Class Notes (835,921)
Canada (509,501)
POL305Y1 (56)
Lecture

2012-10-29_Lecture#7-Military Rule and Statism in the Andes.docx

6 Pages
107 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Political Science
Course
POL305Y1
Professor
Roberta Rice
Semester
Fall

Description
Ernie Tam 2012-10-29 Lecture#7-Military Rule and Statism in the Andes i) Soldiers, Oligarchs and the popular Sectors Andes Mountain divides the length of South America from top to bottom. They define the economy and organization of Andes. It has Bolivia (de facto capital of this country is the Andes). Moreover, it is the world’s largest capital city.  Coast/highlands/Amazon Lowlands  On the west size, there are coastal plains, there are valleys. The Amazonian lowlands as they reach toward Brazil.  Andes are known for their weak institutions, strong class/ethnic divide esp. In the central Andes. Low levels of economic growth are all factors. Political and economic indicators (2010) Country GNP/capita HDI Population % Urban % indigenous Peru 4710 0.723 29 million 72 38.5 Ecuador 4510 0.695 13.7 million 62 24.8 Bolivia 1790 0.643 10 million 64 50.5  Poverty and the exclusion of indigenous people. There are also dictatorships. There is so much inequality in these various countries.  Even though, they share the same structural indicators and circumstances, their history is very much different. Case Study: Peru: From Guano to Minerals  Dry Desert: Guano (Bird droppings) which is fertilized by the sun. Lots of nitrogen. o Great fertilizer for crops and is what fueled the economy of Peru  In the early 1860s80% of Peru’s economy was dependent on the source.  By the 1880s, the end of Guano period b/c the bird could not keep up with the demand.  IN 1890, there were mini booms in the diversity of their economy (export booms)  1890s-1930s: Rubber from rubber trees, sugar from coastal plantations, cotton on their coast, wool (sheep), copper in the mountains (with US investment), and then later, there was oil on the coast of Peru with US and Canadian investment. o The mini booms in each area had the country do well.  Great DepressionEconomy DID NOT TANK for them. Instead of ISI, Peru went through ELI instead. (in cooperation with foreign investment) Ernie Tam 2012-10-29 Bolivia: Silver, Tin and Gas  One family controlled the monopoly on Tin where in 1929, their production was about 47 000 metric tons of Tin.  Early 1900s 15 000 metric tons.  Long history of revolt. Mining was central part of economy; you have militant workers when they are mixed with urban people. The only country in Latin America to have revolution in 1952.  Great Depression destroyed the Tin industry and compared to other Tin industries in the world, Bolivia had the lowest quality. Moreover their transportation costs were much too high.  What did they do in 1932? o Attacked Paraguay. 1932-Chaco War (1932-1935)  Between Bolivia and Paraguay over control of the Northern part of the grand Chaco, which was incorrectly thought to be rich in oil?  Critics of the war, was stating how Bolivia’s president was trying to cause a distraction.  This war pitted the two poorest countries against one another. There was a highly difficult time to adapt to fight against the Paraguay army (thanks to the environment)  In 1935, Bolivia lost the section of Chaco to Paraguay but anyhow gained oil in the future.  The Chaco war saw the return of Paraguay Veterans fighting. They were good at what they did since they were always attacked.  Bolivia eventually lost and 65 000 people were killed. Ecuador: From Cacao to Bananas to Petroleum  Economic power comes from coast not highlands.  No guerilla fights, populism was big,  Ecuador did not want pollution from mining (recent events)  1880s: Cacao (to make chocolate) and the country was responsible for 15-20% of World’s output. o Non labor and non capital intensive industry  Thrived along the coast, instead of promotion infrastructure, the government opted for the river rather than building roads.  By 1915, other countries were growing cacao and so they lost out on the industry (brazil)  IN 1948, Bananas were produced with multinational companies. First period of sustained economic growth in the country.  Ecuador did not have an industry till this time….small and medium farmers and it created more demand for domestic market.  In the 1960s: the oil produced the third boom. Petroleum fields was transformed the country to the third largest country of oil behind Venezuela.  IN 1972, there was pipeline from Amazon to coast. IN 1971, the country earned 43 million from oil and by 1974; it was up to 350 million. Ernie Tam 2012-10-29 Peru: General Juan Velasco Alvarado (1969-1978)  Marxism, Student unions, Peasants were locked into to Allesande system. The left was trying to organize peasantry.  Military coup of 1968 paved the way for a type of revolution government called “revolution from above”  He declared the government as “anti-feudal, anti-oligarchicical, pro labor, and pro peasant” 1) New economic order that was neither capitalist or communist 2) A system that abolished inequalities and created the material base for harmony and providence.  Features of his regime: 1) Social and political autonomy- Acted alone and did not work with civilians 2) Leaders involved by Dependency TheoryDid not like SUBORDINATE POSITION> Believed in economist approach 3) Genuine sympathy with the plight of oppressed peasantsRevolutionary military regime.  All the officers all came in the low or middle class. They could see firsthand the peasants.  Came from lower class.  Policies 1) Agrarian Reformeliminated all LAND holdings regardless of productivity and subjected to size. Including the mechanized sugar plantation on the coast. They put workers into “co-operatives”. These groups of peasants have a COLLECTIVE TITLE. By mid 1980s, the most sweeping land reform since the Cuban Revolution in 1978. [Enrique Mayer in 2009 titled Ugly stories of the Peruvian Agrarian Reform] 2) Industrial Reform  ISI: Imports State led industrialization. 3) Reform of political participation: They set up the entire system of state corporatism…Tie peasants to new regime of state corporatism. State institution created called SINAMOS (National system of Support for Social Mobilization)  Dictatorship doing this for the purpose of creating the slogan “without masters”  Affiliate with the state  Top down systemState corporatism laid groundwork for industrialization and autonomous development.  Not interested in repressing worker class.  Peru much like medico was very corporate.  In the chapters read by Minoy (Search up weekly readings to confirm the author name), business class was threatened by entire regime.
More Less

Related notes for POL305Y1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit