Class Notes (839,626)
Canada (511,431)
Psychology (3,528)
PSY328H1 (73)

Lecture 1.docx

2 Pages

Course Code
William Huggon

This preview shows 80% of the first page. Sign up to view the full 2 pages of the document.
Psy Law We wanna look at the interaction of empirical and theoretical things. Slide: Differences between Law and Psychology Law vs Psychology 1. Stare decisis vs Creativity Stare decisis: legal term – whatever happened before, has to happen again/will be used to determine what happens in the future. Ex: man slaughter defendant got 2 yrs in prison, a future man slaughter defendant will also/should get 2 yrs in prison. Basically, the only time that the second defendant will also get 2 yrs in prison, will be if the crime is the exact same. Creativity: psychology is supposed to be about doing something new. That being said, youre prob not gonn be doing something brand new bc (talking about proposal), we can never do something that is 100% brand new bc we will be basing off previous research. 2. Hierarchical vs Empirical Hierarchical: federal level law  all provinces are bound by that. So it goes top to bottom. Therefore we can appeal to higher courts: if the higher court goes with it then the lower one has to go with it Empirical: if the data/empirical results doesn’t go with it then we have to change our hypothesis 3. Adversarial vs Experimental Aversarial: one lawyer vs the other – whoever debates the best wins. It is kind of a subjective truth. Experimental: psychology contrasts this. Experimental and empirical results are objective  we want to really get to the full on truth. 4. Prescriptive vs Descriptive Prescriptive: law tells you what to do Descriptive: “why are people acting that way? Lets describe it” or like predicting people’s behavior because of previous data. 5. Idiographic vs Nomothetic Idiographic: based on an individual or specifics. Nomothetic: we base everything on general principles  “in general people act like this…” 6. Certainty vs Probablistic Certainty: law is certain. “Is the person guilty or not” all or nothing Probablistic: example in a survey if someone gets 60% guilty, then it’s over 50% therefore they must be guilty. We have extra info that we can correlate 7. Reactive vs Proactive Reactive: law is reactive ex: we create laws as we go along in reaction to something internet piracy) Proactive: psychology is proactive: whatever you are interested in you can do research on. 8. Operational vs Academic Operational: applies to real world problems. Academic: psychology is supposed to be for academic reasons Psychology of the law Example: Prejudice in court trials 40 yrs ago vs today Psychology and the law Example: victims of rape are very emotional and crying, which 6 months to a year later, is not very realistic
More Less
Unlock Document

Only 80% of the first page are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.