Class Notes (838,325)
Canada (510,861)
Sociology (3,262)
SOC203H1 (77)
Lecture

feb. 25 2.doc

9 Pages
70 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Sociology
Course
SOC203H1
Professor
jackveulgers
Semester
Winter

Description
SOC203 Lecture Feb 25, 2013 Many students fail to make an argument Ask TA if your agument is good- summary is not enough Making a claim but not backing it up with evidence If you’re comparing thinkers, what is needed is to evaluate them- who was stronger on what points? Who was weaker on what points? Not just parallel summaries Weighing of the thinkers The assessment you will provide will consist of your main argument New Theme: Authority Authority can be of different kinds. We could talk about religious authority (Catholic Church electing a new Pope) The moral authority of the Church is very weak- so many cases of child abuse that have come forward. The problem has to do not only with the mistreatment of children, but also the way in which the institution responds to these cases. Attempts to cover up to silence this problem. Perfect illustration of erosion of moral authority – Church is supposed to uphold behaviour- there is a gap between what the Church is supposed to uphold and the behaviour. The kind of authority we will be looking at are: authoritative opinion, and political authority. Already have exposure of the erosion of political authority (French Revolution). - The King of France’s authority being weakened; and of the nobility around them – example of erosion of political authority. - A regime in which the rightness of rule has been called into question. Authority of Public Opinion – Should public opinion rule, can public opinion be trusted? - There have been times in which the people have been swayed by emotion, superstition, etc - When we consider those examples in history we should consider pause - Think about how many poor leaders have been elected democratically- shouldn’t that give way to praising public opinion? - Is public opinion divorced from reason and relate to emotion, or is it in fact to be trusted? - The erosion of religious authority is still with us (?) Exploring in more detail these two prongs of authority Starting with political authority Looking at the question of authority in Iraq after the second Gulf War In March 2003, the U.S attacked Iraq U.S official said major combat was over However peace and security did not occur in Iraq Bombings killed civilians, kidnappers, torture Thomas Hobbs who wrote in England in the 1600s at the time of the civil war in England. Hobbs in his writings provides a justification for strong sovereign. His justification rides on a preoccupation with peace and securities (security of person, body). His argument starts on the premises of when strong authority, a state of anarchy exists, whereas each person strives for as much individual power against others (attacking others- not peace and security). He claims that such a situation is frightening and that the best solution is to sacrifice the freedom to some greater power (sovereign), and the contract is that I sacrifice my individual freedom to sovereign but what I gain in return is security. I give the sovereign absolute power to enforce the law (to achieve peace). People lived at the time of death, disorder, tax property. HE argued that it was better to live under a sovereign than to live in a state of anarchy where there is a great deal of insecurity. IF we don’t relinquish our freedom to an absolute power, then we don’t have safety. Grain of truth: if we don’t sacrifice some of our freedom, then we stand to lose safety, security, peace of mind. Where we might disagree is that an absolute authority is needed to protect these things we cherish. Do we have to give up all of our freedom to get this good thing (safety/security)? After the American invasion of Iraq, there was authority. It was contested by the Shea and by the Curds who wanted to take advantage of this moment of instability. Widespread looting in Baghdad Loss of respect in widespread authority They imposed a military role but not .. Baath party was the ruling party. After WWII the allies (American, French, British) wanted to de-Nazify society. Made it difficult for people who were Nazi offical holding positions of authority Americans did a similar thing, wanted to remove positions of authority those who were members of the Baath Party- (start on a clean slate) The number of people who lost jobs was enormous – 30,000-50,000 civil servants lost their jobs overnight We can understand how a conqueror would want to remove these official of the old regime, because it might break on change. A wealth of experience was removed- you can’t create experience overnight, all of that know-how is lost- That’s a cost, is that cost worth paying? The American created 30,000-50,000 overnight peasants who were smart Who will enforce authority if the police are no longer in place – takes years ot create an army or police force, only a moment dispands an army or police force. It takes a lot of time to create the instruments by which authority is enforced. Concrete ways in which authority is upheld, the difficult involved for any occupying power. How is authority maintained or recreated if you are an occupying force? –It’s not easy. Illustrates that political authority (thing we take for granted) is much more salient after a change of heads of state, is pretty important. Now looking at the question of Public opinion, ideas When no ideas have authority we have a state of Nihilism- the belief in nothing as opposed to absence of belief. Crime and Punishment (dostaevsky) Known for notes of the underground He was for a time sympathetic of nihilist ideas Tries to provide the strongest argument possible against belief in religion, religious authority, by describing the terrible things that have happened to children. He talks about the kinds of evil inflicted on children through history. Doesn’t this make the case against the existence of a God? (How could he let this happen) Novel about a young man who commits a terrible double murder. He is clearly marginalized in society. Dostaesky is trying to prove how a prostitute who is consider impure, is actually a Saint- because she loves this murderer unconditionally. This guy was clearly a nihilist, believer in nothing, is converted by the love of Sonya. Describing a nihilist state of mind that is spreading through Europe of his day, and describing the emotions, disorientation, the emptiness that comes with nihilism. We have here a good description of what happens in a society where there is no authority. There was not confidence in the moral authority of the group, or individual in this new society that was emerging. You can see why the authority of opinion was called into question at the time we are studying in European thought. Situation Authority 1. Power 2. Domination 3. (a) Coercion (b) Authority 4. Legitimacy and legitimation 5. The function of authority? Weber’s definition of power- about being able to carry out one’s will In talking about power, it’s useful to contrast power in the Weberian sense with the idea of influence, the idea that there are situations where someone can have their will fulfilled without necessarily commanding other people to do certain things. When taking about authority, we are talking about power or influence. Domination - what we have in mind when Weber talks about the probability that a command will be obeyed. - Two forms: o Coercion – obedience due to a threat, fear on person or property o Authority- when people obey not so much b
More Less

Related notes for SOC203H1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit