Class Notes (835,243)
Canada (509,044)
JPA331Y1 (32)
Lecture

Jan 14 2014 Lecture Notes.dot

3 Pages
100 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Political Science
Course
JPA331Y1
Professor
Lynette Ong
Semester
Winter

Description
Jan 14 2014 State- Urban Workers Relations JPA 331 Y Phases: Collectivist pre-reform period reforms implemented in early 70’s late 80’s. Danwei (work system): - Function?  Political institution that extends party’s influence to grass roots level - It’s also a production unit and economy producer profits handed to the state - Provides social welfare (housing, health care, pensions) - Uncommon to switch between Danweis - This impedes labour mobility, as life time employment hinges on the system 2 period, 1978-1992 Dual Pricing System: - State owned enterprises have quotas to fulfill, and after fulfilling SOE’s (state owned enterprises) can sell the excess at market prices - As a result, decline in proportion of goods. Market outgrew the state - 1987 govt introduced variety of contracts under contract responsibility system (equivalent is household responsibility system: agricultural reform individual households are responsible for the inputs and outputs unlike collectivization - Fiscal system decentralized in 80’s central govt decentralized to various local govts (previous lecture) - Before 80’s, central gov’t would provide direct fiscal subsidies to SOE’s. But after fiscal decent, fiscal capacity of central government diminished and so couldn’t afford this anymore. As a result Banks (state owned) popped up at this time. - In the beginning each bank had a specific purpose. - Banks at the time are not banks in the modern sense, in a communist country the banks are just tools of the state. They are not there to make a profit, but they are there to allocate resources/ money in specific areas - They were mainly set up to finance state owned enterprises. - Loans were soft loans in the 80s. - Where do the banks get money?--> ordinary households - SOE’s subsidized by the people via the banks. - At this time, incentives were also introduced without ownership reforms moreover: - Township and village enterprises (very small) began to rise exponentially around China 3 period 1993-2003 - Agricultural reform encountered least political opposition - SOE’S reform however is more difficult, employs thousands of people, and ministries and bureaucracies depend on SOE for revenue. People may get laid off, infrastructure would suffer. - Company law was enacted in 1993. Provided legal underpinning for company ownership, compared to SOE’s. - This division laid the foundation for privatization - Downsizing and reconstruction of SOE’s in 1997 allowing the constitutions to recognize role of private institutions due to SOE reforms, therefore a lot of private enterprises had to be allowed and set up - 15 communist party congress “focus on the large, let go of the small”. - policy introduced to policy makers, focused on larger enterprises (controlled by central government) - Party willing to let go of small state enterprises in townships and prov. Govt’s. - This coincides with different levels of ownership - All the enterprises in china owned by the state and this was a huge burden. However in 1997 due to letting go of smaller state owned enterprises, it was easier. - This resulted in a lot of layoffs as well - State used to employ a lot of people and now its share has
More Less

Related notes for JPA331Y1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit