Class Notes (834,819)
Canada (508,737)
POL101Y1 (1,148)
Lecture

Feb 28 2011

4 Pages
94 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Political Science
Course
POL101Y1
Professor
Nelson Wiseman
Semester
Winter

Description
POL356Y1- Lecture Feb. 28, 2011 • Federal and Provincial Parties and Party Systems • Nunavut and Northwest territories do not have parties • Connections between provincial and federal parties • In 19 century federal parties more powerful than provincial parties because the federal government was more powerful than the provincial government • In Atlantic Canada the liberals and conservatives embraced these terms to connect themselves to the federal parties • In NB for example there are references to conservatives and liberals, but in the legislative they only used governing and opposition • Provincial party system different from federal- provincial societies are different, economies different, histories different- thus for example if we compare Saskatchewan and NFL • They all share in common one thing with federal- all operate under Westminster model – and also in all of these jurisdictions- what they also share with federal government- all use first past the post- single member plurality system • Federalism leads to dual images of the parties- it also suggests they can have dual policies • Major policy election in 1988 over free trade • The Alberta conservatives were against national energy program- Ontario conservatives were for it • Alberta Conservatives against Charter of rights and freedom..others for it • Today what’s the liberal policy on corporate taxes- Federal liberals against it- Ontario liberals are introducing it • There are conflicting images of the parties- look at last election • Provincial not inferior to federal parties • Internal operations of parties structure are parallel to the Canadian system of government • Provincial parties are autonomous and independent • When we look at Party members and party activists- we may have party activists conservatives- who are just oriented to provincial politics and not involved in federal- then we may have other who are just oriented to federal politics- others who see themselves as conservatives or liberal both federal and provincial • The relations between the two (fed prov) parties are heavily influences by which one of them is in power or if both or neither are in power • If the federal parties in power- a weak provincial party will be dependent on the federal and vice versa- influenced by weather one is in power or not in power or if both are in power • It’s difficult to convert the party machinery from one level to the other level- not all liberal parties are the same and so on • 2 Models of Federal -Provincial party relations • We can use 6 criteria (or 7) to determine the federal provincial party relations • Integrated versus confederal partiers and party systems • First you look at voters support-integrated- the same people vote for the same parties on both levels – if there is a shift from one to the other at the federal level they also switch so their integrated • Second criteria –Party organization- parties with the same label use the same machinery- same offices- same meetings- same membership lists to nominate executives on both levels- if they do this it is an integrated party- there would be a party mechanism in place that would have authority over the party on both levels • Third criteria- look at party careers- whether the leaders the people elected in parties go across levels or don’t- a lot of examples of both- is there an easy movement from one level to another- easy movement between federal and provincial • Fourth criteria- look at finance- where it gets its money- how it gets it and what it does with its money- do people contribute to the party as such or to the federal or provincial- if they contribute to the party as such the party will have internal mechanisms as to how the money is dispersed- we have a law that you have to give money to either provincial or federal- and they can give to each other- transfer money from federal to provincial and vice versa- suggests integrated- if they hold on to it suggest otherwise • Fifth criteria- parties ideologies and policies- integrated party- the party would have the same policies same principals and philosophies federal and provincially- if it’s not integrated they can have different policies and different positions • Sixth criteria - party symmetry- does the party compete in elections both federally and provincially – if it does i t suggests integrated party system- if it doesn’t it suggests confederal • Confederal party system is exact opposite of integrated party • Look at voters support for confederal- the base of support for the parties are different bodies of voters- if there’s a shift at any level it doesn’t mean that the other level will shift also • Party organization- in confederate – co
More Less

Related notes for POL101Y1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit