Class Notes (837,553)
Canada (510,314)
Rotman Commerce (1,103)
RSM225H1 (70)
Dan Shear (32)

chapter 8

2 Pages
Unlock Document

Rotman Commerce
Dan Shear

Chapter eight: grounds upon which a contract may be set aside: mistake and misrepresentation The narrow meaning of mistake  Legal mistakes is not seen as misstate in its General meaning  Only certain kinds of mistakes will make the contract void (the contract never comes into existence and no rights pass) or voidable (the contract exists until set aside by a court; rates may pass to third parties before it is set aside) and thereby qualify for equitable relief (a discretionary remedy first developed by the courts of equity to undo an injustice)  If mistaken party cannot restore the subject matter of the contract to that other contract party , the mistaken party and Moses the right to rescind (set aside; and do our people a contract and returned the parties as merely as possible to their original positions)  Unilateral mistake is when only one party is mistaken.  Mistakes are also grouped into substantive categories: mistakes about the terms of the contract, may stakes about the subject matter, mistakes about the identity of the parties Void and voidable contracts -if the court finds that there has been a mistake—in the legal sense of the word—the contract may be declared either avoid or voidable or any special circumstance, the mistake me being recorded (rectified) -under a void contract, no rights, title, or ownership passed to anyone -voidable contracts exist until they are set aside (rescind; undo or revoke a contract and return the parties as nearly as possible to other or regional position) by the court. - Prior that time, writes, title, and interests to pass as set out in the contract. - if the difference between a void and voidable contracts does not matter if the goods are still in the possession of the original parties when the contract is set aside. But if the goods have been conveyed to a third party prior to the contract of being set aside, of then the consequences of void and voidable contracts are quite different. The court of equity thought that taking the goods and read from a subsequent purchaser was too harsh in some circumstances and so created categories of mistaken that only render a contract voidable, allowing a subsequent innocent purchaser to keep the goods, even when the first contract is rescinded. -it is important to note that, in order to receive protection, and third party purchaser must be innocent and have paid value for the goods. -- a summary, where a contract concerns only the two origin all parties, whether the court declares it void or merely voidable might not matter, because in either event, the court may order the return of property that has passed between the parties. But if the property has been transferred to an innocent purchaser, the original owner may recove
More Less

Related notes for RSM225H1

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.