Class Notes (835,071)
Canada (508,910)
POL214Y1 (215)

Nov 19th 2012.docx

3 Pages
Unlock Document

Political Science
Nelson Wiseman

Nov 19 2012 POL214Y-Charter  Courts don’t get involved in the principle of responsible Gov. because it’s prerogative.  Religious and gender rights: ex- the women not able to get a guy cut by a Muslim barber at a parlor. It’s a rights issue. In order for it to be an issue, it needs to be the government violating it. It’s a personal matter, so the Go can’t get involved.  Another ex- eldrige was a deaf man who felt discriminated that the ppl in the hospital can’t communicate with him through sign. The gov did get involved. The hospital was an extended arm of the Gov. thus it is a Gov. issue. 1. The CRF & the stnstitutional order  The 1 way is that it was centralizing, Americanising and legalizing.  The charter now legalizes nationally. It contributes juditializing politics.  Testing cruise missiles was harming the safety of the individual.  Some political issues are being judicialized  What about well fair payments. Should they be determined by the …  The charter in the sense of legalizing Canada’s political life expands liberty by restricts democracy.  Legalizing Canada’s political order may be a draw back.  Judges r unelected and unaccountable.  The charter contributes to centralizing and legalising and Americanising the constitutional order and the charter  How Americanising?- peace order and good government. There is a hierarchical structure of responsible Gov.  Back then there was priority given to group interest instead of the individual. But the charter is full of liberal and individualist values and clams of individual and value rights. This framed the American constitution.  Crown immunity- is gone. Now we see life, liberty  The framework of the charter is conceptually American. In 405 of its ruling in the 80s we leaning toward American ruling. But now it has gone diff ways.  We have become more liberal b/c of the charter.  We have responsible and U.S has congressional Gov.  The charter points in the American direction. But not really- freedom of speech!  192- brooks- Canada’s rejection of hate propaganda vs. freedom of speech. America says diff- as long as there is not physical threat to groups.  So the charter challenges the supremacy of parliaments but it also accommodates it. 2. The CRF, Power and the political process  The charter transfers some rights to individuals and groups. This is a downward shift in power. There is also some authority shift from legislature to court. So this is a lateral shift in power, so the courts are gaining power. The 3 way the charter affect the power was changing the political view of people.  We all have access to the charter. Another way the charter affect the political process is that it made Gov more conscience about the type of law they make and drafting legislation. They have to charter proof it  The way the charter influences interest groups is to go to the courts. This is how gays got the right to marriage and women got the right to abortion. The 6 way th it influence the political power is that now b/c we have charter rights, when a group goes, the charter encourages non-territorial. What applies to one province, applies to all when it’s taken to court.  Thus, individuals and groups are implicit to the constitution.  There is also political significance in terms of political dualism. The charter undermines a compact view of what Canad
More Less

Related notes for POL214Y1

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.