Class Notes (836,371)
Canada (509,758)
POL200Y1 (263)
Lecture

Lecture2.docx

4 Pages
59 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Political Science
Course
POL200Y1
Professor
Clifford Orwin
Semester
Fall

Description
Lecture2 - The significance of Socrates objection to Cephalus – who’s perception is justice as telling the truth. - Expect our version of justice to help the good, not the bad. However, the problem becomes when the bad man make use of the concept, where all respect for private property etc – has become conditional on something else. - If we don’t what is good for us, does justice require others to respect our title to it? Is justice just a term that remains significant if used? - Polemarchus provides a new version of justice – a new definition if you will. - Cephalus takes the grateful exit from the conversation after being defeated in the conversation through the Socratic method employed. - The intervention of Polemarchus comes at the expense of his respect for his father – due to loyalty, fulfilling his role as Cephalus’ heir. - Do we understand justice as selfless – or do we just expect to reap some sort of return from it? - The reinterpretation of what is old and what may now be relevant or legal – portrayal through friends. - Just to harm them (the friends) who are required to do good as well as experience good. - Friends who are owed what is good – enemies are owed what is bad. The equivalent exchange or justification of justice. - Also, now that Socrates has perceived this conclusion – Socrates believes justice as a craft. - Techne – the word, art or craft. Technically it means ‘technique’ – art as in ‘artisan’ versus ‘artist’ - Movement of Socrates strange – since justice is never typically associated with a craft. His basis from Polemarchus’ understanding that Justice is an art because justice is the activity of giving what is fitted. - Typically, the situation that concerns the involvement of justice typically involves some facet of craft, of technique, of fitting of knowledge by experts. - Justice as a form of expertise – therefore the just man is an artisan, an expert. - The fitting supplied by justice does not compromise the required, the fitting from friends despite the situational or the circumstantial. - Help is always held in a particular domain – therefore one must go to the domain which is relevant. - 332E – climax, which is directly relevant. :What about the just man?” Socrates central question. - Being an ally in battle, being a good friend, loyalty as the central characteristic. [Polemarchus] Clear case of harming an enemy, helping a friend. - In war, it is not the good things that only remain at risk – but everything - “One for all, all for one” – justice as devotion to the common good. The highest stakes, the greatest of dangers. - Socrates questions what justice is used for in peaceful times – for contracts, for partnerships, for deals – to create honest opponents, honest rivals. - Every contract however, is about something, it has a purpose which requires expertise. (Brings in a third party which cannot be identified?) Justice is useful when money is lying useless. - If justice not an art, then it is not up to the task of guarding or protection. [Vice versa] - Justice is identical with the art of guarding.; it is also identical with the art of stealing. - Art is a body of knowledge – guarding and stealing from it are one and the same. They usually end up going to the same expert. - The knowledge involved, the art is the same – “takes a thief to catch a thief” perspective - 330A-B: Line 31-40. - Socratic interlocutory – where Polemarchus feels the force of the objections, the contrasts. The consequence of accepting that justice is an art, is that this art is unidentifiable. - Therefore, follows on from the premise that justice is an art. - Guarding is an art – every body is a body of knowledge. - The problem is indemnifying justice – then identifying it. Every art is either just or unjust. - There is a clear distinct line of progress – in the pursuit of justice. - The knowledge remains neutral until used – depending on who is using it. - The art of justice remains ambigious due to the variation in the knowledge of the person, the expertise demanded from. [Scenario: the most effective detective would be the one who has the most knowledge, exposure of crime] - There is no variation, difference from the competent guardians – which makes us different from thieves. Therefore reinforcing the basic point of Socrates. - The basic point of his remains clear and but leaves us in the dark in the central sense for now. - Justice is therefore not an art – but instead a virtue, a character trait, an intention. - Justic
More Less

Related notes for POL200Y1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit