Class Notes (838,371)
Canada (510,867)
Psychology (3,528)
PSY100H1 (1,637)
Lecture 4

PSYB30 Lecture 4.docx

5 Pages
Unlock Document

Connie Boudens

PSYB30 - Lecture 4 - February 6th, 2013 Personality Assessment Exam is Monday February 25th, 5-7 pm, 3 separate rooms, check Portal for details Personality Assessment: it's the process of evaluating personality or individual differences through 3 means 1) Tests 2) Interviews 3) Observations It involves use of systematic standardized procedures for observing, measuring, recording behaviours and personality features. What Makes a Good Personality Test? Reliability: the test you use is going to give the same results irrelevant of the number of times the test is done and the number of people it's done to 1) Time - Test-retest (ex. neuroticism; two tests should have strong correspondence) 2) Items - Chronbach's Alpha (>.70; .70 would be the minimum you would look for) - Across individual items on a test - Variance of a correlation 3) Raters - Interrater reliability - Subjective component (Observational research) (E.g. Asking raters to rate aggression on scale of 1-10. If your observational data are clear and raters are well trained, there should be strong correspondence in between the raters) Validity Four Types: 1) Construct Validity: Tests are closely aligned with your construct → Things you can't measure directly, must infer about it such as personality → (E.g. Self Confidence; tests must tap into what this construct means) 2) Face Validity: does it seem to be about that particular construct → (E.g. Measure of Depression - you should ask questions about the person's mood, sleeping patterns, etc.) → (E.g. Baxter Retching Faces (BARF nausea scale) used for kids that can't read, this has high face validity) 3) Criterion - how effective the test is of the criteria of something → (E.g. criteria of a college exam) → (E.g. position including conscientiousness and extroversion → jewellery person; anyone who scores high on this is a good jewellery person) *Of Special Concern in Test Development 1) Convergent Validity: Convergent validity refers to the degree to which scores on a test correlate with (or are related to) scores on other tests that are designed to assess the same construct. For example, if scores on a specific form a aggressiveness test are similar to people's scores on other aggressiveness tests, then convergent validity is high (there is a positively correlation between the scores from similar tests of aggressiveness). 2) Discriminant Validity: the degree to which scores on a test do not correlate with scores from other tests that are not designed to assess the same construct. For example, if discriminant validity is high, scores on a test designed to assess aggressiveness should not be positively correlated with scores from tests designed to assess intelligence Types of Personality Assessments 1) Dream Analysis - Freud - Psychodynamic Approach - Dreams represent unconscious desires - ("Royal Road" to Unconscious) - to reduce anxiety, ego disguises the true (latent) content of dreams using symbols (manifest content). Manifest content is analyzed to discover represented feelings 2) Interviews - F2F meeting to get information about personality, personal history a) Unstructured: informal conversation b) Structured: follows prearranged plan; series of planned questions *Biases in interviews; structured interviews minimizes such a bias Potential Biases a) Confirmation bias: making inference at the outset & asking questions to confirm it b) Halo effect: generalizes based on predominant features, may be unrelated to personality → (E.g. generalizing people who are attractive) c) Social Desirability: faking good (giving answers that they think are more socially acceptable); dissimulation, faking bad 3) Observations - Assessing behaviours through direct surveillance - selecting observers a) Professional personality assessors b) People who actually know the target → Often in better position to judge that persons' natural behaviour in a variety of contexts → May be biases because of relationship to target - Naturalistic versus Artificial → Naturalistic: observers record events that occur in natural course of lives of the participants → Artificial: occurs in artificial settings; an advantage of this is that you're able to control conditions and elicit relevant behaviours - Objective Personality Measures → involves standard set of questions or statements - "I am easily embarrassed" T/F - "I like to go to parties
More Less

Related notes for PSY100H1

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.