Class Notes (836,562)
Canada (509,854)
POL208Y1 (499)
Lecture

November 5.docx

4 Pages
85 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Political Science
Course
POL208Y1
Professor
Lilach Gilady
Semester
Fall

Description
November 5, 2012 International Crisis Continuation from War II Jus Ad Bellum  just cause-self defense (UN charter)  last resort  declared publicly by a legitimate authority; if not by a state actor = by law unjust  proportionality – benefit outweighs ……. Jus in Bello  Hague (1899,1970); Geneva (1949)  Discrimination – protecting civilians (Geneva; nuclear weapons? (detterence) anerial bombing (‘smart bombs’)? Terrorism)  Proportionality- double effect (agent orange) = not about the balance of casualties – an acts benefit needs to out weigh its costs/ bad efects Jus Post Bellum  Nuremberg; Milosevic; Rwanda; ICC; Saddam  Reparations  The ‘justice’ of the winners? – bias according to their opinions of whats just  Post war responsibilities- you brke it, you own it  Treatment of occupied territory and population  Just occupation? (Humanitarian interventions) Does it matter? Realists: at best what we see is organized hypocrisy (Krasner) However: decision makers and generals use the language of Just War Theory; Certain strategies of war are less acceptable today; Indication of changing norms? Changing technology? Does it affect policy? International Crisis  Why study crisis?  Most wars are preceded by crisis and escalation  If we want to understand war- we need to understand intentional crisis, and particularly decision making during crisis  If we wish to avoid war we need to improve crisis management skills What is and International Crisis?  Hermann- surprise, high level of threat, short decision time  Decision cube Situational vs. Behavioral Explanations  What affects the outcome of a crisis?  Situational (structural) variables: the structure of the crisis (decision cube), the nature of the conflict, the structure of the system  Behavioral variables: the quality of decision making and skill of decision makers Cuban Missile Crisis 1  1959 Castro takes over Cuba  November 1960 JFk elected  January 1961 Bay of Pigs  June 1962 USSR decides to introduce nuclear missiles to Cuba  16 October 1962 U2 images  crisis: surprise; limited time; threat  Ex- Comm: 20 senior decision makers; secret; constant meetings; JFK not a member; recordings; 13 days Possible American response:  Ignore the missiles  Diplomacy  Surgical bombing  Invasion blockade (nothing gets in or out of the country unless missiles removed) Allison’ three conceptual models  Rational, organizational, bureaucratic, and (Gilday adds cognitive)  Like levels of analysis- these models provide us with competing explanations for political outcomes- competing descriptions of the process of decision making Rational Model  Unitary actor  Same definition of rationality as in rational choice  Describes the process of decision making rather than the outcome  Collect information; list all policy altern
More Less

Related notes for POL208Y1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit