Class Notes (836,136)
Canada (509,645)
POL305Y1 (56)
Lecture

POL305 Lecture4

4 Pages
95 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Political Science
Course
POL305Y1
Professor
Roberta Rice
Semester
Fall

Description
POL305 1-Oct-12 Lecture4 1) ISI 2) Corporatism 3) Populism 4) Research Proposals 1930s-1960s ISI = import Substitution Industrialization (esp Mexico and Argentina) 1930s, Core countries went into the Great Depression, creating a space in the global South to create their destiny. They could no longer buy their imports, so had to create them themselves - Import Substitution Industrialization: a strategy of industrial development based on manufacturing goods domestically that were previously imported. Local Manufacturers were protected by numerous mechanisms o Eg Tariffs, or taxes, on imports o Eg Tax incentives and direct subsidies to local industries o Eg Quotas, or limits on imports - Merits of ISI… o A form of economic independence/ self-sufficiency o Politically popular o Improvements in social and economic indicators  1950-1960, per capita income in LA doubled, translating to higher standards of living  1950-1960 Life expectancy increased: 52-64  1950-1960, 6% GDP growth  Established a manufacturing base - Limits to ISI… [Initially, profitable, BUT over time, developed some drawbacks] o Sectorial disparities  Non-competitive companies o Inefficient production  Lack of innovation o Disappointing industrial employment results o Small domestic markets with limited growth o Heavily dependent on loans over time.  Those counties that tried ISI for the longest time, experienced negative growth - Critobal Kag (2002) “Why East Asia overtook Latin America” o Timing!  After ISI, many Asian Tigers countries took on EOI (Export Oriented Industrialization), an industrialization strategy that is heavily tied to exporting manufacturing goods. 1960s  Had Latin America not had those trade restrictions and went into EOI, the story would be very different - Question = Why did LA stick with ISI for so long? (Compared with East Asian Tigers) Social + Political Changes - Emergence of a middle class - Rise of an urban working class o Unionization and mobilization  Increasing demand for political participation and social inclusion  “Social Question”= Elites of the society gather to debate over the appropriate role of the urban working classes within the economic and political system in early twentieth century Latin America. o Answer = Corporatism Corporatism - In general, this is a system in which interest groups become an institutionalized part of the political structure - State Corporatism = A system of interest group representation in which the state uses interest group structures to control and dominate citizen groups and the interests they are allowed to voice o State is the dominant actor o Interest groups are consulted only to gain their compliance  Appears to legitimize the state o A form of social control o Peak federations…  Business Group  Labor Group  Peasant Group  Eg Indigenous groups were clumped into this category o Eg National Confederation of Peasants (CNC) monopolized power between 1928-2000  Peasants had very little voice or power over this group whatsoever; elites used this puppet structure to control indigenous populations, making them feel like they are participating. Any rebels will be viewed as outside this structure - Clientelism (patron-client networks)= The dispensing of public resources by political power holders or seekers who off
More Less

Related notes for POL305Y1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit