Class Notes (838,337)
Canada (510,861)
Sociology (3,262)
SOC101Y1 (985)

Simmel- Metropolis and mental life

6 Pages
Unlock Document

Irving Zeitlin

Lecture 10 Simmel on Metropolis Mental Life “ Man is a differential creature.” * In city, there is more nerve stimulating. We notice difference, instead of similarities. Sharp discontinuity, and lot of changing caught people’s attention. * Psychological condition. * The city have sharp difference than rural and countryside. * Man is a discriminating creature, (we pick on difference). * People are paying attention to differences; and, the sense will be more bombarded 质问 in the city. - Contrasting life in city and country side: in city our nerves are more stimulating, we notice there is a difference, but not similarity. We don’t pay attention to things that are conformed. We are more alert to differences. Given the way we are put together, our senses are more bombarded in cities than in countryside. Georg Simmel “The Metropolis and Mental Life” (1903) 1. Source of identity in “The Web of Group Affiliations” (Networks) * Social structure and traditional society. Connectedness of people. * Simmel looks at traditional society (village) and modern society (City) * In the traditional society: dense relationships: everybody in the community knows each other. Consistency of identity. ---> The idea is people that we know, they are collecting information about us, they are consistently monitor and surveillance us, watching everything and every word we do. * But in today’s society: loss linkage between people: our family with family next door. Modern society. Galaxy in the distance, instead of knowing everyone. * In modern city, pressure to consistency is weaker because we are exposed to different kinds of people and groups. * Consequences of the shift from Traditional to Modern society. i.e. the monitoring function is weakened. * I.e. humor, some jokes can tell in a social circle, but you cannot tell in other social circle, probably shame, or dare. * Connecting difference social roles. * Given we are not the same in each social circle, who are we as an individual? Simmel is asking the question of integrity (complete, unified), if our personality is disintegrating in terms of consistency of personality, and also asking moral integrity as well. * Challenge of retaining certain integrity. * The question: WHO AM I? in different situation, lack of consistency, we are always changing. * Integrity? Personality inconsistency. * Connection between social integration (fulfilling different social roles) and lack of integration. * Modern Life: more diversity. But also challenges. * Connection between social network and identity. 1. Sources of identity in “The Metropolis and Mental Life” (networks and tempo of stimuli) (reading for tonight) * Concerned about identity in modern society again * Simmel is talking about interaction between people. Frequent. Nature of interaction. Social distance. * Simmel talking about interaction and nature of interactions. * City dwellers are less emotional than country side people, especially on market transaction in the city. * Talked about hardness of people in economic exchanges, the indifference to others because who you are and who your clients are shouldn’t matter in market exchange. 1. An added twist: Human are differentiating creatures. * Not only sounds, feeling, but also the exposure of different people. 1. The identity of the big-city dweller: -- Intellectual * market transaction in the cities. Trade things with people. * Exchange of things and its quality. * Calculations of people. Hardness. * Indifference to others. Who you are is not matter in terms of the price of your thing. * Hardness, how close to the people you charge from. * Most Simmel’s discuss is about... -- Blase * Being bombarded in the city, more stimulated. * Simmel says, in the city, lack of rest, new sensations, a lot of new is happening. * Loss of the differences. * We are so over-stimulated eventually we are tired, and we don’t respond anymore. * Too much happening, resulting in capacity to react to new stimuli. * We are overloaded so we fail to discriminate, meaning we fail to tell things apart. -- Reserve * City people are More cool, more distance. * Difference of city and small town. In small town, be sure that people are not alone. But in city like Toronto, too many people, too many contact. People are all different. * Over-stimulated, too many contacts too many people. * We close up, and self-protected when there are more people and getting crowded. * We are trained as reserve and self-protection. * Simmel says another reason is self-protection because we are doing this to each other too. If we are being treated with reserved, makes no sense for use to not be. * The city is a place, people are cool to each other. reserve. We are treat people back, people to us is cool, we cannot be war. -- Preciousness * The cultivation of refined differences. * We feel inherently entitled to personal space in city. * In one hand, reserve. on the other hand, we feel that we need to be treat as individuals. * We still wish to draw attention to our own circles. * We cultivate superficial peculiarity of taste -- goal is to stand out in the city. * Manner and dress, and taste. --> the goal is to stand out in the city. * individuality --> city life treat them as interchangeable to each one of other. * Individual preserve preciousness in order to protect their core identity that sets them apart to others according to Simmel. - Simmel’s bitter sweet way of talking. - He did not that which is better, from before and now. - He did not make his political value obvious. Different from Marx and others. I.e. Marx’s alienation. - Durkheim’s value, the value of solidarity. - Simmel’s value is hard to judge. He gave a fair evaluation of tradition and modern. 1. Simmel; vs. Tocqueville: a disagreement? (Modernity and Freedom) To Tocqueville: the modernity is more democracy, it is more conformity. Modern society is less good for produce the individuality. - Simmel does not have that explicit of a stand point as other thinkers like Marx. - Tocqueville believe the regime before French Revolution is better at producing personalitie
More Less

Related notes for SOC101Y1

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.