Class Notes (839,079)
Canada (511,183)
Religion (798)
RLG100Y1 (486)
Lecture 6

Lecture 6 and 8.doc

4 Pages
46 Views

Department
Religion
Course Code
RLG100Y1
Professor
S.Krishnamurti

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 4 pages of the document.
Description
Lecture 6 Topics: • Indian philosophy and inter-religions debate • Mimamsa, Vedanta, nyaya • Proof for the existence of God Indian philosophy and inter-religious debate Common ground for debates • Debates focused on epistemology as well as metaphysics and soteriology (Terms in philosophy) Epistemology: how does one know Metaphysics: your core principles Soteriology: ultimate end/heaven • Shared understanding of rationality • Dialectical form of argumentation involving the views of the opponent and one’s own views Dialectical form: texts build on debates, not a sole personal opinion Means of valid knowledge • Perception • Inference – critical for the proof of existence of god Eg:  All men are mortal. Samir is a man, therefore samir is mortal.  I see smoke on hill, whenever there is smoke there is fire, example of the kitchen, therefore the hill has fire. • Presumption: (negative inference) • Verbal testimony This world begins with rationality and reasoning. One person should be able to convince the other. Philosophy and liberation? Moksa: liberation, re-birth. *vedic people: don’t believe in moksa Mimamsa, Vedanta, Nyaya Sanskrit, pre-Islamic texts. Mimamsa: (Atheist) – focused on vedic traditions specifically sacrifice • Vedic apologetics (when vedic sacrifice wasn’t important, they defended it and the importance of it, they wanted to hold on to it. They had a rational position) • Knowledge of correct action in accord with dharma • Rational reflection on sacrifice (don’t believe in gods) • No belief in god *perform sacrifice to have a son or go to heaven but there is no god Vedanta (“end of Veda”) *Upanishads* • Theism • Focused on metaphysics • Relationship between universal spirit (Brahman) and individual soul (atman) • Interpretation of bhagavad gita, upanisads, brahma sutras. *Buddhists = don’t believe in gods Nyaya • School of logic, rational argumentation • Buddhism and external objects • Realism (developed proof for existence of god, interested in inference) • Argued with Buddhists *talk about the logic/inference with Buddhists, everything turns out to be against the buddhists. They proved that there is god on based on inference. Nyaya and Saivism? • Buddhists believe in “momentaries” = from moment to moment, everything changes, things don’t remain the same. Nyaya proof for the existence of God 1. Cosmo
More Less
Unlock Document

Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit