Class Notes (835,678)
Canada (509,327)
Psychology (3,518)
PSY435H1 (48)
Lecture 3

Lecture 3.docx

5 Pages
98 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSY435H1
Professor
Betsy Bennett Purvis
Semester
Winter

Description
PSY435- Lecture 3 (Jan. 30 , 2014) TED talk- Nicolas Kristof -our changes ripples out at least 3 lengths (if there are nodes of change all over the place, you can hit a majority) -graphite and diamond metaphor -changes can happen extremely rapidly  possibility for NON-LINEAR rates of change -reason why? Has to do with INTER-dependence (two things effect each other and have influence on each other) -A  B (and feedback loop)  rates of change can change -if positive feedback loops happen in society you can see change dramatically changing- you never know Climate Change: -the science of climate change has changed a lot (over the past 10 and 5 years) -the basic knowledge now is a lot less of a hypothesis than a long time ago (the consensus has changed a lot over the years) -global warming- energy in and energy out and the balance gives just the climate we have -greenhouse gases have been going up dramatically since the industrial revolution -Mauna Loa observatory in Hawaii (they are tracking CO2 concentrations)  led to the first data set -seasonal variations in CO2 concentrations over the year (the inhalation and exhalation of the biosphere) -noticed that year after year the concentration is increasing (graphed out) -whose to know that it’s not all just part of the natural revolution, maybe there are other things as factors, sample size is too small, etc., etc. -now they have mapped this out in about a million years looking at fluctuations in CO2 emissions (sinusoidal) – changes in solar radiation, tilts, ice age, etc., etc. (Malechevich cycles etc.) -you end up with a range from the highest crest to lowest trough -between 290- 180 ppm (over a million years!) -since the industrial revolution CO2 concentrations were at 400ppm (the peak!) -superimpose a temperature graph that will look almost exactly the same (thus correlated with CO2) -the CO2 graph lags behind the temperature graph by 100 years (temp. changes happen FIRST) -interdependence means that both things cause each other -big problem if it is A  B -there are macro changes in the Earth that drive small fluctuations in temperature -if CO2 was stabilized those changes can be minimal -but big changes causes changes in temp, then amplifies other factors to change CO2 and perpetuate other processes -the notion that there is dissent in the scientific community is a lie because these are fundamental research basics (there isn’t any community that states that these correlations flat out do not exist) -earlier metaphor of global warming (a bad marketing term)  climate destabilization -the term now is climate change -climate forcings- energy in and out measure and energy effects of major global events (climate forces) -changes in the ‘energy budget’ -the bigger the temperature gradient, the more wobbly the “top”, the polar air starts to force its way down http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-01-07/why-is-it-so-cold-the-polar-vortex-explained.html -the poles are heating up way faster than anywhere else -what about ice libido? -with feedback loops you can get nonlinear states -feedback loops: 1) Ice reflects sun’s energy  water -the shrinkage of the ice has been about 1% a year -rate of change is also changing -arctic is a big heater (ice turns into water) 2) Methane -a GHG and captures more potent than CO2 (depends on the time scale) -methane degrades fairly quickly -CO2 even if it captures less energy it is in the atmosphere for many years -increasing methane in the air (captures way more heat) = hotter temperature = less ice, etc., etc. -what releases methane? Stuff rotting -The north is PERMAFROST- once it melts, it rots -methane is going up -methane plumbs (huge) and unknown amount of them -Arctic Methane Emergency group Realclimate.org, desmogblog, global climate coalition, Paul Beckwith IPCC- world’s collective voice of climate change (not really) -a global collaboration amongst the world’s scientists trying to work together and a report comes out as best consensus of the data -confidence of their hypothesis is increasing (not much change in hypothesis) -climate knowledge is also accelerating so these reports are dated -the projections from IPCC are more conservative and less urgent  because it is a compilation -it is also politically influenced by OIL COMPANIES and governments -many forces clawing back what they are trying to say -average warming of the globe in the world will be between 1 to 6 degrees -1.6-1.8 degrees are already locked in -oceans are also warming and hide the effects of warming in the atmosphere by a couple of years -sea level rises is really not that important- although its freaky and it’s not a small thing -but it’s not as important as FOOD (indispensible)- big problem for EVERYBODY -freaky TED talk- Jeremy Jackson (Marine biologist)- How we wrecked the oceans -we have overfished- most of the species are at or over biological collapse (the ocean is on the surgery table)  al gore’s fishing video (watching areas get depleted and industries move and move) -jelly fish don’t need many nutrients  there is a population boom in jellyfish -phytoplankton are also diminishing in the oceans (about 1% a year)- lost about 50% of the bottom of the food chain -acidification of the ocean- has to do with the CO2 in the atmosphere t
More Less

Related notes for PSY435H1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit