Class Notes (838,386)
Canada (510,872)
POL208Y1 (500)
Lecture

3-18-13.docx

4 Pages
57 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Political Science
Course
POL208Y1
Professor
Lilach Gilady
Semester
Winter

Description
 Environment - Tragedy of the Commons – collective action - Externalities - The problem of enforcement under anarchy - Lifeboats vs. Spaceship Earth - Limits to growth/the problems of exponential growth Neo-Malthusianism - The environment in IR (Stockholm, Montreal vs. Kyoto)  Climate Change Game? - No single country is big enough to change the outcomes Other Countries 2 2 Canada Cut CO Keep CO Cut CO 2 Avoid Climate change environmental disaster 2 Keep CO Avoid Climate change environmental disaster  Sustainable Development Rio, 1992 - United Nations Conference on Environment and Development Earth Summit - Sustainable development: “meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” (the Brundtland report, 1987) - A North-South compromise – development vs. conservation; who should play? Neo-colonialism? - Is it an oxymoron? - The United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development (New York) - What does it mean in practice? (Recycling, renewable energy – is it enough?)  NGO’s - Environmental NGO’s start to play an important international role in the mid 1970’s - John Muir – the Sierra Club (1901) - Greenpeace – the Rainbow Warrior  1985 sunk by French agents  1987 France agrees to pay $8.16 million compensation to Greenpeace  Proactive; provocative; media savvy; non-compromising; environment should always come first - NGO’s receive an official status of active observers (Rio); can’t vote but allowed to have international voices – changing the nature of the international law - Critique; NGO’s have their own interest affected by the issues of resources and money  Human Rights NGO’s - NGO’s become prominent when the formal state system seems to be unable to deal with specific challenges  Human rights also challenge the state system - Amnesty International (1961) – letter writing; prisoners of conscience; 1977 Nobel Peace Prize; annual report; broadened agenda - Human Rights Watch (1978) started as the Helsinki Watch; since 1998 all ‘Watches” are united under the HRW - Why is this issue so problematic? ‘Sovereignty’  Mostly the relationship between the citizen and the government  Human Rights as Part of Foreign Policy - Should we include human rights in our calculations? - A moral argument - Legal obligations - The Liberal argument: what happens inside the state is mirrored in its foreign policy - A political/function argument: human rights violations – destabilization – intervention – conflict - There is no inherent contradiction between human rights and national interest  Why not have a Human Rights Policy - Westphalia 1648  Institution of sovereignty; trying to prevent other countries from intervening with the domestic affairs - Morgenthau: the autonomy of the political sphere - It distorts national interest - It is an impossible policy: too broad, ineffective, too expensive - What does such policy mean (regime change? Short-term intervention? ‘Humanitarian Social Work’? Development?) e.g. China, Afghanistan, Syria - It will lead to inevitable ‘hypocrisy’ - Nothing more than ‘Realpolitik’?  Human Rights and International Law - With so many violations of human rights - can we think of them as part of international law? - Natural law – universal  Life, liberty, property (Lo
More Less

Related notes for POL208Y1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit