Class Notes (835,428)
Canada (509,186)
Psychology (3,518)
PSY100H1 (1,627)
Lecture

PSYC12_Lecture_2.docx

6 Pages
91 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSY100H1
Professor
Michael Inzlicht
Semester
Summer

Description
PSYC12: Psychology of Prejudice Lecture 2: Origins of Stereotypes Class overview  Prejudice today  Movie True Colours o Discussion  Origin of Stereotypes o Cognitive o Environmental o Socio-cultural & Motivational Discrimination when buying a new car  How would we study the existence of race/gender discrimination in car buying? o Send people into the field o Experimentally controlled study o Control their behaviour o Dress them all the same (neutral dress code) o Go to a few car dealership within the region o Ask about the same car model  Answer: 4 TWIN TESTERS o Age o Education o Attractiveness o Dress o Script o Same dealer o Same car  Multiple exemplars from each category of people ( black and white male & black and white females) and car dealerships Ayres & Siegelman, (1995) Initial Quote for a new car by Race and Gender 20400 20200 20000 19800 White 19600 Black 19400 Initial Price ($) 19000 18800 Male Female Social role  In this study we can see white males are offered less price on a car in comparison to the black males  As for females; white females are offered less pricing for a car than black females o White male: $19 225 o Black male: $ 20 200 o White female: $19 335 o Black female: $ 19 600 Discrimination when buying a new car  Why would salespeople: o Ask more money from women?  Stereotype that women are incapable of rational thinking  Women don't know much about cars  Women tend to be nicer and more agreeable o Ask more money from Blacks?  Association with race and education  More white males working as car dealers  Ask more money from black Movie Time! True Colours  Why does discrimination exist? Fear.  Why do stereotypes exist? Because of the behavior of the type of people and the environment. Origins of Stereotypes: Cognitive Categorization  Hassidic Jews: black hats, black suits, beards, ringlet “sideburns”, religious Categorization  Why categorize? 1. Infinite number of stimuli in environment 2. Limited capacity cognitive system  We can't process all the info in the social world, this is why we create groups 3. Essential part of learning  If we get rid of prejudice, we get rid of learning 4. Occurs spontaneously  Don't need to think about it actively  Our mind is set in a way that categorize things we perceive. If we don't categorize objects and not put label we will end up seeing new things. Therefore once u learn something u keeps it in ur head and categorize it in such a way to prevent yourself from being overwhelmed.  In this study we see the Jews figure. U learn what and who they r and when u see them another time u know who they r.  We don’t just perceive table we see objects and shapes and then we know what to do with them. The problem we over generalize when we categorize.  We get rid of stereotyping we get rid of learning. Because we associate things based on what we learn or see  This study is of group of people and discusses the play they seen together. After the study they were given questionnaire and were asked who said what. The people did a lot of mistakes and so therefore they associated what they think who said what in to different category. They have used categorizing and short- cut based on what they knew and answered the questionnaire Categorization & Stereotypes  Stereotypes are traits associated with category o Positive, negative, neutral traits  Can be useful in making predictions o Example if u need an answer on religion you will approach someone who is religious based on what u see them as o e.g. Jewish read the bible  Are based on a “kernel of truth” o e.g., Jewish people tend to read the bible  Are fast & efficient o Don't need to think actively  But, they are also over-generalizations; especially when applied to an individual o Not everyone does a specific thing e.g., Not all Jewish people study/read the bible Groups  Categorize world into in-groups & out-groups o In-group: Groups to which we belong  E.g., Torontonian, Indian, Canadian, etc. o Out-group: Groups to which we do not belong  E.g., American, male, Christian  This simplifies social world Us vs. Them  Some groups known to be permeable and can change from one group to another Groups (Consequences)  Categorizing accentuates inter-group differences o Problematic because of their extreme distance they create to one another. o -When u dehumanize a group is easier to treat them poorly.  Tend to think positively of in-group, IG bias o Our groups are an extension of us o We tend to think people belong to our group share uniqueness and the other groups are different and don't have any uniqueness to them o Even minimal groups—camp! Different colour groups; like your own colour group and not others (love in-group and not out-group)  Tend to think of out-groups as all the same, OG homogeneity Origin of Stereotypes: Environmental Both are innocent victims of Toronto gunplay! We still hear about Creba! The Media  Is the Media accurately portraying reality? o Jane Creba is well known to many but not Chantel Dunn. Both victims were in the parking lot caught by a gunfight. However Chantel didn't make the front-page news. The news that was received had to do with their race. Jane is white and Chantel is black. o The media is bias in what they say. The way we can answer this question is what makes the news and what does not. o It sk
More Less

Related notes for PSY100H1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit