Class Notes (835,047)
Canada (508,890)
Psychology (3,518)
PSY270H1 (202)
Lecture 6

Lecture 6

6 Pages
42 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSY270H1
Professor
Susanne Ferber
Semester
Fall

Description
Lecture 7: 309 – Cortical Streams of Processing: + ventral stream travels to the temporal lobe + dorsal stream goes to the parietal lobe – theories of object recognition: + view-dependent frame of reference: - template theory – recognize it - to recognize an object, we have to have representations of it in multiple different frames - view-dependent - depends on the viewpoint that we've seen it – angles - can call upon the template to recognize the object + view-invariant frame of reference: - geon theory - when looking at an object... look at the geons that make it up - see the geons and recognize the object at this angle, etc – Dependent vs. Invariant? + repetition suppression - see a object and brain activity occurs ... few seconds later, see it again and have less brain activity relative to the first time – idea of repetition suppression activity + task: show people objects with same orientation or different orientation... shows different parts of brain that shows sensitivity - see a new object, have a high brain activity... same view, less brain activity... but different view, there's high amount of brain activity again (treating it like a completely different object) in the right fusiform area (bottom part of temporal lobe) – dependent. More template-like - new object emits high brain activity, but same view and same object in a different view has lower brain activity – invariant. Left fusiform area, more geon-theory like. + each hemisphere processes information in slightly different ways – Representing complex objects at the neural level: + Gnostic hypothesis: “grandmother cells” + when looking at a person, one neuron corresponds and activates .. → recognize the person - idea that you have one cell when activated, corresponds to perception of grandmother. When see grandmother, activate all sorts of feature about her (ie: face shape/hair) and this constellation of brain activity, all of these features that corresponds to grandma... when activated together, they activate the grandmother self, the cells that corresponds to grandma. - thinking about grandma... - seeing different features of an object, activate agnostic cell, and when the single cell is activated, perceive the given stimulus + ensemble coding hypothesis: - instead of having a grandmother cell, you have lots of features that activate together - to recognize grandma, picking up same features an agnostic cell would but there isn't some cell that's “grandma” - perceiving all these features that make up grandma & this constellation of activity leads you to say it's grandma – Category-specific loss of knowledge? + herpes virus coming into the brain... demolishes the temporal lobes;; selective to both sides + show objects to people with the damage and ask to describe it → not specific, general. + damage to temporal lobes... - temporal lobes linked to concept knowledge... different categories of knowledge spread across different parts of the temporal lobe - knowledge of the people is stored in the front part of the lobe - knowledge of animals is stored a little bit further back - knowledge of tools is even further back. + see how it lines up to impairments... if you damage the front and the back, you're more likely to have damaged the middle as well. – Object recognition is an incredibly important process that relies on high-quality visual input and the ability to link this input to stored conceptual knowledge – How is knowledge stored? Evidence seems to be favoring ensemble coding but lesion studies might tempt us into thinking there is a “Ryan Reynolds” cell in our brain.. – The Corpus Callosum: + left and right hemispheres don't do exactly the same thing – modest specialization exists (ie: motor system) + right side of body controlled by left frontal lobe + attention more specialized in right hemisphere; language in left + separation difficult to probe + purpose: connects the two hemispheres together – whatever the right side of brain knows, left knows quite transfer = information transfer done at light speed + epilepsy... seizures that don't have current underlying cause - grand mal seizures... involves involuntary motor movements – body shakes. Person loses consequences, cease for a certain amount of time and wake up confused. Can have multiple seizures per day depending on severity. There's anti-epileptic medication that reduce excitability of brain, works well on some people. + can cut out part of a brain that's responsible for generating seizures... problem: many seizures come from medial temporal lobe (involves hippocampus – hotspot for seizures). - taking it out is really undesirable... fix one problem, create another. + callosotomy: cut the corpus callosum, the bridge between the two hemispheres. - reduce the spread of seizure... contain it to one side of the brain - people more likely to respond to medication, seizures reduced – Surgical resection of the corpus callosum + front, back or middle of it can be cut + have to cut part of the skull and brain to reach the corpus callosum – Functional subdivisions of corpus callosum: + divided by types of information it transfers + frontal part of the corpus callosum transfer motor information – corresponds to frontal lobes (have motor corticies) + somatosensory area that corresponds to the parietal lobe (Posterior midbody) + auditory for temporal lobe (Isthmus) + Splenium is for occipital lobe + Rostrum – higher cognitive? + Nowadays, just cut the front of corupus callosum. If you cut the anterior midbody, clinical results are just as the same as cutting the whole brain → cut little as possible and get maximum results + when cutting the corpus callosum, each side of the brain is going to try and do their own thing – difference in processing, specialization between the two hemispheres → “Split brain patients” + Tachistoscopic Presentation: split brain patient sits and stares at a screen. Information presented on the screen so quickly that you can't even move your eyes – whatever's on the right visual field is going to the left side of the brain …. Left side of brain knows something that the right doesn't know;; vice versa. Can isolate knowledge information to one hemisphere or both. - key and ring presented;; key on left, ring on right. Can recall the object seen on the right visual field that goes to the left hemisphere. Never says key – right hemisphere cannot talk. - when asked to grab the object he had seen with his right hand, grabs the ring – whatever he can say, he can grab it with his right hand. - when asked to grab the object he had seen with his left hand, grabs the key – right hemisphere controls knowledge by moving the left hand. When asked why he grabbed the key, he's not sure/tries to make up a story that explains his behavior. - when right hemisphere does something and left hemisphere doesn’t know why, left tries to make sense of it – reason. + when seeing a horse on LVF, draws a saddle instead with the left hand – semantically related. Right hemisphere controls the left hand to draw. – Looking at faces composed of fruits/vegetables: + right hemisphere better at holistic whole-processing of faces. – Degree of information transfer in the corpus callosum: + Normal brain: receive the stimulus on the left side to the right hemisphere. But the information crosses over to the left so you can say what it is. + Complete split: information contained in right he
More Less

Related notes for PSY270H1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit