Class Notes (836,153)
Canada (509,662)
Sociology (3,253)
SOC102H1 (261)
Lecture

Soc102 Lec 1

10 Pages
87 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Sociology
Course
SOC102H1
Professor
Lorne Tepperman
Semester
Fall

Description
Sociology Lecture 1 Main Topic: Unequal Chances in Life -Term: "life chances" first coined by Max Weber -effective phrase; describes chancy nature of life -chances out of our control -ex: Game of Life by Milton Bradley -player tries to avoid obstacles in the game to become successful -in ways, it is similar to life -however it is very different because in real life, everyone has a diff starting point. -furthermore, many life choices are not made consciously or freely -socially unrealistic The Role of Social Origins -life chances depend on our social and economic background -society's structure favours people who are born with power (parent's class and status) -this starting point determined by parents we are born to -Economic Capital -Cultural Capital -Social Capital Rags to Riches -People likely to stay in social-economic class/status throughout their lives -Some in industrial societies overcome odds (rare) -rising from rags to richces -gain power and wealth -called social mobilization -social inertia: what resists one's mobility (i.e. the conditions we are born to) Natural Inequalities -Social inequalities: amount of life's rewards received -Natural Inequalities: Inequalities as a result of nature by birth (i.e. genes) -Sociologists interested in how natural diff becomes social inequalities -interested in social consequences as a result of this -ex: advantages of being born smart is a natural diff -> social inequality The Performance of Inequalities -Sociologists are interested in: a) how people dramatize or perform inequalities b) How people view inequalities c) How people explain inequalities d) How people justify inequalities e) How people invent or construct inequalities -Not interested in the natural differences ex: performance of physical beauty -ingrained in our minds what is considered beautiful by the media -The question becomes, what is the consequence of those deemed ugly? -what are the rewards of beauty? Not Just a Matter of Chance -Inequality has additive and multiplicative effects -ex: people with two or more disadvantages suffer more than twice people with one -Intersectionality: process of multiplicative interaction between disadvantages -end results are unpredictable -effects of each disadvantage cannot be summed to find overall effect Our Life Chances are Conditional -phenomenon called: Conditionality -pertains to conditions where particular traits lead to significant social disadvantage -ex: being a woman is not always disadvantageous -under certain conditions, being of lower class is worse Intersectionality -Theory: various social and biological factors interact on multiple levels to produce systematic social inequality -Kimberle Crenshaw's theory -categories include: gender, race, class, ability and sexual orientation -came to prominence b/c feminists claimed gender does not decide one's life -it is a combination of class, gender, race etc Status Incosistency -Status Consistency: coined by Gerhard Lenski -cannot predict effects of intersectionality by adding or averaging dimensions of social status. ex: status inconsistent people: High education, low income=> often act rebellious due to being uncomfortable about their status LivesAre Complex, Not Unique -cannot predict one's life chances by averaging advantages or disadvantages -This does not mean everyone's lives are unique -simply the issue is just complex -sociologists can still draw general conclusions about inequality -in essence everyone can only face a finite number of pressures in reality -the patterns we see are finite because the range of experiences for people are finite Societies Vary in Equality -Wide inequality is NOT an inherent or inevitable result to differentiate people -Scandinavian countries, Iceland, NZ are examples (upper end of Human Development Index) -different people are equal -do not frame differences as better or worse -ex: This was perhaps Robert Owen's aim when he was developing his Utopian Society -make one that is equal and prosperous despite surroundings of inequality Many Counties Do Worse than Canada -many with habits of inequality more marked or ingrained -Canadians identify inequality as a problem -care about the society they live in Views about Inequality -It exists everywhere at all times -no evidence a society can exist without it -range of inequalities that can take place -People however have strong and negative views about it -W.I Thomas and D.S. Thomas: men define situations as real, then consequences become real. -Their beliefs become reality and influences our views and behaviour ex: social inequality is evil then the consequences of it being evil (riots etc) come true -much of human history is driven by this process -what is seen as fair/unfair, justice/injustice, and our views about race, gender etc help shape the society we currently live in. People's Beliefs are important -sociologists study objective social problems, people's beliefs (and subsequent consequences) -need to consider their thoughts, beliefs and objective situations when studying The Social Construction of Problems -involves claims-making (subjective response base on their beliefs) -are subjective responses -a process people use to get public attention on their opinion on certain problems -also to promote their ideas of solutions -these claims usually exist long enough that they are brought to our attention -do not just pop up randomly -process usually (but not always) involves: -searching for villains to blame -creation of moral panic -pursuing a crusade for better behaviour -demanding improved laws -initiate full social movement that will put issue on political agenda Objective+ Subjective Factors -include changes to actual (measurable) reality -as well as changes in our perception of reality -Define social inequality as a social problem characterized by: -Visible, measurable features that threaten people's well-being -Strong beliefs in inequality -a social problem that warrants collective, remedial action Defining "unfair" Inequalities -Jean-Jacques Rousseau was first to theorize about social inequality -social inequality involves privilege -privilege: a right, advantage, favour or immunity specially granted. -for certain individuals, group or class -others outside are not allowed to have this Natural and Social Inequalities -According to Rousseau: any privilege or inequality that does not clearly arise out of a natural difference is contrary to laws of nature -social inequality is unjust if it exceeds natural inequality -asks us to imagine a natural law against which we can judge human laws -impossible for us to define these natural laws -closest to this is in psychology: study the survival value of certain behaviours -hard to do in sociology: cultural variations in social arrangement are huge -identifies why people care about social inequality ex: should Beethoven be allowed to conduct while deaf? -George Bush was a president primarily because his dad was one Inequality= Unjustifiable Privilege -privileges, rewards and opportunities people receive within society -fairness = equality and unfairness = inequality by people -ex: someone who is 2x as good should receive 2x the reward, not 100x (unjust) -we expect an "equal" process to be fair -equality before the law -equality in job opportunities -equality of economic outcome -when people get rewarded unfairly, we experience strong emotional response -whether this reaction is universal or Canadian is unknown -Rousseau: we know when unjust privileges have gone too far and reject it -this is not just modern Canadian response -view has been supported and demonstrated in history (French Revolution) Modern Definition of Social Inequality -unequal (and usually unjustifiable) privileges, rewards or opportunities that different people receive in a given society. -equal = fair, unequal = unfair -inequality seems to be a constant feature of human condition -people in large societies can't seem to escape it. -there are many different factors explaining inequality -they are all linked and dependent of one another Social Inequality still makes a Difference -According to economic liberals, social inequality is unavoidable -communities believe this not to be the case -research via brain imaging shows humans incline to believe in merit of equality -indicates this may be a natural occurrence -reward centers react well when a reward is justifable -we have a tendency to favour equality -inequality still makes a difference today as it did back in Rousseau's time -has important consequences: -sickness and health -crime and justice -war and peace -The real difference is that we know we change society and the inequalities seem even more important. -in the past, such change was questionable and considered the work of "god" Problems of Inherited Disadvantage -social disadvantages usually inherited -have little hope of escaping these inherited status -global spread of capitalism disperses and preserves social inequality to a previously unknown degree -this despite encouraging economic growth People Differ in Views of How to Split Benefits -ex: Ms. Jones grade school class -how to divide up her time to help them learn to read? -what is considered fair? -Christopher Jencks suggests 5 approaches: 1) Democratic Equality: give every student 5 min of help 2) Moralistic Justice: give more time to students who put in more effort 3) Weak Humane Justice: help the les advantaged backgrounds 4) Strong Humane Justice: give more help to students who have disabilities -i.e. short changed by life 5) Utilitarianism: give more time to the best readers and less to the worst -reasoning base on fact best readers will benefit most from more time There is no Single RightAnswer -Tragic choices are needed -Ms. Jones know the desire and skills to learn vary from children -their social and economic backgrounds differ greatly -People debates these problems in public all the time -Difficult to implement fairness The Rawls Principle -unequal distribution of goods is only justifiable when it increases the advantage of the least advantaged groups in society
More Less

Related notes for SOC102H1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit