Feb 13 ENV222 lecture notes.pdf

3 Pages
107 Views
Unlock Document

Department
School of Environment
Course
ENV100H1
Professor
Stephen Scharper
Semester
Fall

Description
12) Feb. 13 Current actions: Civil society – the individual Nickerson, Raymond S. (2003). "Chapter 4:AttitudeAssessment and Change." Psychology and Environmental Change. Mahwah: N.J.: Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates. pp. 72-90. ! Lecture outline ! 1) attitudes toward environment Nickerson summary of psychology studies: . individuals do not feel threatened by environmental damage . nor do they not feel personally responsible . attitudes influenced by political stance; more left, more pro-environment . attitudes influenced by identification with cause of damage, eg work in the factory emitting pollution . some correlation with demographic factors, but not strong ! However, respecting demographic factors, we do know origins of environmentalism were in cities in 19 c. not rural areas; and that higher levels of education correlate with higher levels of concern for environment. ! Gifford, Robert (2002). “Chapter 3. EnvironmentalAttitudes,Appraisals andAssessments.” Environmental Psychology: Principles and Practice. Canada: Optimal Books, offers this view: . gender – women usually more concerned . childhood experience – outdoor experience correlates with concern . class – environmental concern to some extend higher in middle and upper classes . nationality – no major differences among countries, but those in global south tend to be concerned about local issues (eg threats to drinking water) while those in global north concerned about global issues (eg climate change) . urban v rural – differences not clear (but see above) . exposure to environmental risk – those living closer to environmental problems, eg hazardous waste site, are more concerned ! 2) perceived value of environment Contingent valuation surveys are used for some policy purposes to determine public support for different options; eg, anAustralian survey found citizens would pay $143 a year to prevent impacts from mining in a national park.As the reading shows, the methodology is difficult. ! This also raises the issue of putting a dollar value on what many people feel should not be subject to market exchange. The same problem exists with the concept of valuing ecosystem services. Constanza, R. et al (2007). “The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital.” Nature, 387: 253-260, estimated that replacing services to humans provided by the nonhuman world (eg erosion control, pollination of flowers, water supply) with human technology would cost $33 trillion per year (US, 1997 dollars). ! !1 Will an estimate like that influence human attitudes toward environment? ie, will humans value it more because a dollar value has been put on it? ! 3)Assessing environmental quality Nickerson reading: . people prefer natural scenes, with greenery and water, over human-made . leads to suggestion humans have an inherent, genetic attraction to the nonhuman ! My comment - but humans have also always seen nature as a threat (starving to death in the wilderness) whic
More Less

Related notes for ENV100H1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit