutes ultra vires (beyond the powers of- no state can make of law of this kind because it violates the constitution) re. 2, 3 (federalism provision), or 4 -courts trumped only by constitutional amendment -difficult to amend the constitution -need to pass a motion through both houses of congress, and both senate and house assemblies of 3/4 of the states -last time this happened was the 1960’s civil right
More Less
Unlock Document
Subscribers Only

Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
Subscribers Only
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document
Subscribers Only

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit