Class Notes (837,001)
Canada (509,985)
Psychology (3,518)
PSY424H1 (38)
Lecture

Lecture 2

9 Pages
72 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSY424H1
Professor
Stephanie Spielmann
Semester
Fall

Description
Lecture 1 Sept. 13 2012th ← -Prof: John Vervaeke • [email protected] (put course name in subject line) • SS4093; office hours are Monday 2-5 • 416-978-7306 ← ← -No textbook -> download articles week by week ← ← th - Oct. 18 MIDTERM (45%) & TOPIC PROPOSAL (5%) • Two sections: o 1) short answer/essay - will be asked to define/explain it it also then to which issues/debates it is relevant too then explain HOW and WHY it is relevant….if do all this will get an “A”. To get an “A+” have to take a risk and make an original analysis/criticism/connection of the issue (do it WELL, if not -> will drop below an “A”) ; Choice (answer x# out of 10 questions o 2) Long argumentative essay  have to have a good thesis  intelligently and critically understand the issue at hand  May refer to short answer in essay BUT can’t refer to long essay answer  2 & a half times longer than short answer o Tests are CHALLENGING but fair…  No questions SPECIFICALLY on the readings  Just get overall argument, how the evidence was generate and how the argument fits in the bigger pictures  Concentrate on getting argument RIGHT • Topic Proposal has to be handed in o Have to right an essay but YOU choose the topic; NOT proposing an experiment…proposing a topic for a theoretical paper…being evaluated on ability to generate a topic o Write THREE paragraphs (4-5 sentences each)  1) describe/explain topic  do NOT have to have a thesis yet  2) Explain how and why how topic is relevant in this course…how it might be important to this course/research  3) How can you cover the topic well in a 3000 word essay  how is your topic not too broad or too narrow?  How does it fit into the bigger picture -> if can answer this then its not too narrow or too broad  Kind of like a structural outline  Have an APA list of at LEAST 10 independent sources (not from required reading list of course)  This is your preliminary bibliography  May not have articles ON your topic but may be relevant to your topic  Must give priority to books and articles from 1995 • Book has to be published by someone who is an accredited expert on the subject (have to search them up)  Peer reviewed journals, accredited academic sources o Have to keep topic proposal and attach it to the final essay ← ← -ESSAY • 3000 words (about 10 pgs) (100 words more or less is okay; if want to go over 3100 words need explicit permission from prof) • Have to do an abstract, title page and bibliography but NOT running head or section heads o Have a GOOD title (title, date, course code, your name and prof’s name) • Staple ONCE in the corner; then again staple topic • Theoretical, argumentative research essay; arguing a thesis -> prove your point, trying to convince o Criticize article’s evidence and theories -> integrate into your argument to establish the thesis ; consider counterpoints to your arguments and defend against them o Thesis is a claim that you want readers to believe…has to be challenging (requiring proof etc)..has to be CLEAR and CHALLENGING o GET TO THE POINT -> brevity o CAN NOT BE A REPORT!!!! ← • Due Nov. 22 2012 = MIDTERM • Final exam -> cumulative but more emphasis on stuff after the midterm ← ← Lecture 1 ← ← -common sense & intuition have lead to… • 2 metaphors that guide the scientific investigation of thinking o 1) to see thinking like action but a special kind of action…  -Thinking seems a lot like an action, we can talk about choice, motivation , goals…it makes sense to talk about failure or error the same way we do about actions…  Thinking involves processing information in a certain way…it’s a kind of search & what we are doing while we are thinking is engaging in a search (we are using directed movement (involves, choice, motivation, goals etc) through information that is connect  “Search Inference framework”  when thinking you find something and make inference based on what you find  This is tied up with the “computational model of the mind” • Cognition as a form of computation  Thinking is like action, so if we study physical behavior we will understand thinking  Tends to emphasize inference -> what you are doing when you are thinking is making an argument/making inferences. Thinking is very much like what computers do o 2) Thinking is a lot like perception  we come to realize/become aware of things were weren’t aware of before because of our thinking  a lot of our perception occurs automatically/unconsciously (kind of like sensing)  We play on the words “see” and “sense” when we are talking about cognition but we aren’t using them in the literal sense of the word  GESTALT TRADITION  Thinking s like perception and if we study perception we will get good analogies to understand thinking]  Doesn’t work with the computational framework of the mind  Prioritizes insight…thinking has a lot to do with attention -> thus the computer is a BAD model • Both are intuitive and show up in our everyday thinking…but they are DIFFERENT (active vs passive (gestalt) in some ways they. Predominant anglo-american approach is the search inference vs in Europe they use Gestalt more. This frameworks have been in a long standing debate with each other. It is very difficult to achieve a compromise between the two….but we are kind of getting to a point where there might be a third position that transcends both…. ← ← -Search Inference • Is most strongly associated with Newell and Simon. • Idea here is to understand thinking on the model of problem solving…thinking =
More Less

Related notes for PSY424H1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit